Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Review ArticleReview Article
Open Access

Molecular pathology of colorectal cancer

The Saudi situation in perspective

Abdulaziz Alfahed
Saudi Medical Journal September 2023, 44 (9) 836-847; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2023.44.9.20230257
Abdulaziz Alfahed
From the Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Abdulaziz Alfahed
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    - Molecular pathology of colorectal cancer syndromes from Saudi patients.

    SyndromesGermline alterationsMolecular methodologySample sizeReferences
    Lynch syndromePMS2 c.1376C>G, p.S459X, MLH1 c.1652A>C, p. N551T MSH2 c.2262-2267 delTTCTAC, p.T756-Y757 del MSH2 c.1226_1227delAG MSH2 c.1964.delT, p. V655fs MSH2 c.289C>T, Q97* MSH6 c.3475insT, p. Y1159fs MSH6 c.3475insTMMR protein by IHC, MSI, and BRAF mutation testing and deep sequencing2.2% of all CRC (N=1207)19,20
    Lynch syndromeMSH2 c.737A>T, p.K246I MSH2 c. 2262_2267del, p.S755_T756del MSH2 c.367-? __1276+? Del MSH2 c.2089T>C, p.C697R MSH2 c. 2038C>T, p.R680* MLH1 c.62C>T, p.A21V MLH1 c.1961C>T, p.P654L MLH1 c.677G>A, p.R226Q MLH1 c.454-?_545+?delMMR protein by IHC, MSI, BRAF mutation testing, MLPA, deep sequencing, and Sanger sequencing7.2% of all CRC (N=284)21
    Lynch syndromeDeletion of chromosomal regions: 2p21-2p16.3 (MSH2, MSH6, and EPCAM) 3p23-3p14.2 (MLH1) 7p22.1 (PMS2) 1p34.1-1p33 (MUTYH)Whole genome comparative genomic hybridization arrayN=12 (LS patients)24
    FAP syndromePMS2 c.1376C>G, p.S459XWESOne case report19
    • FAP: familial adenomatous polyposis, MMR: mismatch repair, IHC: immunohistochemistry, MSI: microsatellite instability, BRAF: B-Raf, MLPA: multiplex ligation probe amplification, WES: whole-exome sequencing, CRC: colorectal cancer, LS: Lynch syndrome

    • View popup
    Table 2

    - Genetic risks for colorectal cancer in Saudi patients.

    Genetic lociStudy approachNumber of CRC casesMolecular methodologiesRisk patternsReferences
    ABCC1 C218TCase-controlN=51, 65 controlsPCR-RFLP and DNA sequencing (Sanger)Increased CRC risk, OR=3.440
    ADIPOQ G276TCase-controlN=60, 60 controlsPCR-RFLPIncreased CRC risk, OR=2.6441
    CYP1A1wt/*2ACase-controlN=92, 79 controlsPCR-RFLPIncreased CRC risk, OR=3.6542
    GSTM1Case-controlN=80, 78 controlsDiplex PCRIncreased CRC risk, OR=3.743
    TP53 rs1042522Case-controlN=80, 78 controlsTaqMan real-time PCR assaysIncreased CRC risk, OR=1.643
    KIR 2DS1, 2DS2, 2DS3, 2DS5, and 3DS1Case-controlN=70, 70 controlsPCRIncreased CRC risk, OR=8.6-fold, 3-fold, 2.5-fold, 4.5-fold, and 16.25-fold44
    IL17A rs2275913: GA and AA genotypesCase-controlN=117, 100 controlsTaqMan allelic discrimination assay (PCR)Increased CRC risk, OR=2-fold and 2.8-fold45
    NOTCH3 rs1043994: G>ACase-controlN=134, 139 controlsTaqMan allelic discrimination assay (PCR)Increased CRC risk in males, OR=1.97146
    PARP1 K933N and K945N ‎Case-controlN=50, 50 controlsPCR and Sanger sequencingIncreased CRC risk OR=3.1429 for K933N G>T heterozygote; OR=2.5714 for K945N G>T heterozygote47
    PRNCR1 rs1456315: CC genotypeCase-controlN=144, 130 controlsTaqMan assaysIncreased CRC risk, OR=2.0948
    RETN rs1862513 and rs375367Case-controlN=60, 60 controlsPCR-RFLPIncreased CRC risk, OR=2.48 (rs1862513); OR=6.5 (rs375367)49
    TDG rs4135113Case-controlN=100, 192 controlsTaqMan genotypingIncreased CRC risk, OR>3.6; OR=5 in those >57 years50
    TLR9 rs352139Case-controlN=115, 102 controlsTaqMan allelic discrimination assay (PCR)Increased CRC risk for rectal cancers, OR=3.552 and 1.809 for GG genotype and G allele51
    TNFA rs361525 (G238A)Case-controlN=100, 100 controlsTaqMan allelic discrimination assayIncreased CRC risk, OR=14.663 for AA genotype and 7.647 for the A allele52
    TSLP rs10043985Case-controlN=112, 108 controlsTaqMan genotyping assayIncreased CRC risk, OR=16.52 for AC genotype and 10.837 for the C allele53
    VDR1 ApaI rs797232Case-controlN=100, 100 controlsPCR amplification, followed by Sanger sequencingIncreased CRC risk, OR=1.778 in patients >57 years (rs797232 and C allele)54
    VDR1 TaqI rs731236Case-controlN=132, 124 controlsPCR-RFLPIncreased CRC risk, OR=6.1855
    XRCC1 A399GCase-controlN=100, 100 controlsPCR-RFLP and PCR-CTPPIncreased CRC risk, OR=2.156
    ABCB1 G2677TCase-controlN=62, 100 controlsPCR-RFLPReduced CRC risk, OR=0.004 for heterozygotes GT and 0.005 homozygotes TT57
    ADIPOQ T45GCase-controlN=60, 60 controlsPCR-RFLPReduced CRC risk, OR=0.41 for the G allele41
    CTNNB1 rs4135385Case-controlN=122, 110 controlsTaqMan assaysReduced CRC risk, OR=0.092 for GG genotype58
    LRP6 rs2284396Case-controlN=122, 110 controlsTaqMan assaysReduced CRC risk, OR=0.250 for the CC genotype in cases >57 years; OR=0.561 for the C allele58
    SFRP3 rs7775Case-controlN=122, 110 controlsTaqMan assaysReduced CRC risk, OR=0.397 for the Gly allele in female gender58
    CYP19A1 rs4774585 rs4775936Case-controlN=100, 100 controlsTaqMan genotyping by real-time PCRReduced CRC risk, OR=0.28 for rs4774585 AA genotype in the male gender; OR=0.37 for rs4775936 CT genotype in the female59
    IL7R rs1053496Case-controlN=112, 108 controlsTaqMan genotyping assayReduced CRC risk, OR=0.529, 0.467 and 0.644 for the CT and TT genotypes, and the T allele53
    PARP1 rs8679Case-controlN=183, 190 controlsTaqMan assayReduced CRC risk, OR=0.566 for the TC genotype and 0.695 for the C allele60
    TDG rs1866074 rs3751209Case-controlN=100, 192 controlsTaqMan genotypingReduced CRC risk, OR=0.501 for rs1866074 GG genotype; OR=0.407 for rs3751209 GA genotype in the male gender50
    TLR4 rs10759931 rs2770150Case-controlN=115, 102 controlsTaqMan allelic discrimination assayReduced CRC risk, OR=0.052, 0.018 and 0.085 for rs10759931 GA and AA genotypes, and A allele, respectively; OR=0.074, 0.194, 0.188 for rs2770150 TC and CC genotypes, and C allele only in the female gender61
    TLR9 rs187084 rs352144Case-controlN=115, 102 controlsTaqMan allelic discrimination assay (PCR)Reduced CRC risk, OR=0.527 for rs187084 T allele in the female gender; OR=0.067 for rs352144 AC genotype for rectal tumours51
    VDR1 BsmI rs1544410Case-controlN=100, 100 controlsPCR amplification, followed by Sanger sequencingOR=0.217 for rs1544410 AA genotype and 0.442 for A allele in the female gender54
    • PCR-RFLP: polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, CRC: colorectal cancer, OR: odds ratio

    • View popup
    Table 3

    - Somatic mutations in colorectal cancer from Saudi patients.

    GenesMutation rates (mutation type)Sample sizesMolecular methodologiesReferences
    KRAS56.0% (point)150PCR followed by amplicon hybridization68
    28.6% (point)755PCR and DNA sequencing69
    30.1% (point)498PCR and DNA sequencing70
    50.0% (point)194Biocartis IdyllaTm71
    45.2% (point)93NGS72
    42.2% (point)83PCR followed by amplicon hybridization73
    49.6% (point)248Biocartis IdyllaTm74
    35.0% (point)99Ion PGM sequencing75
    32.5% (point)80Sanger sequencing76
    42.85% (point)56HRM analysis, Sanger sequencing, and shifted termination assays77
    42.0% (point)300LCD-array78
    43.0% (point)51Ion AmpliSeq NGS Panel79
    25.0% (point)99Ion AmpliSeq™80
    NRAS2.2% (point)93NGS72
    2.0% (point)248Biocartis IdyllaTm74
    BRAF2.5% (point)757PCR and DNA sequencing69
    2.4% (point)498PCR and DNA sequencing70
    2.2% (point)93NGS72
    0.4% (point)248Biocartis IdyllaTm74
    PIK3CA19.0% (point)99Ion PGM Sequencing75
    12.2% (point)‎418Sanger sequencing81
    HER2 (ERBB2)0.0% (gene amplification)114FISH82
    51.0% (point)‎99Ion AmpliSeq™80
    CCND11.9% (gene amplification)114FISH82
    EGFR11.0% (point)99Ion PGM Sequencing75
    1.1% (gene amplification)114FISH82
    40.0% (point)99Ion AmpliSeq™80
    C-MYC9.0% (gene amplification)114FISH82
    MSI11.2%741Microsatellite analysis by multiplex fluorescent PCR69
    10.9%494Microsatellite analysis by multiplex fluorescent PCR70
    20.2%388Microsatellite analysis by multiplex fluorescent PCR81
    9.7%992Microsatellite analysis by multiplex fluorescent PCR83
    11.6%284Pentaplex MSI analysis system84
    11.3%‎807Microsatellite analysis by multiplex fluorescent PCR and immunohistochemistry assessment20
    TP5365.0% (point)99Ion PGM sequencing75
    33.7% (point)386Sanger sequencing81
    19.0% (point)99AmpliSeq comprehensive80
    APC36.0% (point)99Ion PGM sequencing75
    66.0% (point)99AmpliSeq comprehensive cancer panel80
    SMAD411.0% (point)99Ion PGM sequencing75
    3.0% (point)‎99AmpliSeq comprehensive cancer panel80
    13.6% (point)‎426High depth capture sequencing83
    60.8% (SMAD4 gene and 18q deletion)991FISH83
    PTEN13.0% (point)99Ion PGM sequencing75
    3.0% (point)99AmpliSeq comprehensive cancer panel80
    66.1% (point)386Sanger sequencing81
    CIMPCIMP-H=4.8%; CIMP-L=44.6%; CIMP-negative=50.6%500Real-time PCR (MethyLight)70
    • MSI: microsatellite instability, CIMP: CpG island methylator phenotype, CIMP-H: CpG island methylator phenotype-high, CIMP-L: CpG island methylator phenotype-low, PCR: polymerase chain reaction, PGM: personal genome machine, FISH: fluorescence in situ hybridisation, HRM: high resolution melt, LCD: liquid-crystal display, NGS: next-generation sequencing

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 44 (9)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 44, Issue 9
1 Sep 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Molecular pathology of colorectal cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Molecular pathology of colorectal cancer
Abdulaziz Alfahed
Saudi Medical Journal Sep 2023, 44 (9) 836-847; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.9.20230257

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Molecular pathology of colorectal cancer
Abdulaziz Alfahed
Saudi Medical Journal Sep 2023, 44 (9) 836-847; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.9.20230257
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Harnessing artificial intelligence for infection control and prevention in hospitals
  • Effects of antidiabetic drugs on the level of serum uric acid in patients who have type 2 diabetes
  • The future of personalized medicine in Saudi Arabia
Show more Review Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • colorectal cancer
  • Saudi Arabia
  • molecular pathology
  • genetic alterations

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire