The effect of varying cone beam computed tomography image resolution and field-of-view centralization on effective radiation dose

References

1. ↵
   1. Jadu F,
   2. Yaffe MJ,
   3. Lam EWN

   (2010) A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 39:257–263.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. ↵
   1. Neta G,
   2. Rajaraman P,
   3. Berrington De Gonzalez A,
   4. Doody MM,
   5. Alexander BH,
   6. Preston D,
   7. et al.

   (2013) A prospective study of medical diagnostic radiography and risk of thyroid cancer. Am J Epidemiol 177:800–809.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. ↵
   1. Ludlow JB,
   2. Davies-Ludlow LE,
   3. White SC

   (2008) Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc 139:1237–1243.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. ↵
   1. Gilbert ES

   (2010) Ionizing Radiation and Cancer Risks : What have we learned. Int J Radiat Biol 85:467–482.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Jaeobi W

   (1975) The concept of the effective dose. A proposal for the combination of organ doses. Biophys 12:1–109.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Streffer C,
   2. Jacob P

   (2015) Wolfgang Jacobi (17 May 1928-3 March 2015). J Radiol Prot 35:735–736.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. International Commission on Radiological Protection

   (1977) Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 26. Ann ICRP 1:2–3.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Ludlow JB,
   2. Ivanovic M

   (2008) Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106:930–938.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Hendee WR,
   2. Ritenour ER,
   3. Hoffmann KR

   , eds (2003) Medical Imaging Physics (Wiley & Sons Inc, New York), 4th ed, p 730.
10. ↵
    1. Ludlow JB,
    2. Timothy R,
    3. Walker C,
    4. Hunter R,
    5. Benavides E,
    6. Samuelson DB,
    7. et al.

    (2015) Effective dose of dental CBCT - A meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 44:20140197.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. ↵
    1. Radiology Support Devices

    Manual The Aldeson Radiation Theraphy Phantom, Available from: http://www.rsdphantoms.com/pdf/aldersonradiationtherapy.pdf. [Accessed 2018 April 9].
12. ↵
    1. Program AM

    Annual Meeting Program NCRP: Achievements of the Past 50 Years and Addressing the Needs of the Future NCRP Mission: To support radiation protection by 2014, Available from: http://ncrponline.org/wp-content/themes/ncrp/PDFs/PROGRAM_2-10.pdf. [Accessed 2018 April 9].
13. ↵
    1. Roberts JA,
    2. Drage NA,
    3. Davies J,
    4. Thomas DW

    (2009) Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol 82:35–40.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. ↵
    1. Spin-Neto R,
    2. Gotfredsen E,
    3. Wenzel A

    (2013) Impact of voxel size variation on CBCT-based diagnostic outcome in dentistry: A systematic review. J Digit Imaging 26:813–820.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Sherrard JF,
    2. Rossouw PE,
    3. Benson BW,
    4. Carrillo R,
    5. Buschang PH

    (2010) Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137(4 Suppl):S100–S108.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Nikneshan S,
    2. Valizadeh S,
    3. Javanmard A,
    4. Alibakhshi L

    (2016) Effect of Voxel size on detection of external root resorption defects using cone beam computed tomography. Iran J Radiol 13:e34985.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Melo SLS,
    2. Bortoluzzi EA,
    3. Abreu M,
    4. Corrêa LR,
    5. Corrêa M

    (2010) Diagnostic ability of a cone-beam computed tomography scan to assess longitudinal root fractures in prosthetically treated teeth. J Endod 36:1879–1882.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
18. ↵
    1. Wenzel A,
    2. Haiter-neto F

    (2009) Variable-resolution cone-beam computerized tomography with enhancement filtration compared with intraoral photostimulable phosphor radiography in detection of transverse root fractures in an in vitro model. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108:939–945.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
19. ↵
    1. Kamburolu K,
    2. Murat S,
    3. Yüksel SP,
    4. Cebeci ARI,
    5. Paksoy CS

    (2010) Occlusal caries detection by using a cone-beam CT with different voxel resolutions and a digital intraoral sensor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:e63–e69.

    OpenUrlPubMed
20. ↵
    1. Safi Y,
    2. Ghaedsharaf S,
    3. Aziz A,
    4. Hosseinpour S,
    5. Mortazavi H

    (2017) Effect of field of view on detection of external root resorption in cone-beam computed tomography. Iran Endod J 12:179–184.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Loubele M,
    2. Bogaerts R,
    3. Van Dijck E,
    4. Pauwels R,
    5. Vanheusden S,
    6. Suetens P,
    7. et al.

    (2009) Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 71:461–468.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. ↵
    1. Hedeşiu M,
    2. Báciuţ M,
    3. Báciuţ G,
    4. Nackaerts O,
    5. Jacobs R

    (2012) Comparison of cone beam CT device and field of view for the detection of simulated periapical bone lesions. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 41:548–552.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. ↵
    1. Jaju PP,
    2. Jaju SP

    (2015) Cone-beam computed tomography: Time to move from ALARA to ALADA. Imaging Sci Dent 45:263–265.

    OpenUrl