“Smart Optometry” phone-based application as a visual acuity testing tool among pediatric population

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Jonas DE,
   2. Amick HR,
   3. Wallace IF,
   4. Feltner C,
   5. Vander Schaaf EB,
   6. Brown CL, et al.

   U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Syntheses, formerly Systematic Evidence Reviews. Vision Screening in Children Ages 6 Months to 5 Years: A Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017.
2. 2.↵
   1. Fu Z,
   2. Hong H,
   3. Su Z,
   4. Lou B,
   5. Pan CW,
   6. Liu H

   . Global prevalence of amblyopia and disease burden projections through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol 2020; 104: 1164–1170.

   OpenUrl
3. 3.↵
   1. Silva BM,
   2. Rodrigues JJ,
   3. de la Torre Díez I,
   4. López-Coronado M,
   5. Saleem K

   . Mobile-health: A review of current state in 2015. J Biomed Inform 2015; 56: 265–672.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Choudhari NS,
   2. Chandran P,
   3. Rao HL,
   4. Jonnadula GB,
   5. Addepalli UK,
   6. Senthil S, et al.

   LVPEI Glaucoma Epidemiology and Molecular Genetic Study: teleophthalmology screening for angle-closure disease in an underserved region. Eye (Lond). 2020; 34: 1399–1405.

   OpenUrl
5. 5.
   1. Kawaguchi A,
   2. Sharafeldin N,
   3. Sundaram A,
   4. Campbell S,
   5. Tennant M,
   6. Rudnisky C, et al.

   Tele-Ophthalmology for Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Telemed J E Health 2018; 24: 301–308.

   OpenUrl
6. 6.↵
   1. Tan IJ,
   2. Dobson LP,
   3. Bartnik S,
   4. Muir J,
   5. Turner AW

   . Real-time teleophthalmology versus face-to-face consultation: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2017; 23: 629–638.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Zhao L,
   2. Stinnett SS,
   3. Prakalapakorn SG

   . Visual Acuity Assessment and Vision Screening Using a Novel Smartphone Application. J Pediatr 2019; 213: 203–10.e1.

   OpenUrl
8. 8.↵
   1. Ichhpujani P,
   2. Thakur S

   . Smart resources in ophthalmology: Applications and social networking Singapore: Springer; 2018.
9. 9.↵
   1. Satgunam P,
   2. Thakur M,
   3. Sachdeva V,
   4. Reddy S,
   5. Rani PK

   . Validation of visual acuity applications for teleophthalmology during COVID-19. Indian J Ophthalmol 2021; 69: 385–390.

   OpenUrl
10. 10.↵
    1. Yeung WK,
    2. Dawes P,
    3. Pye A,
    4. Neil M,
    5. Aslam T,
    6. Dickinson C, et al.

    eHealth tools for the self-testing of visual acuity: a scoping review. NPJ Digit Med 2019; 2: 82.

    OpenUrl
11. 11.↵
    1. Yakel JP,
    2. Meacham KJ,
    3. Glave AP,
    4. Didier JJ,
    5. Williams ML,
    6. Waters C, et al.

    Accuracy of smartphone application to monitor heart rate. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2019; 59: 1281–124.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Donahue SP,
    2. Baker CN

    . Procedures for the Evaluation of the Visual System by Pediatricians. Pediatrics 2016; 137.
13. 13.↵
    1. Bland JM,
    2. Altman DG

    . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–10.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Brown CL,
    2. Montez K,
    3. Amati JB,
    4. Simeonsson K,
    5. Townsend JD,
    6. Orr CJ, et al.

    Impact of COVID-19 on pediatric primary care visits at four academic institutions in the Carolinas. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 5734.

    OpenUrl
15. 15.↵
    1. Shayganfard M,
    2. Mahdavi F,
    3. Haghighi M,
    4. Sadeghi Bahmani D,
    5. Brand S

    . Health anxiety predicts postponing or cancelling routine medical health care appointments among women in Perinatal Stage during the Covid-19 lockdown. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 8272.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Núñez A,
    2. Sreeganga SD,
    3. Ramaprasad A

    . Access to Healthcare during COVID-19. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 2980.

    OpenUrl
17. 17.↵
    1. Muscat JE,
    2. Malkin MG,
    3. Thompson S,
    4. Shore RE,
    5. Stellman SD,
    6. McRee D, et al.

    Handheld cellular telephone use and risk of brain cancer. Jama 2000; 284: 3001–3007.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Becker S,
    2. Miron-Shatz T,
    3. Schumacher N,
    4. Krocza J,
    5. Diamantidis C,
    6. Albrecht UV

    . mHealth 2.0: experiences, possibilities, and perspectives. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2014; 2: e24.

    OpenUrl
19. 19.↵
    1. Zhang ZT,
    2. Zhang SC,
    3. Huang XG,
    4. Liang LY

    . A pilot trial of the iPad tablet computer as a portable device for visual acuity testing. J Telemed Telecare 2013; 19: 55–59.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. de Venecia B,
    2. Bradfield Y,
    3. Trane RM,
    4. Bareiro A,
    5. Scalamogna M

    . Validation of Peek Acuity application in pediatric screening programs in Paraguay. Int J Ophthalmol 2018; 11: 1384–1389.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 21.↵
    1. Rono HK,
    2. Bastawrous A,
    3. Macleod D,
    4. Wanjala E,
    5. Di Tanna GL,
    6. Weiss HA, et al.

    Smartphone-based screening for visual impairment in Kenyan school children: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health 2018; 6: e924–e32.

    OpenUrl
22. 22.↵
    1. Estacio EV,
    2. Whittle R,
    3. Protheroe J

    . The digital divide: Examining socio-demographic factors associated with health literacy, access and use of internet to seek health information. J Health Psychol 2019; 24: 1668–1675.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Bastawrous A,
    2. Rono HK,
    3. Livingstone IA,
    4. Weiss HA,
    5. Jordan S,
    6. Kuper H, et al.

    Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test (Peek Acuity) for clinical practice and community-based fieldwork. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015; 133: 930–937.

    OpenUrl
24. 24.↵
    1. Horwood AM,
    2. Griffiths HJ,
    3. Carlton J,
    4. Mazzone P,
    5. Channa A,
    6. Nordmann M, et al.

    Scope and costs of autorefraction and photoscreening for childhood amblyopia-a systematic narrative review in relation to the EUSCREEN project data. Eye (Lond) 2021; 35: 739–752.

    OpenUrl