Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Comparison of the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) block and the genicular nerve block in primary total knee arthroplasty

A prospective randomized trial

Abdulrahim Dündar, Deniz İpek, Mehmet Yalvaç and Şehmuz Kaya
Saudi Medical Journal March 2024, 45 (3) 279-287; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2024.45.3.20230432
Abdulrahim Dündar
From the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (Dündar, İpek) and from the Department of department of Anesthesiology (Yalvaç), Hitit University Erol Olçok Training and Research Hospital, Çorum; and from the Department of Orthopedics’ and Traumatology (Kaya), Van Yüzüncüyıl University, Van Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Abdulrahim Dündar
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Deniz İpek
From the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (Dündar, İpek) and from the Department of department of Anesthesiology (Yalvaç), Hitit University Erol Olçok Training and Research Hospital, Çorum; and from the Department of Orthopedics’ and Traumatology (Kaya), Van Yüzüncüyıl University, Van Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mehmet Yalvaç
From the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (Dündar, İpek) and from the Department of department of Anesthesiology (Yalvaç), Hitit University Erol Olçok Training and Research Hospital, Çorum; and from the Department of Orthopedics’ and Traumatology (Kaya), Van Yüzüncüyıl University, Van Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Şehmuz Kaya
From the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (Dündar, İpek) and from the Department of department of Anesthesiology (Yalvaç), Hitit University Erol Olçok Training and Research Hospital, Çorum; and from the Department of Orthopedics’ and Traumatology (Kaya), Van Yüzüncüyıl University, Van Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    - The study flow diagram highlighting the process of study.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    - Mean and 95% confidence interval plots showing the time-dependent variation of a) TUG, b) MRC, and c) Tramadol, d), repeated measures, Mean and 95% confidence interval plots showing the time-dependent variation of ROM repeated measures. IPACK: interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior, TUG: time up go test, MRC: Medical Research Council Scale for Muscle Strength, ROM: range of motion

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    - Mean and 95% confidence interval graphs showing the time-dependent variation of repeated measures of a) VAS scores at rest and b) movement.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    - Statistical results for comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics of patients among research groups.

    FactorsGroupsP-valuesPost-hoc P-values
    IPACK (n=20)Genicular (n=20)Control (n=20)
    Gender
    Male8 (40%)9 (45%)10 (50%)0.817a-
    Female12 (60%)11 (55%)10 (50%)
    ASA
    12 (10%)2 (10%)3 (15%)0.857b-
    25 (25%)8 (40%)6 (30%)
    313 (65%)10 (50%)11 (55%)
    Age65.85±6.8768.15±6.9664.35±5.430.182c-
    Body mass index30.5±2.0331.95±2.4831.45±2.80.176c-
    Surgical time (minutes)60.9±4.3459.55±4.1461±3.530.450c-
    KSS score44±3.9848.9±569.45±10.33<0.001d1-2: 0.004
    1-3: <0.001
    2-3: <0.001
    OKS score23.05±3.826.35±5.6649.15±6.06<0.001c1-2: 0.127
    1-3: <0.001
    2-3: <0.001
    WOMAC score38.4±5.9241.4±4.7469.95±7.48<0.001c1-2: 0.279
    1-3: <0.001
    2-3: <0.001

    BMI: body mass index, KSS: Knee Society Clinical Rating System, OKS: Oxford Knee Score, WOMAC: Western Ontario, McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, IPACK: interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior

    • ↵a Chi square test with n (%).

    • ↵b Fisher exact test with n (%).

    • ↵c One way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test with mean±standard deviation (SD).

    • ↵d One way ANOVA followed by Games-Howel post-hoc test with mean±SD.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    - Statistical results for the comparison of TUG, MRC, ROM, and Tramadol rescue values among research groups between groups and within groups at different time points.

    FactorsGroupsP-values (between)Post-hoc P-values
    IPACK (n=20)Genicular (n=20)Control (n=20)
    TUG
    12 hours81.10±2.8682.95±4.4698.70±5.89<0.001d1-2: 0.277
    1-3: <0.001
    2-3: <0.001
    24 hours45.8±4.2244.4±5.1153.65±3.21<0.001c1-2: 0.555
    1-3: <0.001
    2-3: <0.001
    P-values (within)<0.001f<0.001f<0.001f  
    MRC
    12 hours4.85±0.364.85±0.364.35±0.480.001e1-2: 1.000
    1-3: 0.002
    5 (4-5)5 (4-5)4 (4-5)
    2-3: 0.002
    24 hours5±05±04.9±0.310.131e-
    5 (5-5)5 (5-5)5 (4-5)
    P-values (within)0.083g0.083g0.001g  
    Tramadol rescue (mg)
    0-12 hours230±65.69175±55.01245±51.040.001e1-2: 0.028
    1-3: 1.000
    200 (100-400)200 (100-300)200 (200-300)
    2-3: 0.001
    12-24 hours165±48.93140±50.26215±48.93<0.001e1-2: 0.427
    1-3: 0.028
    200 (100-200)100 (100-200)200 (100-300)
    2-3: <0.001
    P-values (within)0.004g0.052g0.034g  
    ROM
    Pre-op111.1±5.99110.2±5.45111.2±6.630.862c-
    12 hours33.9±3.8134.45±3.8723.65±3.18<0.001c1-2: 0.882
    1-3: <0.001
    2-3: <0.001
    24 hours91.45±4.0590.35±3.4290.20±4.090.541c-
    P-values (within)<0.001h<0.001h<0.001h  
    Post-hoc P-values1-2: <0.0011-2: <0.0011-2: <0.001  
    1-3: <0.0011-3: <0.0011-3: <0.001  
    2-3: <0.0012-3: <0.0012-3: <0.001  

    TUG: time up go test, MRC: Medical Research Council Scale for Muscle Strength, ROM: range of motion, IPACK: IPACK: interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior

    • ↵c One way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test with mean±standard deviation (SD).

    • ↵d One way ANOVA followed by Games-Howel post-hoc test with mean±SD.

    • ↵e Kruskal Wallis test followed by Dunn-Bonferroni post-hoc test with median (min-max) and mean±SD.

    • ↵f Paired t-test with mean±SD.

    • ↵g Wilcoxon signed rank test with median (min-max) and mean±SD.

    • ↵h Repeated measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test with mean±SD.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    - Statistical results for the comparison of VAS scores at rest and movement between research groups between groups and within groups at different time points.

    FactorsGroupsP-values (between)Post-hoc P-values
    IPACK (n=20)Genicular (n=20)Control (n=20)
    VAS at rest
    Pre-op4.8±1.055.4±1.144.95±0.990.190c-
    12 hours5±1.074.95±0.997.1±0.91<0.001c1-2: 0.986
    1-3: <0.001
    2-3: <0.001
    24 hours5.75±0.634.15±0.585.85±0.74<0.001c1-2: <0.001
    1-3: 0.882
    2-3: <0.001
    P-values (within)0.013h0.001h<0.001h  
    Post-hocP-values1-2: 1.0001-2: 0.6751-2: <0.001  
    1-3: 0.0321-3: 0.0021-3: 0.011  
    2-3: 0.0732-3: 0.0172-3: 0.004  
    VAS at movement
    Pre-op7.05±0.886.9±1.076.8±1.10.741c-
    12 hours7.3±1.036.55±0.948.2±1.05<0.001c1-2: 0.058
    1-3: 0.018
    2-3: <0.001
    24 hours7±0.795.15±0.677.60±0.68<0.001c1-2: <0.001
    1-3: 0.028
    2-3: <0.001
    P-values (within)0.536h<0.001h<0.001h  
    Post-hoc P-values-1-2: 0.8921-2: 0.002  
    1-3: <0.0011-3: 0.058  
    2-3: <0.0012-3: 0.146  

    VAS: visual analog scale

    • ↵c One way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test with mean±standard deviation (SD).

    • ↵h Repeated measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test with mean±SD,

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 45 (3)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 45, Issue 3
1 Mar 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) block and the genicular nerve block in primary total knee arthroplasty
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) block and the genicular nerve block in primary total knee arthroplasty
Abdulrahim Dündar, Deniz İpek, Mehmet Yalvaç, Şehmuz Kaya
Saudi Medical Journal Mar 2024, 45 (3) 279-287; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.3.20230432

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) block and the genicular nerve block in primary total knee arthroplasty
Abdulrahim Dündar, Deniz İpek, Mehmet Yalvaç, Şehmuz Kaya
Saudi Medical Journal Mar 2024, 45 (3) 279-287; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.3.20230432
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hematological parameters in recent and past dengue infections in Jazan Province, Saudi Arabia
  • Longitudinal analysis of foodborne disease outbreaks in Saudi Arabia
  • Psychological stress and its association with bronchial asthma in Saudi Arabia
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • IPACK
  • GNB
  • total knee arthroplasty
  • TUG
  • pain

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire