Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Patterns of breast cancer radiotherapy practices among Saudi radiation oncologists

Reem K. Ujaimi
Saudi Medical Journal May 2021, 42 (5) 562-569; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2021.42.5.20200820
Reem K. Ujaimi
From the Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD, FRCPC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    - Features of hypofractionation regimens.

    Survey questions and response(s)n (%)
    The following is a reason not to hypofractionate*
    Nodal irradiation, with or without InM radiation4 (16.7)
    DCIS3 (12.5)
    Postmastectomy2 (8.3)
    InM radiation6 (25)
    Immediate reconstruction11 (45.8)
    Skin involvement3 (12.5)
    None6 (25)
    Other2 (8.3)
    Dose (Gy/F)
    42.4/165 (20.8)
    40/1518 (75)
    Other1 (4.2)
    Boost dose (Gy/F)
    2.0012 (50)
    2.512 (50)
    Organs at risk constraints
    I use the exact same constraints as conventional fractionation13 (54.2)
    I change the dose parameters based on the EQD2 calculation6 (25)
    I follow a certain institutional or trial protocol5 (20.8)
    • ↵* Multiple responses allowed. InM: internal mammary, DCIS: ductal carcinoma in situ, EQD2: equivalent dose in 2 Gy fraction

    • View popup
    Table 2

    - Features of postmastectomy radiotherapy.

    Survey questions and response(s)n (%)
    The following is an indication for PMRT in my practice*
    T3N020 (83.3)
    T3N124 (100)
    T4N any24 (100)
    T1-T2N121 (87.5)
    High-risk node negative13 (54.2)
    Other2 (8.3)
    PMRT volumes*
    Chest wall only unless its N+14 (58.3)
    Chest wall and regional nodes always5 (20.8)
    Chest wall and regional nodes for any T411 (45.8)
    Chest wall +/- regional nodes for high-risk node negative9 (37.5)
    Bolus placement
    Always, every day, removed only for skin intolerance2 (8.3)
    Always, half of the course14 (58.3)
    For T4 only, everyday1 (4.2)
    For T4 only, half of the course6 (25)
    Other1 (4.2)
    The following is an indication for scar boost after mastectomy
    Close or positive margin13 (54.2)
    I boost all patients1 (4.2)
    None5 (20.8)
    • ↵* Multiple responses allowed PMRT: postmastectomy radiotherapy. T: tumor, N: node

    • View popup
    Table 3

    - Features of regional nodal irradiation (RNI).

    Survey questions and response(s)n (%)
    The following is an indication for RNI after BCS and ALND*
    Any N115 (62.5)
    Macrometastatic N114(58.3)
    N1 with high-risk features16 (66.7)
    N1 with inadequate axillary dissection19 (79.2)
    N1 with extracapsular extension18 (75)
    N221 (87.5)
    Any T3N03 (12.5)
    T3N0 with high-risk features11 (45.8)
    T2N0 with high-risk features4 (16.7)
    Nx10 (41.7)
    The following is an indication for RNI after MRM*
    Any N113 (54.2)
    Macrometastatic N113 (54.2)
    N1 with high-risk features14 (58.3)
    N1 with inadequate axillary dissection18 (75)
    N1 with extracapsular extension17 (70.8)
    N221 (87.5)
    Any T3N05 (20.8)
    T3N0 with high-risk features15 (62.5)
    T2N0 with high-risk features2 (8.3)
    Nx8 (33.3)
    The following is an indication for InM LN radiation*
    Radiologically positive InM node23 (95.8)
    N1 and medially located tumor14 (58.3)
    N0 and medially located tumor with certain high-risk features3 (12.5)
    When 50% or more of the axilla is positive14 (58.3)
    Whenever RNI is indicated for right-sided tumors only1 (4.2)
    Whenever RNI is indicated2 (8.3)
    The definition of adequate LN dissection is
    8 or more3 (12.5)
    10 or more20 (83.3)
    15 or more1 (4.2)
    • ↵* Multiple responses allowed, CTV: clinical target volume, IMRT: intensity modulated radiotherapy, LN: lymph node, RTOG: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, PTV: planning target volume, ESTRO: European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, InM; internal mammary, VMAT: volumetric modulated arc therapy, SC: supraclavicular, ECE: extracapsular extension, T: tumor, N: node

    • View popup
    Table 4

    - Features of radiotherapy planning (N=24).

    Survey questionResponsen (%)
    I contour chest wall/breastAlways21 (87.5)
    Never1 (4.2)
    Only when treating with IMRT2 (8.3)
    I contour nodal CTVAlways23 (95.8)
    Never0 (0)
    Only when treating with IMRT1 (4.2)
    If nodal CTV was contoured*I adjust the field border/shielding accordingly16 (66.7)
    I follow the standard field borders and use the contours for reference only9 (37.5)
    I don’t contour nodal CTV anyway0 (0)
    Other0 (0)
    My LN CTV followsRTOG atlas20 (83.3)
    ESTRO atlas2 (8.3)
    Other2 (8.3)
    My LN PTVIs 3 mm3 (12.5)
    Is 5 mm12 (50)
    Is equal to my CTV2 (8.3)
    Is technique dependent, I add 3-5 mm when using IMRT but not with 3D7 (29.2)
    Other0.(0)
    InM PTVIs equal to my CTV2 (8.3)
    5 mm all around5 (20.8)
    3 mm all around3 (12.5)
    3 or 5 mm, but trimmed from lung/heart6 (25)
    Is technique dependent, I add 3-5 mm when using IMRT but not with 3D, and I DO NOT trim from lung or heart5 (20.8)
    Is technique dependent, I add 3-5 mm when using IMRT but not with 3D, and I DO trim from lung or heart3 (12.5)
    Other0 (0)
    Acceptable InM PTV coverage is80% of prescription7 (29.2)
    90% of prescription8 (33.3)
    95% of prescription4 (16.7)
    I only care about CTV coverage4 (16.7)
    Acceptable InM CTV coverage80% of prescription6 (25)
    90% of prescription13 (54.2)
    95% of prescription5 (20.8)
    Technique used when treating InM*Modified wide tangents whenever possible21 (87.5)
    Direct electron field matching photon tangents whenever possible4 (16.7)
    Step and shoot IMRT6 (25)
    VMAT13 (54.2)
    Tomotherapy4 (16.7)
    Other0 (0)
    RNI after axillary dissection*For any N1 I treat as per MA20 (small SC field encompassing axilla 3-SC)16 (66.7)
    For N1+ ECE I treat the full axilla+SC+/-InM14 (58.3)
    For any N1 I treat the full axilla+SC+/-InM2 (8.3)
    For N1+ inadequate dissection I treat the full axilla+SC+/-InM17 (70.8)
    For N2 I always treat the dissected axilla +SC+/- InM (large MA20 SC field)13 (54.2)
    For N2 I treat the dissected axilla only in cases of inadequate dissection or extensive nodal involvement10 (41.7)
    • ↵* Multiple responses allowed. CTV: clinical target volume, IMRT: intensity modulated radiotherapy, LN: lymph node, RTOG: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, PTV: planning target volume, ESTRO: European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, InM: internal mammary, VMAT: volumetric modulated arc therapy, RNI: regional nodal irradiation, SC: supraclavicular, ECE: extracapsular extension

    • View popup
    Table 5

    - Features of DIBH techniques.

    Survey questions and response(s)n (%)
    I use DIBH technique(s)
    With 3D11(45)
    With IMRT/VMAT1 (4.2)
    With both5 (20.8)
    I do not use it7 (29.2)
    I use DIBH technique(s)*
    For all left-sided patients10 (41.7)
    When treating InM on the left side8 (33.3)
    When heart constraints are not acceptable11(45.8)
    At our department we have a protocol for screening patients who could benefit from it2 (8.3)
    I do not use it because it is not available at our center6 (25)
    Other1 (4.2)
    If you chose other above, please specify
    Any side with InMN, also if liver is located high in chest and occasionally with right side SCV field if very young patient
    I do not use DIBH technique(s) because*
    The accessories are not available at my center, I would love to acquire them7 (53.8)
    It takes a long time in the machine; we cannot afford it3 (23.1)
    I am satisfied with my treatment without it5 (38.5)
    No reason, just never thought of using it1 (7.7)
    • ↵* Multiple responses allowed. DIBH: deep inspirational breath hold, IMRT: intensity modulated radiotherapy, VMAT: volumetric modulated arc therapy, InM: internal mammary, InMN: internal mammary nodes, SCV: supraclavicular

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 42 (5)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 42, Issue 5
1 May 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patterns of breast cancer radiotherapy practices among Saudi radiation oncologists
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Patterns of breast cancer radiotherapy practices among Saudi radiation oncologists
Reem K. Ujaimi
Saudi Medical Journal May 2021, 42 (5) 562-569; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.5.20200820

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Patterns of breast cancer radiotherapy practices among Saudi radiation oncologists
Reem K. Ujaimi
Saudi Medical Journal May 2021, 42 (5) 562-569; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.5.20200820
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hematological parameters in recent and past dengue infections in Jazan Province, Saudi Arabia
  • Longitudinal analysis of foodborne disease outbreaks in Saudi Arabia
  • Psychological stress and its association with bronchial asthma in Saudi Arabia
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • radiotherapy
  • breast
  • Saudi Arabia
  • practice

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire