Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Pathological spectrum of endometrial biopsies in Saudi women with abnormal uterine bleeding

A retrospective study of 13-years

Sufia Husain, Reema S. Al Hammad, Aljawhara K. Alduhaysh, Mada M. AlBatly and Ammar Alrikabi
Saudi Medical Journal March 2021, 42 (3) 270-279; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2021.42.3.20200814
Sufia Husain
From the Department of Pathology (Husain, Alrikabi), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Al Hammad), Department of Pediatrics Neurology (Alduhaysh), College of Medicine (AlBatly), King Saud University; and from the Department of Pathology (Husain), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Al Hammad), Department of Pediatrics Neurology (Alduhaysh), King Saud University-Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD, FRCPath
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Reema S. Al Hammad
From the Department of Pathology (Husain, Alrikabi), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Al Hammad), Department of Pediatrics Neurology (Alduhaysh), College of Medicine (AlBatly), King Saud University; and from the Department of Pathology (Husain), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Al Hammad), Department of Pediatrics Neurology (Alduhaysh), King Saud University-Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aljawhara K. Alduhaysh
From the Department of Pathology (Husain, Alrikabi), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Al Hammad), Department of Pediatrics Neurology (Alduhaysh), College of Medicine (AlBatly), King Saud University; and from the Department of Pathology (Husain), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Al Hammad), Department of Pediatrics Neurology (Alduhaysh), King Saud University-Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mada M. AlBatly
From the Department of Pathology (Husain, Alrikabi), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Al Hammad), Department of Pediatrics Neurology (Alduhaysh), College of Medicine (AlBatly), King Saud University; and from the Department of Pathology (Husain), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Al Hammad), Department of Pediatrics Neurology (Alduhaysh), King Saud University-Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ammar Alrikabi
From the Department of Pathology (Husain, Alrikabi), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Al Hammad), Department of Pediatrics Neurology (Alduhaysh), College of Medicine (AlBatly), King Saud University; and from the Department of Pathology (Husain), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Al Hammad), Department of Pediatrics Neurology (Alduhaysh), King Saud University-Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD, FRCPAth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives: To assess and age stratify the types and frequencies of endometrial pathologies in Saudi women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) that underwent endometrial biopsies, at our hospital over a 13-year period.

Methods: In a retrospective study, from 2006 to 2018, all endometrial biopsies from Saudi women with AUB, reported at the laboratory of King Saud University-Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, were revisited and analyzed. The women were categorized into <40, between 40-55 and >55 years of age.

Results: We analyzed 6458 biopsies. In <40 and 40-55 years’ groups cyclical endometrium was most common followed by endometrial polyps and disordered proliferative endometrium. In the >55 years’ group, atrophic endometrium was most common followed by endometrial polyps. The hyperplasias and malignancies together accounted for 7.2% of the study, majority in the >55 years’ group. Simple hyperplasia without atypia was the most common (3.9%), followed by malignancies (1.9%), complex atypical hyperplasia (0.7%), complex hyperplasia without atypia (0.4%), and simple atypical hyperplasia (0.3%).

Conclusion: Awareness of the probable spectrum of endometrial histopathologies in the various ages is useful in guiding management. Endometrial biopsies are valuable in early detection of precancerous and cancerous endometrial lesions especially in women over 40 years.

  • abnormal uterine bleeding
  • age stratified
  • endometrial sampling and pathology
  • menopause
  • endometrial hyperplasia
  • carcinoma

Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) refers to menstrual bleeding which is abnormal in terms of quantity, time duration or regularity. It can present as menorrhagia, metrorrahagia, polymenorrhoea, oligomenorrhoea, amenorrhoea, intermenstrual or postcoital bleeding. Abnormal uterine bleeding is one of the major gynecologic complaints, accounting for approximately 30% of outpatient visits to the gynecological clinic by women in the reproductive age and approximately 70% of gynecological consultations in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.1

In 2011, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics introduced a new classification system termed by the acronym “PALM–COEIN” (polyp, adenomyosis, leiomyoma, malignancy and hyperplasia, coagulopathy, ovulatory dysfunction, endometrial, iatrogenic and not yet classified) for the common causes of AUB in non-pregnant women of reproductive age, in order to homogenize terminology.2 Common causes of AUB in female under 18 years of age includes hormonal dysregulation, pregnancy, use of hormonal contraceptive pills, pelvic infections, coagulopathies, and tumors (ovarian). In women between 19-39 years, the potential causes include pregnancy associated conditions (miscarriages, placenta previa, placental abruption, ectopic pregnancy and trophoblastic diseases), leiomyomas, endometrial polyps, polycystic ovarian disease (PCOD), hormonal contraception and endometrial hyperplasia (with or without atypia). Endometrial cancers are relatively uncommon in this age group. Endometritis, diseases of the uterine cervix, various systemic (namely, endocrine disorders) and iatrogenic (namely, drugs) conditions can also cause AUB. Regarding women aged above 40 years, the causes of AUB include anovulatory bleeding (reduced ovarian function perimenopausal women), endometrial atrophy, leiomyomas, endometrial polyps, endometrial hyperplasia (with or without atypia) and carcinoma. Abnormal uterine bleeding especially in women over 40 years of age requires detailed investigations in terms of medical history, physical examination, laboratory testing and radiological evaluation such as ultrasonography, hysteroscopy, sonohystography. Furthermore, age above 40 years, use of exogenous hormones (namely, tamoxifen), nulliparity, obesity and anovulatory cycles are risk factors for developing endometrial cancer.3,4 The decision to do sampling of the uterine endometrial lining for histopathological assessment is at the discretion of the clinician. Based on the current recommendation of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists endometrial tissue sampling should be a first line procedure in the management of AUB in women over 45 years. In women younger than 45 years, any history of unopposed estrogen exposure (namely, obesity or PCOD), ineffective medical treatment and persistent AUB should be an indication for endometrial sampling.5,6 Endometrial sampling can be performed as an outpatient or as an inpatient procedure. The histopathological assessment of the tissue sample by light microscopy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and other endometrial pathologies and it has a high accuracy in identifying endometrial hyperplasia and carcinomas.7,8 For endometrial biopsy, the pipelle or dilatation and curettage methods are effective and minimally invasive methods, and in certain cases, curettage may itself be therapeutic. The possible pathological patterns observed in endometrial samples include menstrual, proliferative, secretory, atrophic and disordered proliferative endometrium, endometritis, endometrial polyps, endometrial hyperplasia with or without atypia and endometrial malignancies. For the optimal interpretation of an endometrial sample, information pertaining to patient’s age, clinical history, menstrual cycle and drug history regarding the use of exogenous hormones, ultrasound findings including the endometrial thickness should be provided to the reporting pathologist. The pathology report contributes significantly to the management in AUB. The prevalence of uterine malignancies increases with age and is most frequent in women aged 55-64 years. However, about 20% of such cancers are diagnosed in women younger than 55 years and AUB is the most common symptom in endometrial hyperplasia and carcinomas.9,10

The objective of this study is to document the spectrum of pathologies and their frequencies diagnosed in the endometrial biopsies of Saudi women that presented to our hospital complaining of AUB, over a period of 13 years. We also studied the variation in the endometrial pathologies in 3 different age groups, in order to explore the common causes of AUB in those age groups. Our hospital is a tertiary facility in the central region of Saudi Arabia and our findings reflect the range of possible causes of AUB in this region.

Methods

This is a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary level medical center, King Khalid University Hospital (KKUH), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at King Saud University-Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (IRB number E-17-2538, reference: 20/0787/IRB). All non-pregnant Saudi women who underwent endometrial sampling at our hospital from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2018, covering a 13-year period, were included in this study. As per routine protocol, the endometrial samples were fixed in 10% formalin solution and processed as per standard methods and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The prepared slides were subsequently examined using a light microscope and reported by certified anatomical pathologists. Any case that was reported as malignant was examined and co-signed by 2 certified anatomical pathologists. Non-Saudi women and pregnancy related bleeding were excluded from this study. The patients were age stratified into 3 categories: i) younger than 40 years, ii) aged 40-55 years, and iii) older than 55 years. The medical records with the pathology reports of all the study cases were reviewed and cataloged according to the following variables: date and patient age at time of sampling, menstrual history, and endometrial sample histopathology report. The histopathology reports were tabulated under the following possibilities: unsatisfactory, normal menstrual patterns (proliferative, secretory and menstrual phases), atrophic endometrium and pathologies like chronic endometritis, endometrial polyp, luteal phase defect, effects of exogenous hormone therapy, disordered proliferative endometrium, simple hyperplasia (with and without atypia), complex hyperplasia (with and without atypia), and invasive malignancy. For patients who underwent follow up hysterectomy, their post-operative pathology report was also documented. Lastly, statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft excel.

Results

A total of 6458 endometrial biopsies were analyzed. The mean age of the women at the time of sampling was 49.5 ± 9 years. The majority (69.2%, n=4466) of our endometrial samples were from women aged 40-55 years, followed by women older than 55 years (20.2%, n=1302), and then by women under 40 years (10.7%, n=690) (Figure 1).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

- Age group distribution of the study population.

Pathological findings were reported in 46.4% (n=2996) of the samples and the remaining 53.6% (n=3462) of endometrial samples of were reported as normal cyclical endometrium, atrophic endometrium or unsatisfactory for opinion (Figure 2). Normal cyclical patterns (proliferative, secretory and menstrual) amounted to 28.6% (n=1848) and atrophic endometrium accounted for 11% (n=712). A modest percentage of biopsies, 14% (n=902) were inadequate, containing blood clot and mucinous material only and were rendered as unsatisfactory for opinion. All our findings were tabulated in an age stratified manner (Table 1).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

- Types of endometrial sample in the study population.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

- Age stratified histopathological spectrum of endometrial samples.

Among all the endometrial pathologies (n=2996), endometrial polyps (39.3%) were the most common, followed by disordered proliferative endometrium (DPE) (27.1%), then collectively hyperplasias and malignancies (15.5%), chronic endometritis (10.3%), exogenous hormone associated changes (6.4%), and lastly luteal phase defect (1.5%) (Figure 3).

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

- Types and percentages of the pathological endometrial samples reported in the study population. DPE: disordered proliferative endometrium, SH - simple hyperplasia, CH - complex hyperplasia

In the below 40 years age group (n=690) the most common physiological condition was secretory endometrium (26.1%; n=180) and pathological condition was benign endometrial polyp (22.2%; n=153). Similarly, in the 40-55 years age group (n=4466) the most common physiological condition was secretory endometrium (17%; n=760) and pathological condition was benign endometrial polyp (16.6%; n=739). In the above 55 years age group (n=1302) the most common physiological condition was atrophic endometrium (29.7%; n =387) and the pathological condition was benign endometrial polyp (21.9%; n=85).

Hyperplasias (with and without atypia) and malignancies collectively comprised 7.2% (n=463) of the entire study population, in which simple hyperplasia without atypia was the most common (3.93%: n=254), followed by malignancies (1.9%: n=122), then complex hyperplasia with atypia (0.7%: n = 43), without atypia (0.4%: n=24) and finally simple hyperplasia with atypia (0.3%: n=20) (Table 1). Among the endometrial pathologies, the hyperplasias and malignancies together constituted 15.5% of all pathologies. The stratified age group study showed a rising trend with age, with the over 55 group dominating the malignancies and hyperplasias (Figure 4).

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

- Histogram of the age stratified distribution of the hyperplasias and malignancies in the study group.

Among the biopsies reported as malignant (n=122) (1.9% of the study population and 4.17% of the endometrial pathologies), majority were endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas amounting to 70.5% (n=86) of all cancers, majority belonging to the international federation of gynecology and obstetrics (FIGO) histologic grade 1 (Table 2). Other malignancies included serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, mixed malignant mullarian tumors, adenosarcoma, malignant mixed Mullerian tumor, and squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix. The primary treatment for endometrial cancer is total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAHBO). TAHBOs were performed in 73.8% (n=90) of the cases, out of which 83.3% (n=75) were reported the same as the initial endometrial sample. The remaining cases showed minor discrepancies in terms of the classification of the malignant tumor. In some cases, the FIGO grade was modified, while in others, the sub-classification of the malignancy was changed. On case turned out to be adenocarcinoma of the cervix extending into the uterine corpus, while 2 cases were reclassified as metastatic ovarian and colorectal carcinoma.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

- Tabulation of the malignant endometrial reports and the follow up hysterectomies.

Discussion

Abnormal uterine bleeding is a common gynecological problem encountered by women of every age group. It has a noticeable impact on the health and quality of life, affecting 10% to 30% of women in the reproductive age.11,12 Even though the majority of women with AUB do not have a malignant or premalignant lesion, it should not be ignored, especially in postmenopausal women since the risk of endometrial malignancies in postmenopausal bleeding ranges from 3% to 25%.13 Globally, endometrial cancer is the sixth most common type of cancer in women and is the most common gynecological cancer.14,15 Hyperplasias can be precancerous, having noninvasive proliferation of the endometrium and based on architectural complexity and nuclear atypia are classified as simple or complex hyperplasia with or without atypia. Studies have shown that without treatment, the risk of non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia progressing to carcinoma is less than 5% over a 20-year period and most of such cases regress spontaneously during follow-up, with progression risk of simple (1%) and complex (3%) hyperplasia without atypia.16 Complex hyperplasia with atypia is most likely to progress to endometrioid endometrial carcinoma and it is associated with a probable coexistent endometrial carcinoma in approximately 30% to 40% of cases.17,18 The risk of a woman developing endometrial cancer in their lifetime ranges from 0.7% to 1.6% with the prevalence increasing with age.19 An estimated 3.1% of women are diagnosed with uterine cancer at some point in their life.10 Endometrial tissue sampling (pipelle or curettage) is the gold standard for a definitive diagnosis and it is the only investigation modality that may identify and differentiate endometrial hyperplasia from invasive cancer.20 The endometrium is a dynamic tissue and shows variable histological changes depending on age, phase of menstrual cycle and any other specific pathology. Assessment of endometrial samples can be a diagnostic challenge to pathologists because of the overlapping histological findings, lack of sample adequacy or inter-observer variability. The spectrum of causes of AUB is wide and variable ranging from normal physiological causes to endometrial hyperplasias and malignancies.

In this study we evaluated the type and frequency of endometrial histology encountered in a large population of Saudi women with AUB (n=6458) at our histopathology laboratory over a 13-year period. Majority of our biopsies belonged to women in 40-55 years’ age group. In women younger than 40 years of age, normal menstrual pattern was the most common histological finding. The same was true for the 40-55 years’ age group, while in women over 55 years, the most common histological finding was atrophic endometrium. Each pathological pattern encountered in our participants is detailed below.

Cyclical endometrium

A large proportion of our cases (28.6% of total study population) represented physiological cyclical endometrium (proliferative, secretory or menstrual). Bleeding during proliferative and secretory phases are usually due to anovulatory cycles or ovulatory dysfunctions and they tend to be more common around menarche and perimenopause/menopause and do not necessarily indicate an underlying pathological disease. Abnormalities of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis leads to aberrations in ovarian follicle maturation, ovulation, or corpus luteum formation; hence, they affect the hormonal milieu and result in AUB. Around menarche, AUB is probably due to immaturity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. A range of endocrine disorders that can cause ovulatory dysfunction.21

Atrophic endometrium

It was one of the most common cause of AUB in women over 55 years of age (11% of total study population). It is a response to the hypoestrogenism that occurs around menopause. The atrophic endometrial sample tends to be scanty, comprising of superficial strips of non-proliferative endometrial gland lining with little to no endometrial stroma. Notably, since there is atrophy, the scant tissue sample does not necessarily make the biopsy inadequate and such cases should be interpreted in light of patient’s menopausal status. Giannella et al,22 in their study found that approximately 90% of asymptomatic postmenopausal women with endometrial thickness of less than 7 mm showed atrophic endometrium upon being biopsied. The cause of bleeding in atrophy is not well known; it is probably a hormone deficiency related endometrial thinning, making the lining fragile and susceptible to injury and bleeding. Another theory suggests the rupture of thin-walled blood vessels around the cystically dilated atrophic glands as a possible cause.23 The world literature also documents atrophic endometrium to be the most common cause of AUB in postmenopausal women.24

Benign endometrial polyp

It was the most common endometrial pathology reported in our study (18.2% of the total study population and 39.3% of the endometrial pathologies). Majority of the cases were among women aged 40-55 years. The prevalence of benign endometrial polyps in women with AUB ranges from 20% to 40%, and their incidence increases with advancing age.25 The etiology of endometrial polyps is probably related to unopposed estrogen stimulation, leading to localized proliferation and hyperplasia of endometrial glands and stroma, which over time evolves into a polyp. In comparison to the adjacent normal endometrium, endometrial polyps exhibit increased expression of estrogen and bcl2 and decreased expression of progesterone. Cytogenetic studies indicate anomalies in chromosome 6, 7 and 12.26 Other associated conditions that may predispose to endometrial polyp formation include hypertension, obesity, late menopause, and tamoxifen therapy.

Disordered proliferative endometrium

After endometrial polyps, DPE was the second most commonly encountered pathology in our study (12.6% of the total study population and 27.1% of endometrial pathologies), and the most prevalent in the 40-55 years age group. Disordered proliferative endometrium is an exaggerated proliferative phase representing chronic anovulation in the perimenopausal years. As a result of the anovulation, the corpus luteum does not develop, culminating in relative increase in estrogen levels and a relative decrease in progesterone levels. This chronic prolonged unopposed estrogen stimulates disorderly proliferation of the endometrium with mild glandular architectural distortion, making the endometrium fragile, unstable and susceptible to subsequent shedding.27 The bleeding in DPE tends to be painless and irregular.

Endometritis

We reported a significant number of cases of non-specific chronic endometritis (4.8% of the total study population and 10.3% of endometrial pathologies) and they were mainly observed in the 40-55 years age group. The diagnosis of chronic endometritis depends upon finding plasma cells, and there may be associated spindling of stromal cells, lymphoid follicles, stromal edema, and altered glandular development. Chronic endometritis is often asymptomatic but it may present with AUB, pelvic pain or leukorrhea. In previous study,28 the overall prevalence of chronic endometritis ranges from 42% to 52% in endometrial samples of women with non-neoplastic causes of AUB. Chronic endometritis has also been documented in 10% to 11% of patients who underwent hysterectomies for benign gynecologic conditions.29,30 Many studies have demonstrated a relationship between chronic endometritis and infertility/recurrent miscarriage/implantation failure with the prevalence of chronic endometritis in such cases ranging from 3% to 60%.31 Another study suggested an association between endometrial polyps and chronic endometritis in premenopausal women with AUB.32 Due to the absence of typical clinical or ultrasound findings, the diagnosis of chronic endometritis relies on histology but histological assessment too is nonspecific and therefore a combination of histology, hysteroscopy and microbial culture is commonly used for chronic endometritis diagnosis. Endometrial culture is not routinely performed at our hospital and we do not have information regarding endometrial culture in our patients. Our study is limited by the absence of information regarding endometrial cultures of our patients.

Exogenous hormonal therapy associated changes

These were also reported in our study (3% of the total study population and 6.4% of endometrial pathologies). Progesterone compounds are commonly used to control AUB by inhibiting ovulation and endometrial growth. Histology of such cases typically show endometrial gland atrophy and decidualized the endometrial stroma. Occasional they may show hypersecretory glands.33

Luteal phase defect

It was reported in a small percentage of our samples (0.7% of the total study population and 1.5% of endometrial pathologies). It is a type of ovulatory AUB in which ovulation occurs, but the production of progesterone by the corpus luteum is insufficient, resulting in development of an abnormal poorly developed secretory endometrium.21

Hyperplasias and maligancies

Collectively the hyperplasias and malignancies (7.2% of the total study population and 15.5% of all endometrial pathologies) were most common in women over 55 years of age. Specifically, 341 of our patients were diagnosed with hyperplasias (5.3% of the total study population and 11.4% of all endometrial pathologies) out of which, simple hyperplasia without atypia was the most common. The second most common was complex atypical hyperplasia followed by complex hyperplasia without atypia. Typically, endometrial hyperplasia is due to failure of ovulation in perimenopausal women, with resultant prolonged action of excessive estrogen derived from persistent unripe ovarian follicles. In regards to malignancies, 122 of our samples were positive for cancer (1.9% of total study population and 4.1% of endometrial pathologies), the incidence being more common in women over 55 years. This was similar to reported literature that majority of malignancies were diagnosed among patients older than 55 years.34 As per world literature, approximately 90% of endometrial cancers are diagnosed in women older than 50 years, 20% are diagnosed in women before menopause, and 2% to 14% are reported in women younger than 40 years.20,35 In our study only 0.3% of participants under the age of 40 were diagnosed with cancer, and the incidence increased with age, being diagnosed in 0.7% of the 40-55 years group and 7% in women over 55 years. It is therefore incumbent that all women over 40 years of age with AUB should to undergo endometrial screening in the form of endometrial sampling for early detection and treatment of premalignant or malignant conditions. One study observed a relatively good diagnostic accuracy in detecting intrauterine malignancy when combining the parameters of being post-menopausal, symptomatic and having an endometrial thickness of more than 4 mm.36 AUB is the most common symptom of endometrial cancer and long-term chronic exposure to unopposed estrogen is the primary risk factor.20 Of the 122 cases of endometrial malignancies, endometrioid carcinoma accounted for 70.5% (n=86). Notably, 24.4% (21 out of 86 cases) and 1.64% (2 out of 86 cases) of our endometrioid carcinomas showed coexistent complex atypical hyperplasia and simple atypical hyperplasia, respectively, attesting to a clear association between atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma. Hence, it is recommended that all women with biopsy diagnosed atypical hyperplasia should receive definitive surgical management as the risk of coexistent cancer is high. The overall results of our study are in tandem with and comparable to data reported in existing literature.37,38 The relatively lower frequency of endometrial carcinoma in our study population can probably be attributed to early childbearing and multiparity.

Unsatisfactory for opinion

A proportion of endometrial specimens were render unsatisfactory for opinion in our study (13.9%) as they only presented blood clots or mucin. There is limited literature available on the criteria for adequate and inadequate endometrial specimen. Approximately 20% (n=186 186/902) of our unsatisfactory samples were from women in the over 55 years; the unsatisfactory nature of the sample may be attributed to the menopausal atrophy of the endometrium. One study suggested that an inadequate endometrial sample reflects a non-neoplastic condition and is enough to rule out endometrial hyperplasia and malignancy; they did so by demonstrating that an inadequate sample has a high negative predictive value in diagnosing endometrial neoplasia.39 Another limitation in endometrial biopsies is that the sample might not be collected from the entire endometrium; hence, a lesional area may be missed, yielding an inaccurate report. Especially in a blind biopsy, if the cancer is focal it can be missed. In order to prevent this, we recommend correlation with the thickness of endometrial wall rendered on ultrasound. Also, simultaneous hysteroscopy will provide additional information. It has been demonstrated and recommended, that in case of asymptomatic women, a cut off value of endometrial thickness of 8 mm or more can be used as an indication to perform hysteroscopy and subsequent biopsy, in order to detect endometrial pathologies.40

Study limitations

The current study did not correlate our biopsy pathologies with the corresponding endometrial thicknesses. In addition, the participants of this study were considered as symptomatic and having AUB based on the participants self-assessment of their menstruation. Also, for some of our malignant endometrial biopsies we did not have information on the follow up hysterectomies. The major strength of our study lies in the large sample size and data pertaining to Saudi women, thereby enabling good representation of this community for analysis of such disorders.

In conclusion, endometrial sampling is a crucial diagnostic modality used in the management of women with AUB. It demonstrates the hormonal response of endometrium and is a reliable indicator that provides information regarding probable specific and nonspecific causes of AUB, and yielding a range of patterns from normal endometrium to malignancy. The majority of our patients with AUB presented with normal cyclic endometrium, followed by endometrial polyps and disordered proliferative endometrium. Malignant lesions were the least common patterns observed in our endometrial samples. This study also demonstrated that different age groups are associated with different patterns of AUB, normal physiological changes were the most common finding in women under 40 years of age. The 40-55 years’ age group too showed normal physiological changes along with a substantial number of DPE and endometrial polyps. Endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial malignancies were more common in the perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. However, regardless of age, irregular menstrual bleeding warrants a thorough investigation and it is essential to perform endometrial sampling with histopathological evaluation in all women over 40 years, in order to rule out the possibility of pre-neoplastic conditions or malignancy. The accurate analysis of endometrial samplings and timely diagnosis of pre-neoplastic and neoplastic conditions are the keys to optimal and effective management, as prognosis is excellent in early detection of tumors. The importance of endometrial sampling and histopathological evaluation in women with AUB, to guide further management, cannot be overemphasized, especially in perimenopausal females.

Acknowledgment

We, the authors would like to acknowledge and extend our appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for their valuable support.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure. Authors have no conflict of interests, and the work was not supported or funded by any drug company.

  • Received December 19, 2020.
  • Accepted February 8, 2021.
  • Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License (CC BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Goldstein SR,
    2. Lumsden MA.
    Abnormal uterine bleeding in perimenopause. Climacteric 2017; 20: 414–420.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Deneris A.
    PALM-COEIN Nomenclature for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. J Midwifery Womens Health 2016; 61: 376–379.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Setiawan VW,
    2. Yang HP,
    3. Pike MC,
    4. McCann SE,
    5. Yu H,
    6. Xiang YB, et al.
    Type I and II endometrial cancers: have they different risk factors? J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 2607–2618.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Hüsing A,
    2. Dossus L,
    3. Ferrari P,
    4. Tjønneland A,
    5. Hansen L,
    6. Fagherazzi G, et al.
    An epidemiological model for prediction of endometrial cancer risk in Europe. Eur J Epidemiol 2016; 31: 51–60.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kaunitz AM.
    Abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-age women. JAMA 2019; 321: 2126–2127.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Wouk N,
    2. Helton M.
    Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Premenopausal Women. Am Fam Physician 2019; 99: 435–443.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hanegem VN,
    2. Prins MM,
    3. Bongers MY,
    4. Opmeer BC,
    5. Sahota DS,
    6. Mol BW, et al.
    The accuracy of endometrial sampling in women with postmenopausal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 197: 147–155.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bas¸aranoglu S,
    2. Agac¸ayak E,
    3. Hatırnaz S, et al.
    The diagnostic accuracy of endometrial sampling in endometrial hyperplasia. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med 2017; 23: 37e40.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    Practice Bulletin No. 149: Endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 1006–10026.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cancer stat facts: uterine cancer. [cited 202 November 11]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/corp.html
  11. 11.↵
    1. Sun Y,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Mao L,
    4. Wen J,
    5. Bai W.
    Prevalence of abnormal uterine bleeding according to new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classification in Chinese women of reproductive age: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e11457.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Whitaker L,
    2. Critchley HO.
    Abnormal uterine bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 34: 54–65.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Clarke MA,
    2. Long BJ,
    3. Del Mar Morillo A,
    4. Arbyn M,
    5. Bakkum-Gamez JN,
    6. Wentzensen N.
    Association of endometrial cancer risk with postmenopausal bleeding in women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2018; 178: 1210–1222.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Bray F,
    2. Ferlay J,
    3. Soerjomataram I,
    4. Siegel RL,
    5. Torre LA,
    6. Jemal A.
    Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394–424.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. de Haydu C,
    2. Black JD,
    3. Schwab CL,
    4. English DP,
    5. Santin AD.
    An update on the current pharmacotherapy for endometrial cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2016; 17: 489–499.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kurman RJ,
    2. Ellenson LH,
    3. Ronnett BM
    1. Ellenson LH,
    2. Ronnett BM,
    3. Kurman RJ.
    Precursor of Endometrial Carcinoma. In: Kurman RJ, Ellenson LH, Ronnett BM, editors. Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract. 7th edition. Switzerland (SW): Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2019. p. 440–458.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Giannella L,
    2. Delli Carpini G,
    3. Sopracordevole F,
    4. Papiccio M,
    5. Serri M,
    6. Giorda G, et al.
    Atypical endometrial hyperplasia and unexpected cancers at final histology: A study on endometrial sampling methods and risk factors. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10: 474.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Vetter MH,
    2. Smith B,
    3. Benedict J,
    4. Hade EM,
    5. Bixel K,
    6. Copeland LJ, et al.
    Preoperative predictors of endometrial cancer at time of hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia or complex atypical hyperplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222: 60.e1–60.e7.
  19. 19.↵
    1. Amant F,
    2. Mirza MR,
    3. Koskas M,
    4. Creutzberg CL.
    Cancer of the corpus uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018; 143 Suppl 2: 37–50.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Braun MM,
    2. Overbeek-Wager EA,
    3. Grumbo RJ.
    Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Cancer. Am Fam Physician 2016; 93: 468–474.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. Practice bulletin no. 136: management of abnormal uterine bleeding associated with ovulatory dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 176–185.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Giannella L,
    2. Delli Carpini G,
    3. Di Giuseppe J,
    4. Tsiroglou D,
    5. Papiccio M,
    6. Montanari M, et al.
    Atrophic endometrium in postmenopausal women referred to diagnostic hysteroscopy: a study to avoid unnecessary examinations. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2020; 24: 5217–5222.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Elkholi DGE,
    2. Nagy HM.
    Unexplained postmenopausal uterine bleeding from atrophic endometrium: Histopathological and hormonal studies. Middle East Fertility Society Journal 2015; 20: 262–270. Doi: 10.1016/j.mefs.2015.04.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Otify M,
    2. Fuller J,
    3. Ross J,
    4. Shaikh H,
    5. Johns J.
    Endometrial pathology in the postmenopausal woman-an evidence based approach to management. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2015; 17: 29–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Kolhe S.
    Management of abnormal uterine bleeding - focus on ambulatory hysteroscopy. Int J Womens Health 2018; 10: 127–136.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Nijkang NP,
    2. Anderson L,
    3. Markham R,
    4. Manconi F.
    Endometrial polyps: Pathogenesis, sequelae and treatment. SAGE Open Med 2019; 7: 2050312119848247.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kurman RJ,
    2. Ellenson LH,
    3. Ronnett BM
    1. Lastra RR,
    2. McCluggage WG and
    3. Ellenson LH.
    Benign diseases of the endometrium. In: Kurman RJ, Ellenson LH, Ronnett BM, editors. Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract. 7th edition. Switzerland (SW). Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2019. p. 404–405.
  28. 28.↵
    1. Song D,
    2. Feng X,
    3. Zhang Q,
    4. Xia E,
    5. Xiao Y,
    6. Xie W, et al.
    Prevalence and confounders of chronic endometritis in premenopausal women with abnormal bleeding or reproductive failure. Reprod Biomed Online 2018; 36: 78–83.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Park HJ,
    2. Kim YS,
    3. Yoon TK,
    4. Lee WS.
    Chronic endometritis and infertility. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2016; 43: 185–192.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    1. María VAC,
    2. Jorge DG.
    Chronic endometritis: an hidden pathology. Obstet Gynecol Int J 2020; 11: 155–156.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Chen X,
    3. Huang J,
    4. Wang CC,
    5. Yu MY,
    6. Laird S, et al.
    Comparison of the prevalence of chronic endometritis as determined by means of different diagnostic methods in women with and without reproductive failure. Fertil Steril 2018; 109: 832–839.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Cicinelli E,
    2. Bettocchi S,
    3. de Ziegler D,
    4. Loizzi V,
    5. Cormio G,
    6. Marinaccio M, et al.
    Chronic Endometritis, a Common Disease Hidden Behind Endometrial Polyps in Premenopausal Women: First Evidence From a Case-Control Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019; 26: 1346–1350.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Maybin JA,
    2. Critchley HO.
    Medical management of heavy menstrual bleeding. Womens Health (Lond) 2016; 12: 27–34.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    1. Colombo N,
    2. Creutzberg C,
    3. Amant F,
    4. Bosse T,
    5. González-Martín A,
    6. Ledermann J, et al.
    ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Endometrial Consensus Conference Working Group. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2016; 27: 16–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Garg K,
    2. Soslow RA.
    Endometrial carcinoma in women aged 40 years and younger. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014; 138: 335–342.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Giannella L,
    2. Mfuta K,
    3. Setti T,
    4. Cerami LB,
    5. Bergamini E,
    6. Boselli F.
    A risk-scoring model for the prediction of endometrial cancer among symptomatic postmenopausal women with endometrial thickness > 4 mm. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 130569.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Pennant ME,
    2. Mehta R,
    3. Moody P,
    4. Hackett G,
    5. Prentice A,
    6. Sharp SJ, et al.
    Premenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding and risk of endometrial cancer. BJOG 2017; 124: 404–411.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    1. Giannella L,
    2. Cerami LB,
    3. Setti T,
    4. Bergamini E,
    5. Boselli F.
    Prediction of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer among premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Biomed Res Int 2019; 2019: 8598152.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    1. Harmanli OH,
    2. Shunmugham S,
    3. Shen T,
    4. Houck KL,
    5. Chatwani AJ.
    The negative predictive value of “inadequate” endometrial biopsy in diagnosing endometrial neoplasia. J Gynecol Surg 2004; 20: 13–16.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    1. Giannella L,
    2. Mfuta K,
    3. Setti T,
    4. Boselli F,
    5. Bergamini E,
    6. Cerami LB.
    Diagnostic accuracy of endometrial thickness for the detection of intra-uterine pathologies and appropriateness of performed hysteroscopies among asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 177: 29–33.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 42 (3)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 42, Issue 3
1 Mar 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pathological spectrum of endometrial biopsies in Saudi women with abnormal uterine bleeding
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Pathological spectrum of endometrial biopsies in Saudi women with abnormal uterine bleeding
Sufia Husain, Reema S. Al Hammad, Aljawhara K. Alduhaysh, Mada M. AlBatly, Ammar Alrikabi
Saudi Medical Journal Mar 2021, 42 (3) 270-279; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.3.20200814

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Pathological spectrum of endometrial biopsies in Saudi women with abnormal uterine bleeding
Sufia Husain, Reema S. Al Hammad, Aljawhara K. Alduhaysh, Mada M. AlBatly, Ammar Alrikabi
Saudi Medical Journal Mar 2021, 42 (3) 270-279; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.3.20200814
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying individuals at risk of post-stroke depression
  • Hematological parameters in recent and past dengue infections in Jazan Province, Saudi Arabia
  • Longitudinal analysis of foodborne disease outbreaks in Saudi Arabia
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • abnormal uterine bleeding
  • age stratified
  • endometrial sampling and pathology
  • menopause
  • endometrial hyperplasia
  • carcinoma

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire