Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Comparison of midazolam, propofol and fentanyl combinations for sedation and hemodynamic parameters in cataract extraction

Varol Celiker, Elif Basgul, Altan Sahin, Sennur Uzun, Betul Bahadir and Ulku Aypar
Saudi Medical Journal August 2007, 28 (8) 1198-1203;
Varol Celiker
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elif Basgul
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Altan Sahin
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sennur Uzun
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Betul Bahadir
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulku Aypar
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Midazolam, propofol and fentanyl were compared in terms of sedation during cataract extraction. Hemodynamic parameters, sedation level, postoperative satisfaction, and side effects were investigated.

METHODS: The study was carried out in Hacettepe University Hospitals Ophthalmology Operating Theatres in 2005. The patients received only midazolam (0.02 mg kg-1), or midazolam (0.02 mg kg-1) + propofol (0.2 mg kg-1), or midazolam (0.02 mg kg-1) + fentanyl (1 microgram kg-1), or midazolam (0.02 mg kg-1) + propofol (0.2 mg kg-1) + fentanyl (1 microgram kg-1). The sedation level of patients was measured according to a physician questionnaire. Postoperative nausea/vomiting, headache, and patient satisfaction were determined via a patient's evaluation scale.

RESULTS: In the groups receiving fentanyl, the hemodynamic response to peribulbar block insertion was minimal (p<0.05) and the sedation level was best (p<0.05). Respiration rate and O2 saturation of patients receiving midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl decreased after sedation (p<0.01) and postoperative satisfaction was high in this group (p<0.01). Patients in the midazolam group showed a prominent reaction to peribulbar block insertion while movement during the operation was obvious (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION: The combination of midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl should be preferred to other study groups as the sedation level is suitable for cataract extraction with high postoperative patient satisfaction and without any side effects.

  • Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 28 (8)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 28, Issue 8
1 Aug 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of midazolam, propofol and fentanyl combinations for sedation and hemodynamic parameters in cataract extraction
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of midazolam, propofol and fentanyl combinations for sedation and hemodynamic parameters in cataract extraction
Varol Celiker, Elif Basgul, Altan Sahin, Sennur Uzun, Betul Bahadir, Ulku Aypar
Saudi Medical Journal Aug 2007, 28 (8) 1198-1203;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of midazolam, propofol and fentanyl combinations for sedation and hemodynamic parameters in cataract extraction
Varol Celiker, Elif Basgul, Altan Sahin, Sennur Uzun, Betul Bahadir, Ulku Aypar
Saudi Medical Journal Aug 2007, 28 (8) 1198-1203;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Assessment of asthma control levels in a tertiary hospital
  • The risk factors for cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Saudi Arabia
  • Prolonged flight exposure and its effects on sinonasal health among aircrew members
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire