Osseointegrated device placement with minimally invasive surgery

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Tjellström A,
   2. Håkansson B,
   3. Granström G.

   Bone-anchored hearing aids: current status in adults and children. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2001; 34: 337–364.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Reinfeldt S,
   2. Håkansson B,
   3. Taghavi H,
   4. Eeg-Olofsson M.

   New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review. Med Devices (Auckl) 2015; 8: 79–93.

   OpenUrl
3. 3.↵
   1. Johansson M,
   2. Holmberg M.

   Design and clinical evaluation of MIPS - a new perspective on tissue preservation. ResearchGate. [Updated 2015; 2019 Mar 3]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin-Johansson/publication/283015072_Design_and_clinical_evaluation_of_MIPS_-_A_new_perspective_on_tissue_preservation/links/56265c7908aed3d3f13838b2/Design-and-clinical-evaluation-of-MIPS-A-new-perspective-on-tissue-preservation.pdf
4. 4.↵
   1. Kara A,
   2. Guven M,
   3. Sinan Yilmaz M,
   4. Demir D,
   5. Adigul Ç,
   6. Durgut M, et al.

   Comparison of 2 different bone anchored hearing instruments: Baha-5 vs Ponto-plus. Acta Otolaryngol 2019; 139: 517–521.

   OpenUrl
5. 5.↵
   1. Wang Y,
   2. Fan X,
   3. Wang P,
   4. Fan Y,
   5. Chen X.

   Hearing improvement with softband and implanted bone-anchored hearing devices and modified implantation surgery in patients with bilateral microtia-atresia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 104: 120–125.

   OpenUrl
6. 6.↵
   1. Lippmann E,
   2. Pritchett C,
   3. Ittner C,
   4. Hoff SR.

   Transcutaneous osseointegrated implants for pediatric patients with aural atresia. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 144: 704–709.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Baker S,
   2. Centric A,
   3. Chennupati SK.

   Innovation in abutment-free bone-anchored hearing devices in children: updated results and experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 79: 1667–1672.

   OpenUrl
8. 8.↵
   1. Borton SA,
   2. Mauze E,
   3. Lieu JE.

   Quality of life in children with unilateral hearing loss: a pilot study. Am J Audiol 2010; 19: 61–72.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Popescu MV,
   2. Polley DB.

   Monaural deprivation disrupts development of binaural selectivity in auditory midbrain and cortex. Neuron 2010; 65: 718–731.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Kim G,
    2. Ju HM,
    3. Lee SH,
    4. Kim HS,
    5. Kwon JA,
    6. Seo YJ.

    Efficacy of bone-anchored hearing aids in single-sided deafness: a systematic review. Otol Neurotol 2017; 38: 473–483.

    OpenUrl
11. 11.↵
    1. Celikgun B,
    2. Kalcioglu MT.

    Assessment of discrimination ability in ipsilateral and contralateral ears with a unilateral bone-anchored hearing system. Ear Nose Throat J 2017; 96: 297–310.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Kiringoda R,
    2. Lustig LR.

    A meta-analysis of the complications associated with osseointegrated hearing aids. Otol Neurotol 2013; 34: 790–794.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Dumon T,
    2. Medina M,
    3. Sperling NM.

    Punch and drill: implantation of bone anchored hearing device through a minimal skin punch incision versus implantation with dermatome and soft tissue reduction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2016; 125: 199–206.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Gordon SA,
    2. Coelho DH.

    Minimally invasive surgery for osseointegrated auditory implants: a comparison of linear versus punch techniques. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 152: 1089–1093.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Calon TGA,
    2. Johansson ML,
    3. de Bruijn AJG,
    4. van den Berge H,
    5. Wagenaar M,
    6. Eichhorn E, et al.

    Minimally invasive Ponto surgery versus the linear incision technique with soft tissue preservation for bone conduction hearing implants: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Otol Neurotol 2018; 39: 882–893.

    OpenUrl