Influence of bimaxillary protrusion on the perception of smile esthetics

References

1. ↵
   1. Bills DA,
   2. Handelman CS,
   3. BeGole EA

   (2005) Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: traits and orthodontic correction. Angle Orthod 75:333–339.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Farrow AL,
   2. Zarrinnia K,
   3. Azizi K

   (1993) Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans--an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104:240–250.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 1. Langberg BJ,
   2. Todd A

   (2004) Treatment of a Class I malocclusion with severe bimaxillary protrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126:739–746.

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. ↵
   1. Marques LS,
   2. Chaves KC,
   3. Ramos-Jorge ML,
   4. Pereira LJ

   (2011) Extraction of four premolars in Black patients with bi-protrusion: aesthetic perceptions of professionals and lay people. J Orthod 38:107–112.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. ↵
   1. Dawjee SM,
   2. Becker PJ,
   3. Hlongwa P

   (2010) Is orthodontics an option in the management of bimaxillary protrusion? SADJ 65:404–408.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. ↵
   1. Flores-Mir C,
   2. Silva E,
   3. Barriga MI,
   4. Lagravere MO,
   5. Major PW

   (2004) Lay person's perception of smile aesthetics in dental and facial views. J Orthod 31:204–209.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. ↵
   1. DeLoach N

   (1978) Soft tissue facial profile of North American blacks: A self-assessment. American Journal of Orthodontics 74:685.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Kokich VO Jr.,
   2. Kiyak HA,
   3. Shapiro PA

   (1999) Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 11:311–324.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. 1. Thomas JL,
   2. Hayes C,
   3. Zawaideh S

   (2003) The effect of axial midline angulation on dental esthetics. Angle Orthod 73:359–364.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
10. 1. Roden-Johnson D,
    2. Gallerano R,
    3. English J

    (2005) The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127:343–350.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Shaw WC,
    2. Lewis HG,
    3. Robertson NR

    (1975) Perception of malocclusion. Br Dent J 138:211–216.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Prahl-Andersen B,
    2. Boersma H,
    3. van der Linden FP,
    4. Moore AW

    (1979) Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by laypersons, general dentists, and orthodontists. J Am Dent Assoc 98:209–212.

    OpenUrlAbstract
13. ↵
    1. Abu Alhaija ES,
    2. Al-Shamsi NO,
    3. Al-Khateeb S

    (2011) Perceptions of Jordanian laypersons and dental professionals to altered smile aesthetics. Eur J Orthod 33:450–456.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 1. Zange SE,
    2. Ramos AL,
    3. Cuoghi OA,
    4. de Mendonça MR,
    5. Suguino R

    (2011) Perceptions of laypersons and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor in long- and short-face individuals. Angle Orthod 81:86–90.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
15. 1. Tedesco LA,
    2. Albino JE,
    3. Cunat JJ,
    4. Green LJ,
    5. Lewis EA,
    6. Slakter MJ

    (1983) A dental-facial attractiveness scale. Part I. Reliability and validity. Am J Orthod 83:38–43.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Phillips C,
    2. Tulloch C,
    3. Dann C

    (1992) Rating of facial attractiveness. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 20:214–220.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Arnett GW,
    2. McLaughlin RP

    (2004) Facial and dental planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons (Mosby, St. Louis (MO)).
18. ↵
    1. Maulik C,
    2. Nanda R

    (2007) Dynamic smile analysis in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132:307–315.

    OpenUrlPubMed
19. ↵
    1. Aldrees AM,
    2. Shamlan MA

    (2010) Morphological features of bimaxillary protrusion in Saudis. Saudi Med J 31:512–519.

    OpenUrlPubMed
20. ↵
    1. Janson G,
    2. Branco NC,
    3. Fernandes TM,
    4. Sathler R,
    5. Garib D,
    6. Lauris JR

    (2011) Influence of orthodontic treatment, midline position, buccal corridor and smile arc on smile attractiveness. Angle Orthod 81:153–161.

    OpenUrlPubMed
21. ↵
    1. Schabel BJ,
    2. McNamara JA Jr.,
    3. Franchi L,
    4. Baccetti T

    (2009) Q-sort assessment vs visual analog scale in the evaluation of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135(4 Suppl):S61–S71.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Peck H,
    2. Peck S

    (1970) A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 40:284–318.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Brisman AS

    (1980) Esthetics: a comparison of dentists’ and patients’ concepts. J Am Dent Assoc 100:345–352.

    OpenUrlAbstract
24. ↵
    1. Kerns LL,
    2. Silveira AM,
    3. Kerns DG,
    4. Regennitter FJ

    (1997) Esthetic preference of the frontal and profile views of the same smile. J Esthet Dent 9:76–85.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
25. ↵
    1. Işiksal E,
    2. Hazar S,
    3. Akyalçin S

    (2006) Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129:8–16.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Oh HS,
    2. Korn EL,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Liu Y,
    5. Xu T,
    6. Boyd R,
    7. et al.

    (2009) Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:762.1–14.

    OpenUrl