Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder

Önder Ercan, Bülent Köstü, Murat Bakacak, Yusuf Aytaç-Tohma, Bora Çoşkun, Fazıl Avcı and Erkan Efe
Saudi Medical Journal October 2015, 36 (10) 1181-1185; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.10.12016
Önder Ercan
From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ercan, Köstü, Bakacak), Urology (Efe), School of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü Imam University, Kahramanmaraş, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Aytaç-Tohma), Konya Hospital, Baskent University, Konya, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Çoşkun), Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women’s Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Avcı), Patnos State Hospital, Ağrı, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bülent Köstü
From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ercan, Köstü, Bakacak), Urology (Efe), School of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü Imam University, Kahramanmaraş, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Aytaç-Tohma), Konya Hospital, Baskent University, Konya, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Çoşkun), Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women’s Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Avcı), Patnos State Hospital, Ağrı, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Murat Bakacak
From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ercan, Köstü, Bakacak), Urology (Efe), School of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü Imam University, Kahramanmaraş, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Aytaç-Tohma), Konya Hospital, Baskent University, Konya, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Çoşkun), Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women’s Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Avcı), Patnos State Hospital, Ağrı, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yusuf Aytaç-Tohma
From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ercan, Köstü, Bakacak), Urology (Efe), School of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü Imam University, Kahramanmaraş, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Aytaç-Tohma), Konya Hospital, Baskent University, Konya, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Çoşkun), Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women’s Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Avcı), Patnos State Hospital, Ağrı, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Bora Çoşkun
From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ercan, Köstü, Bakacak), Urology (Efe), School of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü Imam University, Kahramanmaraş, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Aytaç-Tohma), Konya Hospital, Baskent University, Konya, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Çoşkun), Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women’s Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Avcı), Patnos State Hospital, Ağrı, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fazıl Avcı
From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ercan, Köstü, Bakacak), Urology (Efe), School of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü Imam University, Kahramanmaraş, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Aytaç-Tohma), Konya Hospital, Baskent University, Konya, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Çoşkun), Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women’s Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Avcı), Patnos State Hospital, Ağrı, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erkan Efe
From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ercan, Köstü, Bakacak), Urology (Efe), School of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü Imam University, Kahramanmaraş, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Aytaç-Tohma), Konya Hospital, Baskent University, Konya, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Çoşkun), Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women’s Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Avcı), Patnos State Hospital, Ağrı, Turkey
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the use of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder (OAB).

Methods: This prospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with OAB who presenting to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, School of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey between October 2013 and August 2014. Patients were randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=60) received 5 mg solifenacin per day, while Group 2 (n=59) received 4 mg fesoterodine per day. All the patients’ OAB symptom scores (OABSS) in weeks 0, 4, and 12 were recorded. In addition, treatment costs and side effects of the drugs were evaluated.

Results: Average OABSS (score 1) was determined as: 9.5 ± 2.8 for Group 1 and 10.7 ± 1.8 for Group 2 at week 0; 2.2 ± 1.2 (Group 1) and 2.4 ± 1.3 (Group 2) at week 4 (score 2); and 1.3 ± 0.5 for Group 1 and 1.3 ± 0.6 for Group 2 at week 12 (score 3). In addition, no statistically significant difference was found between the scores (p=0.062 (score 1), p=0.464 (score 2), and p=0.527 (score 3). The discontinuation rate of medication due to its side effects was 0 (0%) for Group 1, and 6 (10.2%) for Group 2. Intragroup changes in the scores 1-2, 1-3, and 2-3 values was statistically significant in both groups (p<0.001).

Conclusion: No significant difference was found between the OABSS of these 2 drugs. However, discontinuation of drugs due to side effects was more frequent in fesoterodine.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure. Authors have no conflict of interests, and the work was not supported or funded by any drug company.

  • Received April 12, 2015.
  • Accepted September 6, 2015.
  • Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 36 (10)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 36, Issue 10
1 Oct 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder
Önder Ercan, Bülent Köstü, Murat Bakacak, Yusuf Aytaç-Tohma, Bora Çoşkun, Fazıl Avcı, Erkan Efe
Saudi Medical Journal Oct 2015, 36 (10) 1181-1185; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2015.10.12016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder
Önder Ercan, Bülent Köstü, Murat Bakacak, Yusuf Aytaç-Tohma, Bora Çoşkun, Fazıl Avcı, Erkan Efe
Saudi Medical Journal Oct 2015, 36 (10) 1181-1185; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2015.10.12016
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Longitudinal analysis of foodborne disease outbreaks in Saudi Arabia
  • Psychological stress and its association with bronchial asthma in Saudi Arabia
  • The factors affecting comfort and the comfort levels of patients hospitalized in the coronary intensive care unit
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire