Effect of immediate versus delayed loadings of dental implants on the oral health-related quality of life in Saudi population

References

1. ↵
   1. Allen PF

   (2003) Assessment of oral health related quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:40.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. 1. Heo Y,
   2. Heo S,
   3. Chang M,
   4. Park J

   (2008) The patients'satisfaction following implant treatment. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 46:569–576.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Schropp L,
   2. Isidor F,
   3. Kostopoulos L,
   4. Wenzel A

   (2004) Patient experience of, and satisfaction with, delayed-immediate vs. delayed single-tooth implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 15:498–503.

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. ↵
   1. Sonoyama W,
   2. Kuboki T,
   3. Okamoto S,
   4. Suzuki H,
   5. Arakawa H,
   6. Kanyama M,
   7. et al.

   (2002) Quality of life assessment in patients with implant-supported and resin-bonded fixed prosthesis for bounded edentulous spaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 13:359–364.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. ↵
   1. Singh M,
   2. Kumar L,
   3. Anwar M,
   4. Chand P

   (2015) Immediate dental implant placement with immediate loading following extraction of natural teeth. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 6:252–255.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Cosola S,
   2. Marconcini S,
   3. Giammarinaro E,
   4. Poli GL,
   5. Covani U,
   6. Barone A

   (2018) Oral health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes of immediately or delayed loaded implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws:a retrospective comparative study. Minerva Stomatol 67:189–195.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Peñarrocha-Oltra D,
   2. Covani U,
   3. Peñarrocha-Diago M,
   4. Peñarrocha-Diago M

   (2014) Immediate loading with fixed full-arch prostheses in the maxilla:review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 19:e512–e517.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Romanos G,
   2. Froum S,
   3. Hery C,
   4. Cho SC,
   5. Tarnow D

   (2010) Survival rate of immediately vs delayed loaded implants:analysis of the current literature. J Oral Implantol 36:315–324.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. ↵
   1. Fareed WM

   (2015) Immediate versus delayed dental implants. Br Biotechnol J 11:1–7.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Herkrath FJ,
    2. Vettore MV,
    3. Werneck GL

    (2018) Contextual and individual factors associated with dental services utilisation by Brazilian adults:A multilevel analysis. PLoS One 13:e0192771.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Kaur P,
    2. Singh S,
    3. Mathur A,
    4. Makkar DK,
    5. Aggarwal VP,
    6. Batra M,
    7. et al.

    (2017) Impact of Dental Disorders and its Influence on Self Esteem Levels among Adolescents. J Clin Diagn Res 11:ZC05–ZC08.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Mary AV,
    2. Mahendra J,
    3. John J,
    4. Moses J,
    5. Ebenezar AVR,
    6. Kesavan R

    (2017) Assessing Quality of Life using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) in Subjects with and without Orthodontic Treatment need in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. J Clin Diagn Res 11:ZC78–ZC81.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Butterworth CJ,
    2. Baxter AM,
    3. Shaw MJ,
    4. Bradnock G

    (2001) The provision of dental implants in the National Health Service Hospital dental services--a national questionnaire. Br Dent J 190:93–96.

    OpenUrlPubMed
14. 1. Conte GJ,
    2. Rhodes P,
    3. Richards D,
    4. Kao RT

    (2002) Considerations for anterior implant esthetics. J Calif Dent Assoc 30:528–534.

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. ↵
    1. Marius HS

    (2010) The timing of dental implant loading. A literature review. Research_Dental Implant Loading 3:06–16.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Abu Hantash RO,
    2. Al-Omiri MK,
    3. Al-Wahadni AM

    (2006) Psychological impact on implant patients'oral health-related quality of life. Clin Oral Implants Res 17:116–123.

    OpenUrlPubMed
17. 1. August M,
    2. Chung K,
    3. Chang Y,
    4. Glowacki J

    (2001) Influence of estrogen status on endosseous implant osseointegration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:1285–1289, discussion 1290-1.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
18. ↵
    1. Awad MA,
    2. Locker D,
    3. Korner-Bitensky N,
    4. Feine JS

    (2000) Implants provide better health-related quality of life than conventional treatment for edentulous patients. J Den Res 79:1659–1663.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Doyle SL,
    2. Hodges JS,
    3. Pesun IJ,
    4. Law AS,
    5. Bowles WR

    (2007) Prospective cross-sectional comparison of initial nonsurgical endodontic treatment and single-tooth implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent 28:296–301.

    OpenUrlPubMed
20. 1. Iqbal MK,
    2. Kim S

    (2008) A review of factors influencing treatment planning decisions of single-tooth implants versus preserving natural teeth with nonsurgical endodontic therapy. J Endod 34:519–529.

    OpenUrlPubMed
21. ↵
    1. McDermott NE,
    2. Chuang SK,
    3. Woo VV,
    4. Dodson TB

    (2003) Complications of dental implants:identification, frequency, and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:848–855.

    OpenUrlPubMed
22. 1. Morris HF,
    2. Ochi S,
    3. Winkler S

    (2000) Implant survival in patients with type 2 diabetes:placement to 36 months. Ann Periodontol 5:157–165.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
23. ↵
    1. Torabinejad M,
    2. Goodacre CJ

    (2006) Endodontic or dental implant therapy:the factors affecting treatment planning. J Am Dent Assoc 137:973–977, quiz 1027-1028.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
24. ↵
    1. Vehemente VA,
    2. Chuang SK,
    3. Daher S,
    4. Muftu A,
    5. Dodson TB

    (2002) Risk factors affecting dental implant survival. J Oral Implantol 28:74–81.

    OpenUrlPubMed
25. ↵
    1. Raphael D,
    2. Brown I,
    3. Renwick R,
    4. Rootman I

    (1994) Quality of life theory and assessment:what are the implications for health promotion [Issues in Health Promotion Series] (University of Toronto, Centre for Health Promotion, Toronto (CN)).