Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1
- Sexual dysfunction rates in urinary incontinence, double incontinence and control group
Tables
- Table 1
- Comparison of the total Female Sexual Function Index score and the each domain scores among the groups.
Variables Control (n=40) Urinary Incontinence (n=40) Double incontinence (n=40) P-values Desire 3.6 3.0 3.3 0.130 Median (Q1, Q3) (3.0, 3.6) (2.4, 3.1) (2.4, 3.7) Arousal 3.6 3.3 3.3 0.116 Median (Q1, Q3) (3.2, 4.2) (2.4, 3.9) (2.1, 3.9) Lubrication 3.6 3.6 3.9 0.998 Median (Q1, Q3) (3.0, 4.2) (3.0, 4.5) (3.1, 4.5) Orgasm 4.0 4.0 3.6 0.156 Median (Q1, Q3) (3.2, 5.1) (2.8, 4.2) (2.3, 4.4) Satisfaction 3.8 3.6 3.6 0.047 Median (Q1, Q3) (3.1, 4.8) (3.5, 4.4) (2.0, 4.4) Pain 4.6 4.0 3.6 <0.001 Median (Q1, Q3) (3.9, 6.0) (3.2, 4.9) (2.4, 4.4) FSFI 22.9 20.5 20.3 0.058 Median (Q1, Q3) (20.4, 25.5) (18.2, 25.1) (15.9, 25.4) Post hoc analyses. ∞ vs. μ, p>0.05; ∞ vs. π, p=0.012; μ vs. π, p>0.05; α vs. β, p=0.007; α vs. Ω, p<0.001; β vs. Ω, p>0.05
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.