Evaluation of mini-implant sites in the posterior maxilla using traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography

References

1. ↵
   1. Chang HP,
   2. Tseng YC

   (2014) Miniscrew implant applications in contemporary orthodontics. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 30:111–115.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
2. 1. Jasoria G,
   2. Shamim W,
   3. Rathore S,
   4. Kalra A,
   5. Manchanda M,
   6. Jaggi N

   (2013) Miniscrew implants as temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a comprehensive review. J Contemp Dent Pract 14:993–999.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
3. 1. Costello BJ,
   2. Ruiz RL,
   3. Petrone J,
   4. Sohn J

   (2010) Temporary skeletal anchorage devices for orthodontics. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 22:91–105.

   OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
4. 1. Papadopoulos MA,
   2. Tarawneh F

   (2007) The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: a comprehensive review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103:e6–e15.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
5. ↵
   1. Al-Fraidi AA,
   2. Zawawi KH

   (2010) Clinical showcase. Selective intrusion of overerupted upper first molars using a temporary anchorage device: case report. J Can Dent Assoc 76:a9.

   OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
6. ↵
   1. Aljhani A,
   2. Zawawi KH

   (2010) The use of mini-implants in en masse retraction for the treatment of bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Saudi Dent J 22:35–39.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
7. 1. Kuroda S,
   2. Katayama A,
   3. Takano-Yamamoto T

   (2004) Severe anterior open-bite case treated using titanium screw anchorage. Angle Orthod 74:558–567.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
8. ↵
   1. Kuroda S,
   2. Sugawara Y,
   3. Yamashita K,
   4. Mano T,
   5. Takano-Yamamoto T

   (2005) Skeletal Class III oligodontia patient treated with titanium screw anchorage and orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127:730–738.

   OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
9. ↵
   1. AlSamak S,
   2. Gkantidis N,
   3. Bitsanis E,
   4. Christou P

   (2012) Assessment of potential orthodontic mini-implant insertion sites based on anatomical hard tissue parameters: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:875–887.

   OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
10. 1. Cha JY,
    2. Kil JK,
    3. Yoon TM,
    4. Hwang CJ

    (2010) Miniscrew stability evaluated with computerized tomography scanning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:73–79.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
11. 1. Chen Y,
    2. Kyung HM,
    3. Zhao WT,
    4. Yu WJ

    (2009) Critical factors for the success of orthodontic mini-implants: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135:284–291.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
12. 1. Fayed MM,
    2. Pazera P,
    3. Katsaros C

    (2010) Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 80:939–951.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
13. ↵
    1. Kuroda S,
    2. Yamada K,
    3. Deguchi T,
    4. Hashimoto T,
    5. Kyung HM,
    6. Takano-Yamamoto T

    (2007) Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131(4 Suppl):S68–S73.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
14. 1. Martinelli FL,
    2. Luiz RR,
    3. Faria M,
    4. Nojima LI

    (2010) Anatomic variability in alveolar sites for skeletal anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138:252.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
15. ↵
    1. Wawrzinek C,
    2. Sommer T,
    3. Fischer-Brandies H

    (2008) Microdamage in cortical bone due to the overtightening of orthodontic microscrews. J Orofac Orthop 69:121–134.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
16. ↵
    1. Kim SH,
    2. Kang SM,
    3. Choi YS,
    4. Kook YA,
    5. Chung KR,
    6. Huang JC

    (2010) Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of mini-implants after placement: Is root proximity a major risk factor for failure? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138:264–276.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
17. ↵
    1. Min KI,
    2. Kim SC,
    3. Kang KH,
    4. Cho JH,
    5. Lee EH,
    6. Chang NY,
    7. et al.

    (2012) Root proximity and cortical bone thickness effects on the success rate of orthodontic micro-implants using cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 82:1014–1021.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
18. ↵
    1. Kim YK,
    2. Park JY,
    3. Kim SG,
    4. Kim JS,
    5. Kim JD

    (2011) Magnification rate of digital panoramic radiographs and its effectiveness for pre-operative assessment of dental implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40:76–83.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
19. ↵
    1. Schropp L,
    2. Stavropoulos A,
    3. Gotfredsen E,
    4. Wenzel A

    (2009) Calibration of radiographs by a reference metal ball affects preoperative selection of implant size. Clin Oral Investig 13:375–381.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
20. ↵
    1. Palomo JM,
    2. Kau CH,
    3. Palomo LB,
    4. Hans MG

    (2006) Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in dentistry. Dent Today 25:130, 132-135.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
21. ↵
    1. Hajeer MY,
    2. Millett DT,
    3. Ayoub AF,
    4. Siebert JP

    (2004) Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: part I. J Orthod 31:62–70.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
22. ↵
    1. Kau CH,
    2. Richmond S,
    3. Palomo JM,
    4. Hans MG

    (2005) Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics. J Orthod 32:282–293.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
23. ↵
    1. Miyawaki S,
    2. Koyama I,
    3. Inoue M,
    4. Mishima K,
    5. Sugahara T,
    6. Takano-Yamamoto T

    (2003) Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:373–378.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
24. ↵
    1. Garib DG,
    2. Calil LR,
    3. Leal CR,
    4. Janson G

    (2014) Is there a consensus for CBCT use in Orthodontics? Dental Press J Orthod 19:136–149.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
25. ↵
    1. Zawawi KH

    (2014) Acceptance of orthodontic miniscrews as temporary anchorage devices. Patient Prefer Adherence 8:933–937.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
26. ↵
    1. Kyung HM,
    2. Park HS,
    3. Bae SM,
    4. Sung JH,
    5. Kim IB

    (2003) Development of orthodontic micro-implants for intraoral anchorage. J Clin Orthod 37:321–328.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
27. ↵
    1. Dalessandri D,
    2. Salgarello S,
    3. Dalessandri M,
    4. Lazzaroni E,
    5. Piancino M,
    6. Paganelli C,
    7. et al.

    (2014) Determinants for success rates of temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a meta-analysis (n >50). Eur J Orthod 36:303–313.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
28. ↵
    1. Maino BG,
    2. Weiland F,
    3. Attanasi A,
    4. Zachrisson BU,
    5. Buyukyilmaz T

    (2007) Root damage and repair after contact with miniscrews. J Clin Orthod 41:762–766.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
29. ↵
    1. Maino BG,
    2. Gianelly AA,
    3. Bednar J,
    4. Mura P,
    5. Maino G

    (2007) MGBM system: new protocol for Class II non extraction treatment without cooperation. Prog Orthod 8:130–143.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
30. ↵
    1. McGuire MK,
    2. Scheyer ET,
    3. Gallerano RL

    (2006) Temporary anchorage devices for tooth movement: a review and case reports. J Periodontol 77:1613–1624.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
31. ↵
    1. Kim SH,
    2. Yoon HG,
    3. Choi YS,
    4. Hwang EH,
    5. Kook YA,
    6. Nelson G

    (2009) Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135:635–641.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
32. ↵
    1. Kim SH,
    2. Choi YS,
    3. Hwang EH,
    4. Chung KR,
    5. Kook YA,
    6. Nelson G

    (2007) Surgical positioning of orthodontic mini-implants with guides fabricated on models replicated with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131(4 Suppl):S82–S89.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
33. ↵
    1. Lim WH,
    2. Lee SK,
    3. Wikesjo UM,
    4. Chun YS

    (2007) A descriptive tissue evaluation at maxillary interradicular sites: implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement. Clin Anat 20:760–765.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
34. ↵
    1. Lim JE,
    2. Lim WH,
    3. Chun YS

    (2008) Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement. Clin Anat 21:486–491.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
35. ↵
    1. Watanabe H,
    2. Deguchi T,
    3. Hasegawa M,
    4. Ito M,
    5. Kim S,
    6. Takano-Yamamoto T

    (2013) Orthodontic miniscrew failure rate and root proximity, insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density. Orthod Craniofac Res 16:44–55.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
36. ↵
    1. Bennemann R,
    2. Baxmann M,
    3. Keilig L,
    4. Reimann S,
    5. Braumann B,
    6. Bourauel C

    (2012) Evaluating miniscrew position using orthopantomograms compared to cone-beam computed tomography. J Orofac Orthop 73:236–248.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar