Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

The diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology versus core needle biopsy for palpable breast lump(s).

Nagi A. Homesh, Mohamed A. Issa and Hamod A. El-Sofiani
Saudi Medical Journal January 2005, 26 (1) 42-46;
Nagi A. Homesh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohamed A. Issa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hamod A. El-Sofiani
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Breast lump is one of the most common surgical problems in females. Surgical biopsy of palpable breast lump was considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of breast lump(s). Emphasis has been placed on improving method for establishing a definitive diagnosis of breast mass prior to surgery. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core needle biopsy (CNB) in patients with palpable breast masses.

METHODS: Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial included 296 Female patients with breast lumps, presented to Al-Thawra Teaching Hospital, Sanaa, Yemen between May 1998 -- May 2002. All the patients submitted either to FNAC or CNB equally. The results were then compared with the final diagnosis by histopathology.

RESULTS: The patient age ranged from 15-74 years with a mean of 33.77 ± 11.91 years. Married patients were 69.3% and the most common presentation was breast lump(s) (88.5%). The mean size of the tumor was 3.47 ± 1.43 cm in diameter. The FNAC sensitivity was 66.66%, 81.8% specificity, 75.7% accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) 100% and negative predictive value (NPV) 90%, while in core needle breast biopsy sensitivity was 92.3%, 94.8% specificity, 93.4% accuracy, PPV 100% and NPV 100%. The diagnostic accuracy of CNB was higher than the FNAC, which was statistically significant (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures are simple, easy, safe, cheap and reliable, but CNB is more accurate than the FNAC.

  • Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 26 (1)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 26, Issue 1
1 Jan 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology versus core needle biopsy for palpable breast lump(s).
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
The diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology versus core needle biopsy for palpable breast lump(s).
Nagi A. Homesh, Mohamed A. Issa, Hamod A. El-Sofiani
Saudi Medical Journal Jan 2005, 26 (1) 42-46;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology versus core needle biopsy for palpable breast lump(s).
Nagi A. Homesh, Mohamed A. Issa, Hamod A. El-Sofiani
Saudi Medical Journal Jan 2005, 26 (1) 42-46;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Assessment of asthma control levels in a tertiary hospital
  • The risk factors for cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Saudi Arabia
  • Prolonged flight exposure and its effects on sinonasal health among aircrew members
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire