Oncological surgical outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery with loco-regional anesthesia

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Bray F,
   2. Ferlay J,
   3. Soerjomataram I,
   4. Siegel RL,
   5. Torre LA,
   6. Jemal A

   . Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394-424.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Islami F,
   2. Goding Sauer A,
   3. Miller KD,
   4. Siegel RL,
   5. Fedewa SA,
   6. Jacobs EJ, et al.

   Proportion and number of cancer cases and deaths attributable to potentially modifiable risk factors in the United States. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 31-54.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Siegel RL,
   2. Wagle NS,
   3. Cercek A,
   4. Smith RA,
   5. Jemal A

   . Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73: 233-254.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Dekker E,
   2. Tanis PJ,
   3. Vleugels JLA,
   4. Kasi PM,
   5. Wallace MB

   . Colorectal cancer. Lancet 2019; 394: 1467-1480.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Knol J,
   2. Keller DS

   . Total mesorectal excision technique-past, present, and future. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2020; 33: 134-143.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Hohenberger W,
   2. Weber K,
   3. Matzel K,
   4. Papadopoulos T,
   5. Merkel S

   . Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11: 354-364.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Di Buono G,
   2. Buscemi S,
   3. Cocorullo G,
   4. Sorce V,
   5. Amato G,
   6. Bonventre G, et al.

   Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right-sided colon cancer: short-term outcomes. A randomized clinical study. Ann Surg 2021; 274: 57-62.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Siddiqi N,
   2. Stefan S,
   3. Jootun R,
   4. Mykoniatis I,
   5. Flashman K,
   6. Beable R, et al.

   Robotic complete mesocolic excision (CME) is a safe and feasible option for right colonic cancers: short and midterm results from a single-centre experience. Surg Endosc 2021; 35: 6873-6881.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Park JH,
   2. Kim DH,
   3. Kim BR,
   4. Kim YW

   . The American Society of Anesthesiologists score influences on postoperative complications and total hospital charges after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e0653.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Tan WP,
    2. Talbott VA,
    3. Leong QQ,
    4. Isenberg GA,
    5. Goldstein SD

    . American Society of Anesthesiologists class and Charlson’s comorbidity index as predictors of postoperative colorectal anastomotic leak: a single-institution experience. J Surg Res 2013; 184: 115-119.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Daabiss M

    . American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification. Indian J Anaesth 2011; 55: 111-115.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Roy RC

    . Choosing general versus regional anesthesia for the elderly. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 2000; 18: 91-104.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Mohanty S,
    2. Rosenthal RA,
    3. Russell MM,
    4. Neuman MD,
    5. Ko CY,
    6. Esnaola NF

    . Optimal perioperative management of the geriatric patient: a best practices guideline from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 222: 930-947.

    OpenUrlPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Bowles TA,
    2. Sanders KM,
    3. Colson M,
    4. Watters DA

    . Simplified risk stratification in elective colorectal surgery. ANZ J Surg 2008; 78: 24-27.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Hackett NJ,
    2. De Oliveira GS,
    3. Jain UK,
    4. Kim JY

    . ASA class is a reliable independent predictor of medical complications and mortality following surgery. Int J Surg 2015; 18: 184-190.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Skipworth J,
    2. Srilekha A,
    3. Raptis D,
    4. O’Callaghan D,
    5. Siriwardhana S,
    6. Navaratnam R

    . Combined lumbar spinal and thoracic high-epidural regional anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia for high-risk patients undergoing gastrointestinal and colorectal surgery. World J Surg 2009; 33: 1809-1814.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Kumar CM,
    2. Corbett WA,
    3. Wilson RG

    . Spinal anaesthesia with a micro-catheter in high-risk patients undergoing colorectal cancer and other major abdominal surgery. Surg Oncol 2008; 17: 73-79.

    OpenUrlPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Wang C,
    2. Gao Z,
    3. Shen K,
    4. Shen Z,
    5. Jiang K,
    6. Liang B, et al.

    Safety, quality and effect of complete mesocolic excision vs non-complete mesocolic excision in patients with colon cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2017; 19: 962-972.

    OpenUrlPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Dimitriou N,
    2. Griniatsos J

    . Complete mesocolic excision: techniques and outcomes. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2015; 7: 383-388.

    OpenUrlPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Koh FH,
    2. Tan KK

    . Complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: is it worth it? J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 10: 1215-1221.

    OpenUrlPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Brunicardi F,
    2. Andersen D,
    3. Billiar T,
    4. Dunn D,
    5. Hunter J,
    6. Matthews J, et al.

    Schwartz’s principles of surgery. [Updated 2014; Accessed 2024 April 17]. Available from: https://accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=980&sectionid=59610088
22. 22.↵
    NCCN. Guidelines detail: rectal cancer. [Updated 2024; accessed 2023 Jul 24]. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1461
23. 23.↵
    NCCN. Guidelines detail: colon cancer. [Updated 2024; accessed 2023 Jul 24]. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1428
24. 24.↵
    1. Kao YK,
    2. Chen HP,
    3. Liu KW,
    4. Song LC,
    5. Chen YC,
    6. Lin YC, et al.

    Impact on inadequate lymph node harvest on survival in T4N0 colorectal cancer: a would-be medical center experience in Taiwan. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101: e32497.

    OpenUrlPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Baxter NN,
    2. Virnig DJ,
    3. Rothenberger DA,
    4. Morris AM,
    5. Jessurun J,
    6. Virnig BA

    . Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 219-225.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Bliggenstorfer JT,
    2. Ginesi M,
    3. Steinhagen E,
    4. Stein SL

    . Lymph node yield after rectal resection is a predictor of survival among patients with node-negative rectal adenocarcinoma. Surgery 2022; 172: 1292-1299.

    OpenUrlPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Takemasa I,
    2. Hamabe A,
    3. Ito M,
    4. Matoba S,
    5. Watanabe J,
    6. Hasegawa S, et al.

    Japanese multicenter prospective study investigating laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer with evaluation of CRM and TME quality (PRODUCT trial). Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2022; 6: 767-777.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Vignali A,
    2. Elmore U,
    3. Milone M,
    4. Rosati R

    . Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME): current status and future perspectives. Updates Surg 2019; 71: 29-37.

    OpenUrlPubMed
29. 29.
    1. Simillis C,
    2. Hompes R,
    3. Penna M,
    4. Rasheed S,
    5. Tekkis PP

    . A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis 2016; 18: 19-36.

    OpenUrlPubMed
30. 30.
    1. Liu Q,
    2. Luo D,
    3. Cai S,
    4. Li Q,
    5. Li X

    . Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: a large population-based retrospective study. Cancer Med 2018; 7: 3673-3681.

    OpenUrlPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Justiniano CF,
    2. Aquina CT,
    3. Fleming FJ,
    4. Xu Z,
    5. Boscoe FP,
    6. Schymura MJ, et al.

    Hospital and surgeon variation in positive circumferential resection margin among rectal cancer patients. Am J Surg 2019; 218: 881-886.

    OpenUrlPubMed