Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

The prevalence and risk factors for hiatal hernia among patients undergoing endoscopy

A retrospective analysis

Majid A. Alsahafi, Najla A. Alajhar, Amjad O. Almahyawi, Hadeel H. Alsulami, Wejdan A. Alghamdi, Lama A. Alharbi, Afnan S. Alsulami, Jumana T. Aljehani, Saad S. Alkhowaiter and Mahmoud H. Mosli
Saudi Medical Journal May 2023, 44 (5) 509-512; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2023.44.5.20220903
Majid A. Alsahafi
From the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alsahafi, Alajhar, Almahyawi, Alsulami, Alghamdi, Alharbi, Alsulami, Aljehanil, Mosli), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah; and from the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alkhowaiter), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD, MHSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Najla A. Alajhar
From the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alsahafi, Alajhar, Almahyawi, Alsulami, Alghamdi, Alharbi, Alsulami, Aljehanil, Mosli), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah; and from the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alkhowaiter), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amjad O. Almahyawi
From the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alsahafi, Alajhar, Almahyawi, Alsulami, Alghamdi, Alharbi, Alsulami, Aljehanil, Mosli), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah; and from the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alkhowaiter), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hadeel H. Alsulami
From the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alsahafi, Alajhar, Almahyawi, Alsulami, Alghamdi, Alharbi, Alsulami, Aljehanil, Mosli), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah; and from the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alkhowaiter), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wejdan A. Alghamdi
From the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alsahafi, Alajhar, Almahyawi, Alsulami, Alghamdi, Alharbi, Alsulami, Aljehanil, Mosli), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah; and from the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alkhowaiter), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lama A. Alharbi
From the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alsahafi, Alajhar, Almahyawi, Alsulami, Alghamdi, Alharbi, Alsulami, Aljehanil, Mosli), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah; and from the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alkhowaiter), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Afnan S. Alsulami
From the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alsahafi, Alajhar, Almahyawi, Alsulami, Alghamdi, Alharbi, Alsulami, Aljehanil, Mosli), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah; and from the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alkhowaiter), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jumana T. Aljehani
From the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alsahafi, Alajhar, Almahyawi, Alsulami, Alghamdi, Alharbi, Alsulami, Aljehanil, Mosli), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah; and from the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alkhowaiter), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saad S. Alkhowaiter
From the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alsahafi, Alajhar, Almahyawi, Alsulami, Alghamdi, Alharbi, Alsulami, Aljehanil, Mosli), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah; and from the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alkhowaiter), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mahmoud H. Mosli
From the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alsahafi, Alajhar, Almahyawi, Alsulami, Alghamdi, Alharbi, Alsulami, Aljehanil, Mosli), Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah; and from the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Alkhowaiter), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of hiatal hernia (HH) and its association with age, gender, and body mass index (BMI).

Methods: We retrospectively included patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at an academic tertiary care hospital. Data were collected on the presence of HH as well as patient demographics including age, gender, and BMI. Univariate and multivariate analysis were done to determine risk factors for HH.

Results: A total of 2805 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 48.6 (±18.6) years and males constituted 28.8% of the study population. The mean BMI was 29.7 (±8.6) kg/m². The prevalence of HH was 29.8% among all patients and 48.6% among those who underwent EGD for gastroesophageal reflux disease–related indications. There was no significant association between HH and female gender (OR 1.04, 95%CI: 0.88 -1.26, p=0.53), older age (OR 0.77, 95%CI: 0.72 - 1.06, p=0.19) or BMI (OR 1.07, 95%CI: 0.9 – 1.2, p=0.39).

Conclusion: The prevalence of HH was 28.9% based on this large endoscopy-based population. We found no association between HH and gender, age, or BMI.

Keywords:
  • hiatal hernia
  • GERD
  • epidemiology
  • gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common gastrointestinal disease with an estimated prevalence of 18-27% in the United Sates population.1 The reported prevalence of GERD in Saudi Arabia is as high as 45%.2 Patients with GERD may present with typical or atypical symptoms and are at risk for GERD-related complications.3 Gastroesophageal reflux disease impacts the patient’s quality of life and creates a significant economic burden on the healthcare system.4

Among the different risk factors for GERD, hiatal hernia (HH) is a well-recognized anatomical predisposing condition.5-7 Hiatal hernia is also a risk factor for GERD complications. It increases the risk of GERD through different mechanisms, including impaired lower esophageal sphincter pressure, transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, impaired esophageal acid clearance, and delayed gastric emptying.7 The prevalence of HH in Western populations is reportedly 14.5-22%.8-10 Previous studies reported potential risk factors for HH, including older age, gender, and obesity.11-18 The prevalence of HH reportedly increases substantially with age.18 Male gender has inconsistently been associated with a higher prevalence of HH as well.11-18

Although GERD is common in Saudi Arabia, the prevalence of HH and its risk factors have not yet been established. Thus, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of HH and assess its association with gender, age, body mass index (BMI) among a Saudi population.

Methods

This was a retrospective study that was performed at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, an academic tertiary care center in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board. The endoscopy database was reviewed from May 2014 to December 2018. All patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) were included. Patients younger than 18 years were excluded. For patients who underwent more than one EGD, only the first procedure was included. The procedures were carried out by a gastroenterology consultant or a gastroenterology fellow under supervision. The presence of a sliding HH was determined endoscopically by observing the discordance between diaphragmatic impingement and the esophagogastric junction. The collected data included patient demographic variables, height, weight, and EGD indication.

Statistical analysis

Frequencies and percentages are used to summarize the categorical variables, while mean and standard deviation are used to express continuous variables. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine the association between HH and different variables, including age, gender, and BMI. Two-tailed p-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The statistical analysis was performed using R statistical software.

Results

A total of 2805 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 48.6 (±18.6) years, and 28.8% were older than 60 years. Male patients constituted 38.8% of the study population. The BMI data were available for 2588 patients. The mean BMI was 29.7 (± 8.6) kg/m². Table 1 shows the general characteristics of the study population.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

- Characteristics of the study population.

Among all patients, 837 (29.8%) were reported to have HH endoscopically. The prevalence of HH was 28.6% among men and 30.5% among women. The prevalence of HH was 30.6% among patients aged <60 years and 27.6% among those aged >60 years. For patients with a BMI <30, the prevalence of HH was 28.7%, while for obese patients (BMI >30), it was 30.6%.

For the patients who had HH, 37.2% were male, the mean age was 47.3 (± 18) years, and the mean BMI was 30.28 (± 8). For patients without HH, 39.4% were male, the mean age was 49.2 (±18) years, and the mean BMI was 29.5 (±8.6). Among 226 patients who underwent EGD for GERD-related indications (refractory GERD, screening, preoperative), the prevalence of HH was 48.6%.

Table 2 shows the univariate analysis result, while Tables 3 shows multivariate analysis result. There was no significant association between HH and gender, age >60 years, or obesity (BMI >30).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

- Univariate analysis of the risk factors for hiatal hernia.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

- Multivariate analysis of the risk factors for hiatal hernia.

Discussion

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common medical problem worldwide for which HH is a well-recognized common risk factor. In this large study, we found the prevalence of HH was 29.8% among patients who underwent EGD for any indication and 48.7% among those who underwent EGD for GERD-related indications. The prevalence of HH in our study was slightly higher than that reported in a meta-analysis, which reported it as 20.3%.8 In contrast, the prevalence of HH was 49% in a UK study.19 The variation observed in the prevalence of these results could be attributed to differences in the included patient populations.

Although several factors are associated with the risk of developing HH, we could not establish a relationship between HH and gender, age, or BMI. Older age was previously reported as associated with HH.18,20 This could be caused by age-related fibromuscular degeneration and loss of elasticity of the structures surrounding the diaphragmatic hiatus.11 However, other studies reported no association between age and HH, similar to our findings.21

In our study, the prevalence of HH was similar in men (28.6%) and women (30.5%). The effect of gender on HH prevalence has not been consistent in the literature. A systematic review reported a higher prevalence of HH among men versus women (56.7% versus [vs.] 43.3%).1 In contrast, a higher prevalence among women was reported in a US study (66% vs. 34%).18 Thus, we speculate that gender may not have a direct impact on HH development; rather, other factors may have contributed to the differences.

In the present study, no association was observed between obesity, as defined by BMI, and HH, which resembles what has been reported in other studies.21 In contrast, a meta-analysis concluded a significant association between BMI and HH.11 Variations in the included populations may account for these different findings. However, abdominal obesity, as measured by waist circumference, is likely more important than BMI.21

Strength and limitations

The strengths of our study include the fact that it is the largest study to date to report the prevalence of HH in the Saudi population. We acknowledge the presence of several limitations, including the inherent limitations that characterize the retrospective design and the single - center nature. Hiatal hernia details were collected from endoscopy reports, and there is likely to be variation in the observation and reporting of HH among endoscopists. We were unable to collect data on other potential risk factors for HH, such as waist circumference. Future multicenter prospective studies are needed to overcome the limitations of our study.

In conclusion, the prevalence of HH in the Saudi population was 28.9% in this large endoscopy-based population. We found no association between HH and gender, age, or BMI.

Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledge Editage (www.editage.com) for the English language editing.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure. Authors have no conflict of interests, and the work was not supported or funded by any drug company.

  • Received December 18, 2022.
  • Accepted April 9, 2023.
  • Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal

This is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. El-Serag HB,
    2. Sweet S,
    3. Winchester CC,
    4. Dent J.
    Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut 2014; 63: 871–880.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Almadi MA,
    2. Almousa MA,
    3. Althwainy AF,
    4. Altamimi AM,
    5. Alamoudi HO,
    6. Alshamrani HS et al.
    Prevalence of symptoms of gastroesopahgeal reflux in a cohort of Saudi Arabians: a study of 1265 subjects. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 248–254.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Vakil N.
    Disease definition, clinical manifestations, epidemiology and natural history of GERD. Best Prac Res Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 24: 759–764.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Ofman JJ.
    The economic and quality-of-life impact of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: S8–S14.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Katz PO,
    2. Dunbar KB,
    3. Schnoll-Sussman FH,
    4. Greer KB,
    5. Yadlapati R,
    6. Spechler SJ.
    ACG clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117: 27–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.
    1. Murray JA,
    2. Camilleri M.
    The fall and rise of the hiatal hernia. Gastroenterology 2000; 119: 1779–1781.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hyun JJ,
    2. Bak YT.
    Clinical significance of hiatal hernia. Gut Liver 2011; 5: 267–277.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Cronstedt J,
    2. Carling L,
    3. Vestergaard P,
    4. Berglund J.
    Oesophageal disease revealed by endoscopy in 1,000 patients referred primarily for gastroscopy. Acta Med Scand 1978; 204 : 413–416.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Berstad A,
    2. Weberg R,
    3. Larsen IF,
    4. Hoel B,
    5. Hauer-Jensen M.
    Relationship of hiatus hernia to reflux oesophagitis a prospective study of coincidence, using endoscopy. Scan J Gastroenterol 1986; 21: 55–58.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Wright RA,
    2. Hurwitz AL.
    Relationship of hiatal hernia to endoscopically proved reflux esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci 1979; 24: 311–313.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Menon S,
    2. Trudgill N.
    Risk factors in the etiology of hiatus hernia: a meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 23: 133–138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.
    1. Amano K,
    2. Adachi K,
    3. Katsube T,
    4. Watanabe M,
    5. Kinoshita Y.
    Role of hiatus hernia and gastric mucosal atrophy in the development of reflux esophagitis in the elderly. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001; 16: 132–136.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.
    1. Becher A,
    2. Dent J.
    Systematic review: ageing and gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease symptoms, oesophageal function and reflux oesophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33: 442–454.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.
    1. Furukawa N,
    2. Iwakiri R,
    3. Koyama T,
    4. Okamoto K,
    5. Yoshida T,
    6. Kashiwagi Y et al.
    Proportion of reflux esophagitis in 6010 Japanese adults: prospective evaluation by endoscopy. J Gastroenterol 1999; 34: 441–444.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.
    1. Kim JH,
    2. Hwang JK,
    3. Kim J,
    4. Lee SD,
    5. Lee BJ,
    6. Kim JS et al.
    Endoscopic findings around the gastroesophageal junction: an experience from a tertiary hospital in Korea. Korean J Intern Med 2008; 23: 127–133.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.
    1. Li W,
    2. Zhang ST,
    3. Yu ZL.
    Clinical and endoscopic features of Chinese reflux esophagitis patients. World J Gastroenterol WJG. 2008; 14: 1866–1871.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.
    1. Loffeld RJ,
    2. Van der Putten AB.
    Newly developing hiatus hernia: a survey in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 17: 542–544.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kim J,
    2. Hiura GT,
    3. Oelsner EC,
    4. Yin X,
    5. Barr RG,
    6. Smith BM et al.
    Hiatal hernia prevalence and natural history on non-contrast CT in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2021; 8: e000565.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kang JY,
    2. Ho KY.
    Different prevalences of reflux oesophagitis and hiatus hernia among dyspeptic patients in England and Singapore. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999; 11: 845–850.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Amano K,
    2. Adachi K,
    3. Katsube T,
    4. Watanabe M,
    5. Kinoshita Y.
    Role of hiatus hernia and gastric mucosal atrophy in the development of reflux esophagitis in the elderly. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001; 16: 132–136.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Wani SB,
    2. Bansal A,
    3. Rastogi A,
    4. Pondugula K,
    5. Hall SB,
    6. Higbee A, et al.
    T1955 presence of hiatal hernia (HH) is not related to obesity and increasing age. Gastroenterology 2008; 4: A-587.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 44 (5)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 44, Issue 5
1 May 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The prevalence and risk factors for hiatal hernia among patients undergoing endoscopy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
The prevalence and risk factors for hiatal hernia among patients undergoing endoscopy
Majid A. Alsahafi, Najla A. Alajhar, Amjad O. Almahyawi, Hadeel H. Alsulami, Wejdan A. Alghamdi, Lama A. Alharbi, Afnan S. Alsulami, Jumana T. Aljehani, Saad S. Alkhowaiter, Mahmoud H. Mosli
Saudi Medical Journal May 2023, 44 (5) 509-512; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.5.20220903

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The prevalence and risk factors for hiatal hernia among patients undergoing endoscopy
Majid A. Alsahafi, Najla A. Alajhar, Amjad O. Almahyawi, Hadeel H. Alsulami, Wejdan A. Alghamdi, Lama A. Alharbi, Afnan S. Alsulami, Jumana T. Aljehani, Saad S. Alkhowaiter, Mahmoud H. Mosli
Saudi Medical Journal May 2023, 44 (5) 509-512; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.5.20220903
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Exploring communication challenges with children and parents among pharmacists in Saudi Arabia
  • Exploring hypothyroidism’s effects on lipid profiles
  • Assessment of asthma control levels in a tertiary hospital
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • hiatal hernia
  • GERD
  • epidemiology
  • gastroesophageal reflux disease

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire