Prediction of squamous cell carcinoma cases from squamous cell hyperplasia in throat lesions using CT radiomics model

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Wagner S,
   2. Wittekindt C,
   3. Sharma SJ,
   4. Wuerdemann N,
   5. Jüttner T,
   6. Reuschenbach M, et al.

   Human papillomavirus association is the most important predictor for surgically treated patients with oropharyngeal cancer. Br J Cancer 2017; 116: 1604–1611.

   OpenUrl
2. 2.↵
   1. Seok J,
   2. Ryu CH,
   3. Ryu J,
   4. Kim JH,
   5. Lee SJ,
   6. Park WS, et al.

   Prognostic implication of SOX2 expression associated with p16 in oropharyngeal cancer: A study of consecutive tissue microarrays and TCGA. Biology (Basel) 2020; 9: 387.

   OpenUrl
3. 3.↵
   1. Diamant A,
   2. Chatterjee A,
   3. Vallières M,
   4. Shenouda G,
   5. Seuntjens J.

   Deep learning in head & neck cancer outcome prediction. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 2764.

   OpenUrl
4. 4.↵
   1. Gong H,
   2. Shi Y,
   3. Xiao X,
   4. Cao P,
   5. Wu C,
   6. Tao L, et al.

   Alterations of microbiota structure in the larynx relevant to laryngeal carcinoma. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 5507.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. 5.↵
   1. Yin P,
   2. Mao N,
   3. Zhao C,
   4. Wu J,
   5. Sun C,
   6. Chen L, et al.

   Comparison of radiomics machine-learning classifiers and feature selection for differentiation of sacral chordoma and sacral giant cell tumour based on 3D computed tomography features. Eur Radiol 2019; 29: 1841–1847.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Avanzo M,
   2. Stancanello J,
   3. El Naqa, I.

   Beyond imaging: the promise of radiomics. Physica Medica 2017; 38: 122–139.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. 7.↵
   1. Zhou Y,
   2. Hu B,
   3. Wu Z,
   4. Cheng H,
   5. Dai M,
   6. Zhang B.

   The clinical outcomes for chordomas in the cranial base and spine: A single center experience. Medicine 2019; 98: e15980.

   OpenUrl
8. 8.↵
   1. Sala E,
   2. Mema E,
   3. Himoto Y,
   4. Veeraraghavan H,
   5. Brenton JD,
   6. Snyder A, et al.

   Unravelling tumour heterogeneity using next-generation imaging: radiomics, radiogenomics, and habitat imaging. Clin Radiol 2017; 72: 3–10.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Constanzo J,
   2. Wei L,
   3. Tseng HH,
   4. El Naqa I.

   Radiomics in precision medicine for lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2017; 6: 635–647.

   OpenUrl
10. 10.↵
    1. Limkin EJ,
    2. Sun R,
    3. Dercle L,
    4. Zacharaki EI,
    5. Robert C,
    6. Reuzé S, et al.

    Promises and challenges for the implementation of computational medical imaging (radiomics) in oncology. Ann Oncol 2017; 28: 1191–1206.

    OpenUrlPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Siddiqua U I

    . Radiomics. KYAMC Journal 2019; 10: 126–127.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Nolden M,
    2. Zelzer S,
    3. Seitel A,
    4. Wald D,
    5. Müller M,
    6. Franz AM, et al.

    The medical imaging interaction toolkit: challenges and advances : 10 years of open-source development. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2013; 8: 607–620.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Shen D,
    2. Wu G,
    3. Suk HI.

    Deep learning in medical image analysis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2017; 19: 221–248.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Fan L,
    2. Fang M,
    3. Li Z,
    4. Tu W,
    5. Wang S,
    6. Chen W, et al.

    Radiomics signature: a biomarker for the preoperative discrimination of lung invasive adenocarcinoma manifesting as a ground-glass nodule. Eur Radiol 2019; 29: 889–897.

    OpenUrl
15. 15.↵
    1. Düzgün F,
    2. Tarhan S,
    3. Ovalı GY,
    4. Eskiizmir G,
    5. Pabuşçu Y.

    Is computed tomography perfusion a useful method for distinguishing between benign and malignant neck masses? Ear Nose Throat J 2017; 96: E1–E5.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Mao L,
    2. Chen H,
    3. Liang M,
    4. Li K,
    5. Gao J,
    6. Qin P, et al.

    Quantitative radiomic model for predicting malignancy of small solid pulmonary nodules detected by low-dose CT screening. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2019; 9: 263–272.

    OpenUrl
17. 17.↵
    1. Haider SP,
    2. Burtness B,
    3. Yarbrough WG,
    4. Payabvash S.

    Applications of radiomics in precision diagnosis, prognostication and treatment planning of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Cancers Head Neck 2020; 5: 6.

    OpenUrl
18. 18.↵
    1. Wu L,
    2. Wang C,
    3. Tan X,
    4. Cheng Z,
    5. Zhao K,
    6. Yan L,et al.

    Radiomics approach for preoperative identification of stages I-II and III-IV of esophageal cancer. Chin J Cancer Res 2018; 30: 396–405.

    OpenUrl
19. 19.↵
    1. Van Calster B,
    2. Wynants L,
    3. Verbeek JFM,
    4. Verbakel JY,
    5. Christodoulou E,
    6. Vickers AJ, et al.

    Reporting and interpreting decision curve analysis: A guide for investigators. Eur Urol 2018; 74: 796–804.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Gillies RJ,
    2. Kinahan PE,
    3. Hricak H.

    Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology 2016; 278: 563–577.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Limkin EJ,
    2. Sun R,
    3. Dercle L,
    4. Zacharaki EI,
    5. Robert C,
    6. Reuzé S, et al.

    Promises and challenges for the implementation of computational medical imaging (radiomics) in oncology. Ann Oncol 2017; 28: 1191–1206.

    OpenUrlPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Guo Y,
    2. Hu Y,
    3. Qiao M,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Yu J,
    6. Li J, et al.

    Radiomics analysis on ultrasound for prediction of biologic behavior in breast invasive ductal carcinoma. Clin Breast Cancer 2018; 18: e335–e344.

    OpenUrl
23. 23.↵
    1. Grossmann P,
    2. Stringfield O,
    3. El-Hachem N,
    4. Bui MM,
    5. Rios Velazquez E,
    6. Parmar C, et al.

    Defining the biological basis of radiomic phenotypes in lung cancer. Elife 2017; 6: e23421.

    OpenUrl
24. 24.↵
    1. Xu J,
    2. Yang P,
    3. Xue S,
    4. Sharma B,
    5. Sanchez-Martin M,
    6. Wang F, et al.

    Translating cancer genomics into precision medicine with artificial intelligence: applications, challenges and future perspectives. Hum Genet 2019; 138: 109–124.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. 25.↵
    1. Lambin P,
    2. Leijenaar RTH,
    3. Deist TM,
    4. Peerlings J,
    5. de Jong EEC,
    6. van Timmeren J, et al.

    Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017; 14: 749–762.

    OpenUrl
26. 26.↵
    1. Orooji M,
    2. Alilou M,
    3. Rakshit S,
    4. Beig N,
    5. Khorrami MH,
    6. Rajiah P et al.

    Combination of computer extracted shape and texture features enables discrimination of granulomas from adenocarcinoma on chest computed tomography. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2018; 5: 024501.

    OpenUrl
27. 27.
    1. Dennie C,
    2. Thornhill R,
    3. Sethi-Virmani V,
    4. Souza CA,
    5. Bayanati H,
    6. Gupta A, et al.

    Role of quantitative computed tomography texture analysis in the differentiation of primary lung cancer and granulomatous nodules. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2016; 6: 6–15.

    OpenUrl
28. 28.↵
    1. He L,
    2. Huang Y,
    3. Ma Z,
    4. Liang C,
    5. Liang C,
    6. Liu Z.

    Effects of contrast-enhancement, reconstruction slice thickness and convolution kernel on the diagnostic performance of radiomics signature in solitary pulmonary nodule. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 34921.

    OpenUrl
29. 29.↵
    1. Wu W,
    2. Ye J,
    3. Wang Q,
    4. Luo J,
    5. Xu S.

    CT-based radiomics signature for the preoperative discrimination between head and neck squamous cell carcinoma grades. Front Oncol 2019; 9: 821.

    OpenUrl
30. 30.
    1. Singh B,
    2. Kaur M.

    An approach for classification of malignant and benign microcalcification clusters. Sādhanā 2018; 43: 39.

    OpenUrl
31. 31.↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Liu X,
    3. Dong D,
    4. Song J,
    5. Xu M,
    6. Zang Y, et al

    . Prediction of malignant and benign of lung tumor using a quantitative radiomic method. Orlando (FL): International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2016.p. 1272–1275.
32. 32.↵
    1. Tobias Hepp,
    2. Matthias Schmid,
    3. Olaf Gefeller,
    4. Elisabeth Waldmann,
    5. Andreas Mayr

    . Approaches to regularized regression-a comparison between gradient boosting and the lasso. Methods Inf Med 2016; 55: 422–430.

    OpenUrl