Abstract
Objectives: To assess the incidence and awareness of taekwondo athletes in Saudi Arabia regarding oral and maxillofacial (OMF) injuries and their prevention.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, an online questionnaire about the incidence and awareness of OMF injuries and their prevention was developed and distributed to taekwondo athletes in Saudi Arabia via their coaches.
Results: Sixty-eight responses were collected. The mean age of the participants was 29.3±9.1 years and 97% of them were males. Most of the participants (83%) believed that they are vulnerable to OMF injuries during practice. Approximately 23% of the participants reported a previous injury of the OMF area, while approximately 56% reported injuries in other areas. Most dental injuries (94%) were tooth fracture or displacement, while 6% were tooth avulsion. Eight participants (12%) were aware of the possibility of returning an avulsed tooth to its socket. More than 50% of those participants had inadequate knowledge on the appropriate storage media for the avulsed tooth or the maximum time allowed to return it to its socket. Eighty-one percent of the participants knew about the mouthguard, while 56% reported that they are actually using one. The most frequently reported barriers for not using a mouthguard during practice were difficulty in practicing with it, not being convinced of its importance, and lack of information where to get one.
Conclusions: Most of the participants are aware of OMF injuries; however, their knowledge and behavior towards preventing and managing them are inadequate.
Taekwondo is an international martial arts sport with a heavy emphasis on head-height, fast, jumping, and spinning kicks. Taekwondo athletes are 3 times more at risk of orofacial injuries than non-contact sports practitioners,1 with an incidence of orofacial injuries ranging between 20-34%.2,3 In 2001, the World Taekwondo Federation (WTF) introduced a new scoring system that awards more points for kicks to the head.1 This scoring system led to an increase in orofacial injuries.4 Orofacial injuries include soft tissue laceration, bone fractures, and teeth fractures.5 Prevention is the best approach to such injuries since treatment can be complicated and expensive. According to the American Dental Association, a properly fitted mouthguard is the best protective device for reducing the incidence and severity of sports-related dental injuries.6,7 A custom mouthguard made for an athlete by a dentist offers the best protection from dental injuries; however, it can be costly. Other types of mouthguard found in sports stores for low prices, including boil-and-bite and stock mouthguards, are not recommended since they offer less protection and comfort and might dislodge during use and obstruct the airway.8
A study by Vidovic et al9 evaluated the incidence of dental and facial injuries, the habits and awareness regarding wearing a mouthguard, and awareness regarding prevention and management of tooth avulsion. In a survey conducted on 484 taekwondo athletes during national championships or tournaments, 96% of the participants wore mouthguards but only 5% used custom-made ones and among all participants, 62% had sustained a serious injury. A study by Lee et al1 assessed the level of mouthguard use, attitude, awareness, and wearability issues among elite Korean taekwondo athletes. Although the provision of information on mouthguard was found to be inadequate, the majority of respondents consider mouthguard an effective prevention device against injuries. Another study was conducted by Kececi et al10 on 162 athletes; of those athletes, 52 were taekwondo athletes. They found that 24% of the taekwondo athletes suffered at least one type of dental injury and only 10% wore a mouthguard.
The aim of this study to was investigate the incidence of dental and facial injuries amongst taekwondo athletes in Saudi Arabia and their awareness regarding their prevention and management.
Methods
A questionnaire was developed, based on previous studies9,11-13 in December 2015, to survey taekwondo players about the incidence and awareness in regards to oral and maxillofacial (OMF) injuries and their prevention and management. The questionnaire was in Arabic and consisted of 4 sections. The first section contained 5 questions and queried the participants about their demographic information. The second section contained 4 questions and queried the participants about their knowledge and experience with injuries including OMF injuries. The third section contained 5 questions and queried the participants about their knowledge and experience with the management of OMF injuries. The fourth section contained five questions and queried the participants about their knowledge, behavior, and attitude in regards to mouthguards.
An ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Committee at King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Dentistry (KAUFD) and all procedures performed were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The targeted population was semi-professional and amateur taekwondo athletes in the 5 most populated regions of Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire and consent were made using Google Docs (Google Inc., Googleplex, Mountain View, California, USA) and distributed to the coaches in the Saudi Taekwondo Coaches Network using the instant messaging software WhatsApp (WhatsApp Inc., Mountain View, California, USA). All participants consented electronically before filling the online questionnaire.
Statistical analysis. Data was collected, tabulated, and statistically analyzed to estimate descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, means, and accompanying standard deviations or 95% confidence intervals where appropriate). All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
The questionnaire was distributed to 396 athletes. Sixty-eight responses were collected (response rate: 17%). The mean age of the participants was 29.3±9.1 years and about 97% of them were male. Most of the participants believed that they are vulnerable to oral and maxillofacial (OMF) injuries during practice and recognized the importance of early intervention after injury, 83% and 90%, respectively (Table 1). Approximately 23% of the participants reported a previous injury of OMF area (more than half of them did not seek any treatment after injury), while about 56% reported injuries in other areas (Table 2). The majority of the dental injuries (94%) were tooth fracture or displacement, while only 6% were tooth avulsion (Table 3). Only 8 participants (12%) were aware of the possibility of returning an avulsed tooth to its socket (Table 4). More than half of those participants had inadequate knowledge about the appropriate storage media for the avulsed tooth or the maximum time allowed to return the avulsed tooth to its socket (Table 5). Majority of the participants (81%) knew about the mouthguard, while only 56% reported that they use one. The most frequently reported barriers to using a mouthguard during practice were difficulty in practicing with it, not being convinced of its importance and lack of knowledge of where to get one (Table 6).
Responses as to the possibility of oral and maxillofacial injury and the importance of early intervention.
Responses as to previous oral and maxillofacial trauma and if they seek treatment after trauma
Responses as to the type of dental injury.
Responses as to the possibility of returning an avulsed tooth to its socket.
Responses as to the appropriate storage media for the avulsed tooth/the maximum time allowed to return the avulsed tooth its socket.
Responses on the barriers for using a mouthguard during practice.
Discussion
The use of mouthguard has been mandatory in local and international taekwondo tournaments; however, there have not been any studies in regard to mouthguard use amongst taekwondo athletes in Saudi Arabia.1
In this study, the majority of the participants believed that they are vulnerable to OMF injuries and knew about mouthguards 83% and 81%, respectively; however, only 56% reported wearing one which is comparable to the findings of Lee et al. in a study of elite Korean taekwondo athletes in 2013 in which 56% reported not having experience with mouthguards.1
One of the most frequently reported barriers to wearing a mouthguard is difficulty during practice while wearing one (29%); this was also reported in other studies.1,9,11,14-18 This can be attributed to the type of mouthguard used as none of the participants in this study wore custom-made mouthguards. According to previous studies,7,10,12,14,18,19 the use of non-custom-made mouthguards (stock or boil-and-bite), unlike custom-made ones, causes breathing problems. Although non-custom-made mouthguards are cheaper and easier to acquire, they might also cause difficulty in talking,9 jaw muscle fatigue, dislodge during use and obstruct the airway.1,8,9 For that, many studies recommended the usage of a custom-made mouthguard.20-23 Another reported barrier to wearing mouthguards is not being convinced of its importance (39%), which is consistent with similar studies.12,13 Interestingly, in a study by Spinas and Savasta,24 only 1% of the participants wore a mouthguard, and after having suffered a dental injury all of them started wearing one. Awareness about mouthguard is significantly influenced by the coaches; as a matter of fact, 81% of the participants knew about the mouthguard and 56% of those knew about it from their coaches.9,25 Dental professionals have an important role in promoting wearing custom-made mouthguards since many of the participants reported a lack of information on how to get a mouthguard as a barrier to wearing one (32%).11-13,18 Also, none of the participants in this study wore a custom-made mouthguard and those who wore non-custom-made mouthguards complained of difficulties in wearing them.
Most participants (90%) recognized the importance of early intervention after injury. About 23% of the participants in this study experienced OMF injuries, which is similar to previous studies,9,11,18,26 half of which did not seek any treatment after the injury, a finding which was also reported by approximately fifth (23%) of the participants in a study by Rouhani et al18 on Iranian contact sports athletes. Most OMF injuries (94%) were tooth fracture or displacement, similar to previous studies,10,26 and 6% were tooth avulsion. Most of these injuries can be easily avoided and treated and for that an emphasis on having an interaction between the dental community and the sports community is vital as it will improve the athletes’ compliance and knowledge.
Many previous studies9,13,15,27 reported low knowledge in regards to the possibility of returning an avulsed tooth to its socket and how to store an avulsed tooth. In a study by Vidovic et al9 on Croatian taekwondo athletes, 44% of athletes knew about the possibility of returning an avulsed tooth while, surprisingly, in our study only 12% were aware of the possibility of returning an avulsed tooth to its socket and only 25% had adequate knowledge about the appropriate storage media for the avulsed tooth or the maximum time allowed to return the avulsed tooth its socket. This is an alarming finding that, again, urges the dental community to have a continuous interaction with the sports community.
The response rate in this study was low, which can be attributed to the lack of individual follow-up due to the fact that participants were not approached individually but through their coaches. This low response rate will not likely affect the study recommendation for a better role for the dental community in educating the sports community about OMF injuries, and their management and prevention.
In conclusion, the results of our study show that the incidence of OMF injuries in taekwondo athletes practicing in Saudi Arabia is similar to that in other countries. The awareness about such injuries was high; however, knowledge and proper behavior in regards to their prevention and management are alarmingly inadequate since the majority lacked information on managing such injuries and almost half the injured did not seek treatment after the injury. As for prevention, none of the participants wore a custom-made mouthguard; many reported not being convinced of its importance, and many lacked the information of where to get one.
Footnotes
Disclosure. Authors have no conflict of interests, and the work was not supported or funded by any drug company.
- Received July 10, 2017.
- Accepted August 9, 2017.
- Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.