Role of artificial intelligence (Google bard) in morphological, histopathological, and radiological image identifications

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Meo SA.

   Evaluating learning among undergraduate medical students in schools with traditional and problem-based curricula. Adv Physiol Educ 2013; 37: 249–253.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Lakum NR,
   2. Maru AM,
   3. Algotar CG,
   4. Makwana HH.

   Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) as a tool for the formative assessment of practical skills in the subject of physiology: a comparative cross-sectional analysis. Cureus 2023; 15: e46104.

   OpenUrl
3. 3.↵
   1. Harden RM.

   What is an OSCE? Med Teach 1988; 10: 19–22.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Harden RM,
   2. Gleeson FA.

   Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Educ 1979; 13: 41–54.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Kumar N,
   2. Rahman E.

   OSPE for the non-surgical aesthetic training programme. Clin Teach 2022; 19: e13515.
6. 6.↵
   1. Prasad HLK,
   2. Prasad HVK,
   3. Sajitha K,
   4. Bhat S,
   5. Shetty KJ.

   Comparison of Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) versus Conventional Pathology Practical Examination Methods among the second-year medical students-a cross-sectional study. Med Sci Educ 2020; 30: 1131–1135.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Hultgren C,
   2. Lindkvist A,
   3. Curbo S,
   4. Heverin M.

   Students’ performance of and perspective on an objective structured practical examination for the assessment of preclinical and practical skills in biomedical laboratory science students in Sweden: a 5-year longitudinal study. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2023; 20: 13.

   OpenUrl
8. 8.↵
   1. Hutson M.

   Could AI help you to write your next paper? Nature 2022; 611: 192–193.

   OpenUrl
9. 9.↵
   1. Rahman M.M.

   Watanobe Y. ChatGPT for education and research: opportunities, threats, and strategies. Appl Sci 2023, 13: 5783.

   OpenUrl
10. 10.↵
    1. Narayanan S,
    2. Ramakrishnan R,
    3. Durairaj E,
    4. Das A.

    Artificial intelligence revolutionizing the field of medical education. Cureus 2023; 15: e49604.

    OpenUrl
11. 11.↵
    1. Ray PP.

    ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. IOTCPS 2023; 3: 121–154.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Meo SA,
    2. Al-Masri AA,
    3. Alotaibi M,
    4. Meo MZS,
    5. Meo MOS.

    ChatGPT knowledge evaluation in basic and clinical medical sciences: multiple choice question examination-based performance. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11: 2046.

    OpenUrl
13. 13.↵
    1. Sarangi PK,
    2. Narayan RK,
    3. Mohakud S,
    4. Vats A,
    5. Sahani D,
    6. Mondal H.

    Assessing the capability of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing in solving radiology case vignettes. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2023; 34: 276–282.

    OpenUrl
14. 14.
    1. Antaki F,
    2. Touma S,
    3. Milad D,
    4. El-Khoury J,
    5. Duval R.

    Evaluating the performance of ChatGPT in ophthalmology: an analysis of its successes and shortcomings. Ophthalmol Sci 2023; 3: 100324.

    OpenUrl
15. 15.
    1. Friederichs H,
    2. Friederichs WJ,
    3. März M.

    ChatGPT in medical school: how successful is AI in progress testing? Med Educ Online 2023; 28: 2220920.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Patil NS,
    2. Huang RS,
    3. van der Pol CB,
    4. Larocque N.

    Comparative Performance of ChatGPT and Bard in a Text-Based Radiology Knowledge Assessment. Can Assoc Radiol J 2023; 8465371231193716.
17. 17.
    1. Fowler T,
    2. Pullen S,
    3. Birkett L.

    Performance of ChatGPT and Bard on the official part 1 FRCOphth practice questions. Br J Ophthalmol 2023: bjo-2023-324091.
18. 18.↵
    1. Meo SA,
    2. Al-Khlaiwi T

    , AbuKhalaf AA, Meo AS, Klonoff DC. The Scientific Knowledge of Bard and ChatGPT in endocrinology, diabetes, and diabetes technology: multiple-choice questions examination-based performance. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023: 19322968231203987.
19. 19.↵
    1. Abraham RR,
    2. Raghavendra R,
    3. Surekha K,
    4. Asha K.

    A trial of the objective structured practical examination in physiology at Melaka Manipal Medical College, India. Adv Physiol Educ 2009; 33: 21–23.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Singh G,
    2. Singh R.

    Practical skills evaluation of undergraduate medical students by an objective structured practical examination (OSPE): An effective tool for formative assessment in microbiology. MGM J Med Sci (Online) 2020; 7: 74–78.

    OpenUrl
21. 21.↵
    1. Fijačko N,
    2. Prosen G,
    3. Abella BS,
    4. Metličar Š,
    5. Štiglic G.

    Can novel multimodal chatbots such as Bing Chat Enterprise, ChatGPT-4 Pro, and Google Bard correctly interpret electrocardiogram images? Resuscitation 2023; 193: 110009.

    OpenUrl
22. 22.↵
    1. Hamanaka R,
    2. Oda M.

    Can artificial intelligence replace humans for detecting lung tumors on radiographs? An examination of resected malignant lung tumors. J Pers Med 2024 31: 14: 164.

    OpenUrl