Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the medical and dental health status of orphan children from 4 to 12-years-old, and compare them with children living with their parents.
METHODS: This analytical, cross-sectional study took place in 3 government orphanages and 3 ordinary schools in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from July 2011 to January 2012. All orphans aged 4-12 year were selected (N=90). Ninety children living with their parents were selected randomly to serve as the controls. Demographic data, medical, and dental history were obtained through a questionnaire answered by the orphans' foster mothers and childrens' parents. The study groups were examined to evaluate their caries status using the Decayed-Missing and-Filled Teeth/Surface indices (DMFT/DMFS) for permanent teeth and (dmft/dmfs) for primary teeth. Oral hygiene status (OHI), plaque deposition (PI), and gingival health (GI) were also assessed. Pearson Chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Approximately 36% of the orphans had medical conditions compared to 14.4% of the control children. The control children visited the dentist more than the orphans (p<0.001). Approximately 96% of the orphans had dental caries compared to 90% of the control children (p<0.001). Decayed-missing and-filled teeth/surface index scores were higher among orphans (p=0.004) compared to the control children (p<0.001). Orphans scored higher in PI (p=0.009), GI (p=0.002), and OHI (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Medical health conditions were more prevalent among orphans living in government orphanages, but they were provided with good and continuous medical care. However, they had more dental caries and worse oral hygiene, as dental care was provided to them only in case of emergency.
- Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License (CC BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.