Leeds sleep evaluation questionnaire in Jordanian university students

References

1. ↵
   1. Manzar MD,
   2. Zannat W,
   3. Hussain ME,
   4. Pandi-Perumal SR,
   5. Bahammam AS,
   6. Barakat D,
   7. et al.

   (2016) Dimensionality of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index in the collegiate young adults. Springerplus 5:1550.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Manzar MD,
   2. Salahuddin M,
   3. Maru TT,
   4. Alghadir A,
   5. Anwer S,
   6. Bahammam AS,
   7. et al.

   (2018) Validation of the adapted Leeds sleep evaluation questionnaire in Ethiopian university students. Health Qual Life Outcomes 16:49.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Tarrasch R,
   2. Laudon M,
   3. Zisapel N

   (2003) Cross-cultural validation of the Leeds sleep evaluation questionnaire (LSEQ) in insomnia patients. Hum Psychopharmacol 18:603–610.

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. ↵
   1. Zisapel N,
   2. Laudon M

   (2003) Subjective assessment of the effects of CNS-active drugs on sleep by the Leeds sleep evaluation questionnaire:a review. Hum Psychopharmacol 18:1–20.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. ↵
   1. Parrott AC,
   2. Hindmarch I

   (1978) Factor analysis of a sleep evaluation questionnaire. Psychol Med 8:325–329.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Parrott AC,
   2. Hindmarch I

   (1980) The Leeds sleep evaluation questionnaire in psychopharmacological investigations - a review. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 71:173–179.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
7. ↵
   1. Mastin DF,
   2. Bryson J,
   3. Corwyn R

   (2006) Assessment of sleep hygiene using the sleep hygiene index. J Behav Med 29:223–227.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Ito E,
   2. Inoue Y

   (2015) [The international classification of sleep disorders, third edition. American academy of sleep medicine. Includes bibliographies and index]. Nihon Rinsho 73:916–923.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Ozdemir PG,
   2. Boysan M,
   3. Selvi Y,
   4. Yildirim A,
   5. Yilmaz E

   (2015) Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the sleep hygiene index in clinical and non-clinical samples. Compr Psychiatry 59:135–140.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Rhemtulla M,
    2. Brosseau-Liard PÉ,
    3. Savalei V

    (2012) When can categorical variables be treated as continuous?A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol Methods 17:354–373.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Manzar MD,
    2. Zannat W,
    3. Moiz JA,
    4. Spence DW,
    5. Pandi-Perumal SR,
    6. Bahammam AS,
    7. et al.

    (2016) Factor scoring models of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index:a comparative confirmatory factor analysis. Biological Rhythm Research 47:851–864.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Jaccard J,
    2. Wan CK

    (1996) LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression (Sage Publications, New York (NY)).
13. ↵
    1. Xia Y,
    2. Yang Y

    (2019) RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data:The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behav Res Methods 51:409–428.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. ↵
    1. Manzar MD,
    2. BaHammam AS,
    3. Hameed UA,
    4. Spence DW,
    5. Pandi-Perumal SR,
    6. Moscovitch A,
    7. et al.

    (2018) Dimensionality of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index:a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 16:89.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Albougami A,
    2. Manzar MD

    (2019) Insomnia severity index:a psychometric investigation among Saudi nurses. Sleep Breath 23:987–996.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Kim I,
    2. Choi H,
    3. Kim B

    (2014) Psychometric properties of Korean version of modified Leeds sleep evaluation questionnaire (KMLSEQ). The Korean Journal of Rehabilitation Nursing 17:10–17.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Wang M,
    2. Batt K,
    3. Kessler C,
    4. Neff A,
    5. Iyer NN,
    6. Cooper DL,
    7. et al.

    (2017) Internal consistency and item-total correlation of patient-reported outcome instruments and hemophilia joint health score v2.1 in US adult people with hemophilia:results from the pain, functional impairment, and quality of life (P-FiQ) study. Patient Prefer Adherence 11:1831–1839.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Manzar MD,
    2. Albougami A,
    3. Salahuddin M,
    4. Sony P,
    5. Spence DW,
    6. Pandi-Perumal SR

    (2018) The Mizan meta-memory and meta-concentration scale for students (MMSS):a test of its psychometric validity in a sample of university students. BMC Psychol 6:59.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Anselmi P,
    2. Colledani D,
    3. Robusto E

    (2019) A comparison of classical and modern measures of internal consistency. Front Psychol 10:2714.

    OpenUrl