Comparison of outcomes after bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty using posterior-substituting versus cruciate-retaining prostheses

References

1. ↵
   1. Lim BO,
   2. Shin HS,
   3. Lee YS

   (2014) Biomechanical comparison of rotational activities between anterior cruciate ligament- and posterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2959-8.
2. ↵
   1. Kennedy NI,
   2. Wijdicks CA,
   3. Goldsmith MT,
   4. Michalski MP,
   5. Devitt BM,
   6. Årøen A,
   7. et al.

   (2013) Kinematic analysis of the posterior cruciate ligament, part 1: the individual and collective function of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles. Am J Sports Med 41:2828–2838.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Pritchett JW

   (2013) A comparison of the noise generated from different types of knee prostheses. J Knee Surg 26:101–104.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Kim YH,
   2. Kim JS,
   3. Yoon SH

   (2008) A recession of posterior cruciate ligament in posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23:999–1004.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Sierra RJ,
   2. Berry DJ

   (2008) Surgical technique differences between posterior-substituting and cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23:20–23.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. ↵
   1. Watanabe T,
   2. Ishizuki M,
   3. Muneta T,
   4. Banks SA

   (2013) Knee kinematics in anterior cruciate ligament-substituting arthroplasty with or without the posterior cruciate ligament. J Arthroplasty 28:548–552.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Joglekar S,
   2. Gioe TJ,
   3. Yoon P,
   4. Schwartz MH

   (2012) Gait analysis comparison of cruciate retaining and substituting TKA following PCL sacrifice. Knee 19:279–285.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. ↵
   1. Kim YH,
   2. Kim JS,
   3. Yoon SH

   (2008) A recession of posterior cruciate ligament in posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23:999–1004.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Lozano-Calderón SA,
   2. Shen J,
   3. Doumato DF,
   4. Greene DA,
   5. Zelicof SB

   (2013) Cruciate-retaining vs posterior-substituting inserts in total knee arthroplasty: functional outcome comparison. J Arthroplasty 28:234–242.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Lützner J,
    2. Firmbach FP,
    3. Lützner C,
    4. Dexel J,
    5. Kirschner S

    (2014) Similar stability and range of motion between cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting ultracongruent insert total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3259-z.
11. ↵
    1. Chen JY,
    2. Lo NN,
    3. Chong HC,
    4. Pang HN,
    5. Tay DK,
    6. Chin PL,
    7. et al.

    (2014) Cruciate retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty after previous high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 10.1007/s00167-014-3259-z.
12. ↵
    1. Sierra RJ,
    2. Berry DJ

    (2008) Surgical technique differences between posterior-substituting and cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23:20–23.

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. ↵
    1. Hrubina M,
    2. Skoták M

    (2012) [Joint dislocation after total knee arthroplasty as an ankle fracture complication. Case report]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 79:376–379, Czech.

    OpenUrlPubMed
14. ↵
    1. Luo SX,
    2. Zhao JM,
    3. Su W,
    4. Li XF,
    5. Dong GF

    (2012) Posterior cruciate substituting versus posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty prostheses: a meta-analysis. Knee 19:246–252.

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. ↵
    1. Suggs JF,
    2. Hanson GR,
    3. Park SE,
    4. Moynihan AL,
    5. Li G

    (2008) Patient function after a posterior stabilizing total knee arthroplasty: cam-post engagement and knee kinematics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:290–296.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Casino D,
    2. Martelli S,
    3. Zaffagnini S,
    4. Lopomo N,
    5. Iacono F,
    6. Bignozzi S,
    7. et al.

    (2009) Knee stability before and after total and unicondylar knee replacement: in vivo kinematic evaluation utilizing navigation. J Orthop Res 27:202–207.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. ↵
    1. Ritter MA,
    2. Davis KE,
    3. Farris A,
    4. Keating EM,
    5. Faris PM

    (2014) The surgeon's role in relative success of PCL-retaining and PCL-substituting total knee arthroplasty. HSS J 10:107–115.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Torres-Claramunt R,
    2. Leal J,
    3. Hinarejos P,
    4. Pelfort X,
    5. Puig L

    (2013) Correlation study between KSS, WOMAC and SF-36 scores in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in a Spanish speaking population. J Arthroplasty 28:950–953.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. van den Boom LG,
    2. Halbertsma JP,
    3. van Raaij JJ,
    4. Brouwer RW,
    5. Bulstra SK,
    6. van den Akker-Scheek I

    (2014) No difference in gait between posterior cruciate retention and the posterior stabilized design after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:3135–3141.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Farahini H,
    2. Moghtadaei M,
    3. Bagheri A,
    4. Akbarian E

    (2012) Factors influencing range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Iran Red Crescent Med J 14:417–421.

    OpenUrlPubMed
21. ↵
    1. Moynihan AL,
    2. Varadarajan KM,
    3. Hanson GR,
    4. Park SE,
    5. Nha KW,
    6. Suggs JF,
    7. et al.

    (2010) In vivo knee kinematics during high flexion after a posterior-substituting total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 34:497–503.

    OpenUrlPubMed