Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Auditory temporal resolution in adaptive tasks

Gap detection investigation

Abdulsalam A. Alhaidary, Kishore Tanniru, Adel F. Aljadaan and Lamya M. Alabdulkarim
Saudi Medical Journal January 2019, 40 (1) 52-58; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2019.1.23814

References

  1. ↵
    (1996) American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Central auditory processing:current status of research and implications for clinical practice. American Journal Audiology 5:41–52.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Reed CM,
    2. Braida LD,
    3. Zurek PM
    (2009) Review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment:a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits. Trends Amplif 13:4–43.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Lister J,
    2. Roberts R,
    3. Shackelford J,
    4. Rogers C
    (2006) An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution. Am J Audiol 15:133–140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Musiek FE,
    2. Shinn JB,
    3. Jirsa R,
    4. Bamiou DE,
    5. Baran JA,
    6. Zaida E
    (2005) GIN (gaps-in-noise) test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear Hear 26:608–618.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Keith R
    (2000) Random gap detection test (Auditec, St Louis (MO)).
  6. ↵
    1. Kwon BJ
    (2012) AUX:a scripting language for auditory signal processing and software packages for psychoacoustic experiments and education. Behavior Ressearch Methods 44:361–373.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Hoover E,
    2. Pasquesi L,
    3. Souza P
    (2015) Comparison of clinical and traditional gap detection tests. J Am Acad Audiol 26:540–546.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Wong AC,
    2. McPherson B
    (2015) Adaptive tests of temporal resolution:comparison with the gaps-in-noise test in normal-hearing young adults. Int J Audiol 54:29–36.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Phillips DP,
    2. Hall SE,
    3. Harrington IA,
    4. Taylor TL
    (1998) “Central”auditory gap detection:a spatial case. J Acoust Soc Am 103:2064–2068.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Lister J,
    2. Roberts R,
    3. Krause JC,
    4. DeBiase D,
    5. Carlson H
    (2011) An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution:within-channel and across-channel gap detection. Int J Audiol 50:375–384.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Hess BA,
    2. Blumsack JT,
    3. Ross ME,
    4. Brock RE
    (2012) Performance at different stimulus intensities with the within- and across-channel adaptive tests of temporal resolution. Int J Audiol 51:900–905.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Florentine M,
    2. Buus S,
    3. Geng W
    (1999) Psychometric functions for gap detection in a yes-no procedure. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106:3512–3520.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Grose JH,
    2. Hall JW 3rd.,
    3. Buss E,
    4. Hatch D
    (2001) Gap detection for similar and dissimilar gap markers. J Acoust Soc Am 109:1587–1595.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Lister J,
    2. Besing J,
    3. Koehnke J
    (2002) Effects of age and frequency disparity on gap discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 111:2793–2800.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Mishra SK,
    2. Panda MR,
    3. Herbert C
    (2014) Enhanced auditory temporal gap detection in listeners with musical training. J Acoust Soc Am 136:EL173–EL178.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Mishra SK,
    2. Panda MR
    (2016) Rapid auditory learning of temporal gap detection. J Acoust Soc Am 140:EL50.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Mishra SK,
    2. Dey R,
    3. Davessar JL
    (2015) Temporal resolution of the normal ear in listeners with unilateral hearing impairment. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 16:773–782.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Boersma P,
    2. Weenink D
    Praat:doing phonetics by computer. 6.0.14, Available from: http://www.praat.org/. [Updated 2018 March 14].
  19. ↵
    1. Lister J,
    2. Tarver K
    (2004) Effect of age on silent gap discrimination in synthetic speech stimuli. J Speech Lang Hear Res 47:257–268.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Dai H,
    2. Micheyl C
    (2012) Separating the contributions of primary and unwanted cues in psychophysical studies. Psychol Rev 119:770–788.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Lister J,
    2. Koehnke JD,
    3. Besing JM
    (2000) Binaural gap duration discrimination in listeners with impaired hearing and normal hearing. Ear Hear 21:141–150.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Brown LG
    (1996) Additional rules for the transformed up-down method in psychophysics. Percept Psychophys 58:959–962.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Lister J,
    2. Roberts R,
    3. Lister FL
    (2011) An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution:age effects. Int J Audiol 50:367–374.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Buss E,
    2. Hall JW III.,
    3. Porter H,
    4. Grose JH
    (2014) Gap detection in school-age children and adults:effects of inherent envelope modulation and the availability of cues across frequency. J Speech Lang Hear Res 57:1098–1107.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Hall JW,
    2. Buss E,
    3. Ozmeral EJ,
    4. Grose JH
    (2016) The effect of noise fluctuation and spectral bandwidth on gap detection. J Acoust Soc Am 139:1601–1610.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Shinn JB,
    2. Chermak GD,
    3. Musiek FE
    (2009) GIN (gaps-in-noise) performance in the pediatric population. J Am Acad Audiol 20:229–238.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Samelli AG,
    2. Schochat E
    (2008) The gaps-in-noise test:Gap detection thresholds in normal-hearing young adults. Int J Audiol 47:238–245.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Formby C,
    2. Barker C,
    3. Abbey H,
    4. Raney JJ
    (1993) Detection of silent temporal gaps between narrow-band noise makers having second-formant like properties of voiceless stop/vowel combinations. J Acoust Soc Am 93:1023–1027.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Phillips DP,
    2. Smith JC
    (2004) Correlations among within-channel and between-channel auditory gap-detection thresholds in normal listeners. Perception 33:371–378.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Elangovan S,
    2. Stuart A
    (2008) Natural boundaries in gap detection are related to categorical perception of stop consonants. Ear Hear 29:761–774.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Phillips DP
    (1999) Auditory gap detection, perceptual channels, and temporal resolution in speech perception. J Am Acad Audiol 10:343–354.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Citation Tools
Bookmark this article

Jump to section