Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

The psychometric properties test of the Malay version of the endometriosis health profile-30

Mardiana Mansor, Mei C. Chong, Ping L. Chui, Mukhri Hamdan and Muzaitul Akma Mustapa K. Basha
Saudi Medical Journal September 2023, 44 (9) 933-939; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2023.44.9.20230228

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Andres MP,
    2. Mendes RFP,
    3. Hernandes C,
    4. Araújo SEA,
    5. Podgaec S.
    Hormone treatment as first line therapy is safe and relieves pelvic pain in women with bowel endometriosis. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 2019; 17: eAO4583.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Aerts L,
    2. Grangier L,
    3. Streuli I,
    4. Dällenbach P,
    5. Marci R,
    6. Wenger JM, et al.
    Psychosocial impact of endometriosis: from co-morbidity to intervention. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 50: 2–10.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.
    1. Cicinelli E,
    2. Trojano G,
    3. Mastromauro M,
    4. Vimercati A,
    5. Marinaccio M,
    6. Mitola PC, et al.
    Higher prevalence of chronic endometritis in women with endometriosis: a possible etiopathogenetic link. Fertil Steril 2017; 108: 289–295.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.
    1. Evans SF,
    2. Brooks TA,
    3. Esterman AJ,
    4. Hull ML,
    5. Rolan PE.
    The comorbidities of dysmenorrhea: a clinical survey comparing symptom profile in women with and without endometriosis. J Pain Res 2018; 11: 3181–3194.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. La Rosa VL,
    2. Shah M,
    3. Kahramanoglu I,
    4. Cerentini TM,
    5. Ciebiera M,
    6. Lin LT, et al.
    Quality of life and fertility preservation counseling for women with gynecological cancer: an integrated psychological and clinical perspective. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2020; 41: 86–92.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.
    1. Roomaney R,
    2. Kagee A,
    3. Heylen S.
    Biopsychosocial predictors of symptoms of depression in a sample of South African women diagnosed with endometriosis. Health Care Women Int 2020; 41: 308–329.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Surrey E,
    2. Carter CM,
    3. Soliman AM,
    4. Khan S,
    5. DiBenedetti DB,
    6. Snabes MC.
    Patient-completed or symptom-based screening tools for endometriosis: a scoping review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 296: 153–165.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Desai HJ,
    2. Gundabattula SR.
    Quality of life in Indian women with fertility problems as assessed by the FertiQoL questionnaire: a single center cross sectional study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 40: 82–87.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Laganà AS,
    2. La Rosa VL,
    3. Rapisarda AMC,
    4. Valenti G,
    5. Sapia F,
    6. Chiofalo B, et al.
    Anxiety and depression in patients with endometriosis: impact and management challenges. Int J Womens Health 2017; 9: 323–330.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Rowe H,
    2. Quinlivan J.
    Let’s not forget endometriosis and infertility amid the covid-19 crisis. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2020; 41: 83–85.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Chowdhury TS,
    2. Mahmud N,
    3. Chowdhury TA.
    Endometriosis: correlation of severity of pain with stages of disease. J Bangladesh college phy surg 2016; 34: 135–139.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.
    1. Yasui T,
    2. Hayashi K,
    3. Nagai K,
    4. Mizunuma H,
    5. Kubota T,
    6. Lee JS, et al.
    Risk profiles for endometriosis in Japanese women: results from a repeated survey of self-reports. J Epidemiol 2015; 25: 194–203.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.
    1. Tanmahasamut P,
    2. Noothong S,
    3. Sanga-Areekul N,
    4. Silprasit K,
    5. Dangrat C.
    Prevalence of endometriosis in women undergoing surgery for benign gynecologic diseases. J Med Assoc Thai 2014; 97: 147–152.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Yamamoto A,
    2. Johnstone EB,
    3. Bloom MS,
    4. Huddleston HG,
    5. Fujimoto VY.
    A higher prevalence of endometriosis among Asian women does not contribute to poorer IVF outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet 2017; 34: 765–774.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Moradi M,
    2. Parker M,
    3. Sneddon A,
    4. Lopez V,
    5. Ellwood D.
    The endometriosis impact questionnaire (EIQ): a tool to measure the long-term impact of endometriosis on different aspects of women’s lives. BMC Womens Health 2019; 19: 64.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.
    1. Kiykac Altinbas S,
    2. Bayoglu Tekin Y,
    3. Dilbaz B,
    4. Dilbaz S.
    Evaluation of quality of life in fertile Turkish women with severe endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 35: 49–52.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Laas E,
    2. Zacharopoulou C,
    3. Montanari G,
    4. Seracchioli R,
    5. Abrão MS,
    6. Bassi MA, et al.
    External validation of the SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaire in Italian and Brazilian populations to select patients with colorectal endometriosis for surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015; 22: 378–383.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Oxford University Innovation. The endometriosis health profile (EHP). [Updated 2001; accessed 2023 Feb 15]. Available from: https://innovation.ox.ac.uk/outcome-measures/endometriosis-health-profile-ehp/
  19. 19.↵
    1. Jones G,
    2. Jenkinson C,
    3. Taylor N,
    4. Mills A,
    5. Kennedy S.
    Measuring quality of life in women with endometriosis: tests of data quality, score reliability, response rate and scaling assumptions of the endometriosis health profile questionnaire. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 2686–2693.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Khong SY,
    2. Lam A,
    3. Luscombe G.
    Is the 30-item endometriosis health profile (EHP-30) suitable as a self-report health status instrument for clinical trials? Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 1928–1932.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Florentino AVA,
    2. Pereira AMG,
    3. Martins JA,
    4. Lopes RGC,
    5. Arruda RM.
    Quality of life assessment by the endometriosis health profile (EHP-30) questionnaire prior to treatment for ovarian endometriosis in Brazilian women. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2019; 41: 548–554.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.
    1. Van de Burgt TJ,
    2. Hendriks JC,
    3. Kluivers KB.
    Quality of life in endometriosis: evaluation of the Dutch-version endometriosis health profile-30 (EHP-30). Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 1863–1865.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Grundström H,
    2. Rauden A,
    3. Wikman P,
    4. Olovsson M.
    Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the 30-item endometriosis health profile (EHP-30). BMC Womens Health 2020; 20: 204.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Nogueira-Silva C,
    2. Costa P,
    3. Martins C,
    4. Barata S,
    5. Alho C,
    6. Calhaz-Jorge C, et al.
    Validation of the Portuguese version of EHP-30 (the endometriosis health profile-30). Acta Med Port 2015; 28: 347–356.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.
    1. Nojomi M,
    2. Bijari B,
    3. Akhbari R,
    4. Kashanian M.
    The assessment of reliability and validity of Persian version of the endometriosis health profile (EHP-30). Iran J Med Sci 2011; 36: 84–89.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Verket NJ,
    2. Andersen MH,
    3. Sandvik L,
    4. Tanbo TG,
    5. Qvigstad E.
    Lack of cross-cultural validity of the endometriosis health profile-30. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord 2018; 10: 107–115.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Jia SZ,
    2. Leng JH,
    3. Sun PR,
    4. Lang JH.
    Translation and psychometric evaluation of the simplified Chinese-version endometriosis health profile-30. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 691–697.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Selcuk S,
    2. Sahin S,
    3. Demirci O,
    4. Aksoy B,
    5. Eroglu M,
    6. Ay P, et al.
    Translation and validation of the endometriosis health profile (EHP-5) in patients with laparoscopically diagnosed endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015; 185: 41–44.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Marí-Alexandre J,
    2. García-Oms J,
    3. Agababyan C,
    4. Belda-Montesinos R,
    5. Royo-Bolea S,
    6. Varo-Gómez B, et al.
    Toward an improved assessment of quality of life in endometriosis: evaluation of the Spanish version of the endometriosis health profile 30. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2022; 43: 251–257.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. M F A,
    2. Narwani H,
    3. Shuhaila A.
    An evaluation of quality of life in women with endometriosis who underwent primary surgery: a 6-month follow up in Sabah Women and Children Hospital, Sabah, Malaysia. J Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 37: 906–911.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Kyriazos TA.
    Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psych 2018; 9: 2207–2230.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Awang Z,
    2. Lim SH,
    3. Zainudin NF.
    Pendekatan Mudah SEM. [Updated 2018; accessed 2023 Feb 25]. available from: no link provided
  33. 33.↵
    1. Jones G,
    2. Jenkinson C,
    3. Kennedy S.
    The impact of endometriosis upon quality of life: a qualitative analysis. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 25: 123–133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Edwards BD.
    Book review: Timothy A. Brown. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2006). [Updated 2003; accessed 2023 Feb 25]. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02801.x
  35. 35.↵
    1. Fornell C,
    2. Larcker D.
    Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Research 2016; 18: 39–50.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    1. Almaleki D.
    The precision of the overall data-model fit for different design features in confirmatory factor analysis. ETASR 2021; 11: 6766–6774.
    OpenUrl
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Citation Tools
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

Keywords