Is prilocaine safe and potent enough for use in the oral surgery of medically compromised patients

References

1. ↵
   1. Alzahrani F,
   2. Duggal MS,
   3. Munyombwe T,
   4. Tahmassebi JF

   (2018) Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for extraction and pulpotomy of mandibular primary molars:an equivalence parallel prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Paediatr Dent 28:335–344.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Gazal G,
   2. Alharbi R,
   3. Fareed WM,
   4. Omar E,
   5. Alolayan AB,
   6. Al-Zoubi H,
   7. Alnazzawi AA

   (2017) Comparison of onset anesthesia time and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine during teeth extractions. Saudi J Anaesth 11:152–157.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Gazal G,
   2. Fareed WM,
   3. Zafar MS

   (2016) Role of intraseptal anaesthesia for pain-free dental treatment. Saudi J Anaesth 10:81–86.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Gazal G,
   2. Alharbi AM,
   3. Al-Samadani KH,
   4. Kanaa MD

   (2015) Articaine and mepivacaine buccal infiltration in securing mandibular first molar pulp anesthesia following mepivacaine inferior alveolar nerve block:a randomized, double-blind crossover study. Saudi J Anaesth 9:397–403.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Malamed SF

   (2012) Handbook of Local Anaesthesia (Mosby, St. Louis (MO)), 6th ed.
6. ↵
   1. Little JW,
   2. Falace DA,
   3. Miller C,
   4. Rhodus NL

   (2017) Dental management of the medically compromised patient (Elsevier Mosby, St. Louis (MO)), 8th ed.
7. ↵
   1. Hashemi SH,
   2. Ladez SR,
   3. Moghadam SA

   (2016) Comparative assessment of the effects of three local anesthetics:lidocaine, prilocaine, and mepivacaine on blood pressure changes in patients with controlled hypertension. Glob J Health Sci 8:54157.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Shafaifard S,
   2. Khan RH

   (2016) The use of lidocaine and prilocaine in dental surgery. Archives of Anesthesiology and Critical Care 2:197–199.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Mittal M,
   2. Sharma S,
   3. Kumar A,
   4. Chopra R,
   5. Srivastava D

   (2015) Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine during primary maxillary molar extractions in children. Pediatr Dent 37:520–524.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. St George G,
    2. Morgan A,
    3. Meechan J,
    4. Moles DR,
    5. Needleman I,
    6. Ng YL,
    7. et al.

    (2018) Injectable local anesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:7–CD006487.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Chitre AP

    (2016) Manual of local anesthesia in dentistry (Jaypee, New Delhi (IN)), 3rd ed.
12. ↵
    1. Abu-Mostafa N,
    2. Aldawssary A,
    3. Assari A,
    4. Alnujaidy S,
    5. Almutlaq A

    (2015) A prospective randomized clinical trial compared various types of local anesthetics cartridges. J Clin Exp Dent 7:e84–88.

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. ↵
    1. Karm MH,
    2. Kim M,
    3. Park FD,
    4. Seo KS,
    5. Kim HJ

    (2018) Comparative evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and hemostatic effect of 2% lidocaine with various concentrations of epinephrine. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 18:143–149.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Nydegger B,
    2. Nusstein J,
    3. Reader A,
    4. Drum M,
    5. Beck M

    (2014) Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar:a prospective randomized, double-blind study. J Endod 40:1912–1916.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed