Surgicel plug technique versus endoclose technique for port-site closure post minimally invasive (robotic and laparoscopic) surgeries

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Mudgal MM,
   2. Kothiya PK,
   3. Kushwah N,
   4. Singh R.

   Port site complications following laparoscopic surgeries: a prospective study. Int Surg 2018; 5: 598–601.

   OpenUrl
2. 2.↵
   1. Kim HY,
   2. Lee SJ.

   Prospective Randomized Control Study on the Efficiency and Safety of a Novel Port-site Closure Device, the EZ-close Port-site Closure System. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2019; 29: 335–338.

   OpenUrl
3. 3.
   1. Helgstrand F,
   2. Rosenberg J,
   3. Bisgaard T.

   Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic surgery: a qualitative systematic review. Hernia 2011; 15: 113.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.
   1. Hussain A,
   2. Mahmood H,
   3. Singhal T,
   4. Balakrishnan S,
   5. Nicholls J, and
   6. El-Hasani S.

   Long-Term Study of Port-Site Incisional Hernia After Laparoscopic Procedures. JSLS 2009; 13: 346–349.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Siqueira TM Jr.,
   2. Paterson RF,
   3. Kuo RL,
   4. Stevens LH,
   5. Lingeman JE,
   6. Shalhav AL.

   The Use of Blunt-tipped 12-mm Trocars Without Fascial Closure in Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy. JSLS 2004; 8: 47–50.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Elashry OM,
   2. Nakada SY,
   3. Wolf JS Jr.,
   4. Figenshau RS,
   5. McDougall EM,
   6. Clayman RV.

   Comparative clinical study of port-closure techniques following laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 1996; 183: 335–344.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Nakada SY

   1. Lowry PS,
   2. Moon TD,
   3. DÕAlessandro A

   , Nakada SY Symptomatic port-site hernia associated with a nonbladed trocar after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Endourol 2003; 17: 493–494.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Shetty A,
   2. Adiyat KT.

   Comparison between hand suture and Carter-Thomason needle closure of port sites in laparoscopy. Urol J 2014; 11: 1768–1771.

   OpenUrl
9. 9.↵
   1. del Junco M,
   2. Okhunov Z,
   3. Juncal S,
   4. Yoon R,
   5. Landman J.

   Evaluation of a novel trocar-site closure and comparison with a standard Carter-Thomason closure device. J Endourol 2014; 28814–818.
10. 10.↵
    1. Genyk Y,
    2. Kato T,
    3. Pomposelli JJ,
    4. Wright JK Jr.,
    5. Sher LS,
    6. Tetens V, et al.

    Fibrin Sealant Patch (TachoSil) vs Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Patch (Surgicel Original) for the Secondary Treatment of Local Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Coll Surg 2016: 261–268.
11. 11.↵
    1. Hubsher C,
    2. Talug C,
    3. Salkini M.

    MP37-10 trocar site herniation following robotic renal surgery in an obese population: a comparison of VICRYL Fascia closure and Surgicel^® plugs. J Urol 2014; 191, 4, e395.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Krishnanath Gaitonde, Goutham Vemana,
    2. Nilesh Patil,
    3. James Donovan

    . Novel technique for port site closure during laparoscopic/robotic surgery. J Urol 2013; 189: e342.

    OpenUrl
13. 13.↵
    1. Moazin MS,
    2. Alsuwailim AM,
    3. Albalawi KM,
    4. Almutair MS,
    5. Alaliyah AA,
    6. Zakaria OM, et al.

    A novel technique: hemostatic agents for port-site closure post robotic-assisted urological surgeries. a pilot study. Urol Nephrol Open Access J 2020; 8: 66–68.

    OpenUrl
14. 14.↵
    1. Moreno-Sanz C,
    2. Picazo-Yeste JS,
    3. Manzanera-Díaz M,
    4. Herrero-bogajo, M. L.,
    5. Cortina-Oliva, J.,
    6. Tadeo-Ruiz, G.

    Prevention of trocar site hernias: description of the safe port plug technique and preliminary results. Surg Innov 2008; 15: 100–104.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Gaunay GS,
    2. Elsamra SE,
    3. Richstone L.

    Trocars: site selection, instrumentation, and overcoming complications. J Endourol 2016; 30: 833–843.

    OpenUrl