Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Comparing the long-term effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and therapeutic ultrasound in treating trigger finger

A prospective cohort study

Reem M. Alfaifi, Alaa A. Juraybi, Abdulrahman M. Alrashed, Abdullah M. Alghidani and Hana M. Alfaifi
Saudi Medical Journal January 2025, 46 (1) 36-42; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2025.46.1.20240612
Reem M. Alfaifi
From the Physiotherapy Department (R. Alfaifi, Juraybi, Alrashed, Alghidani) Al-Rass General Hospital, Al-Rass; from the Neurosurgery Department (H. Alfaifi), Abha Maternity and Child Hospital, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
PT, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Reem M. Alfaifi
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Alaa A. Juraybi
From the Physiotherapy Department (R. Alfaifi, Juraybi, Alrashed, Alghidani) Al-Rass General Hospital, Al-Rass; from the Neurosurgery Department (H. Alfaifi), Abha Maternity and Child Hospital, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
PT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abdulrahman M. Alrashed
From the Physiotherapy Department (R. Alfaifi, Juraybi, Alrashed, Alghidani) Al-Rass General Hospital, Al-Rass; from the Neurosurgery Department (H. Alfaifi), Abha Maternity and Child Hospital, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
PT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abdullah M. Alghidani
From the Physiotherapy Department (R. Alfaifi, Juraybi, Alrashed, Alghidani) Al-Rass General Hospital, Al-Rass; from the Neurosurgery Department (H. Alfaifi), Abha Maternity and Child Hospital, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
PT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hana M. Alfaifi
From the Physiotherapy Department (R. Alfaifi, Juraybi, Alrashed, Alghidani) Al-Rass General Hospital, Al-Rass; from the Neurosurgery Department (H. Alfaifi), Abha Maternity and Child Hospital, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the long-term effects of Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and ultrasound (US) in treating the trigger finger. Trigger finger, also known as stenosing tenosynovitis, is a common type of tenosynovitis affecting the flexor sheath of any finger. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy and therapeutic US are conservative treatments that use waves of varied frequency to target damaged regions and improve function.

Methods: This cohort study was carried out in Saudi Arabia, using samples obtain from the files of patients with trigger fingers who visited the orthopedic department at Al-Rass General Hospital between May and June 2023. Of the 38 people with trigger fingers who were initially included, 24 satisfied the requirements for inclusion (11 underwent US, and 13 received ESWT). Assessments were conducted in September 2023, two months later. A goniometer was used to measure the range of motion (ROM), an electrical dynamometer was used to test grip strength, a numerical pain rating scale was used to quantify discomfort, and QuickDASH was used to measure general functional capacity.

Results: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy and US significantly affected all outcomes, including pain severity, ROM, hand strength, and general functional capability (p<0.005). In the immediate period, the US outperformed ESWT in enhancing general functional capability. Over time, ESWT was more essential for reducing pain (p=0.001).

Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that ESWT and US have similar effects in treating trigger fingers.

Keywords:
  • trigger finger
  • shockwave
  • extracorporeal shockwave
  • ESWT
  • US
  • therapeutic

Trigger finger is a common issue in physiotherapy clinics.1 It is distinguished by discomfort, clicking, catching, and a lack of mobility in the afflicted finger, produced by inflammation and subsequent constriction in the pulleys that keep the flexor tendons tight to the finger bones during flexion and extension.2 The most common pulley effect is the A1 pulley, positioned at the base of each digit where the finger meets the palm.3 Trigger finger is more common in diabetics and women, particularly in their fifth and sixth decades.4,5 There are several trigger finger treatments available, depending on how severe the disease is. Both open and closed-incision surgical procedures can be used to address chronic symptoms.6 Patients who seek medical attention shortly after the beginning of symptoms are advised to get conservative therapy for acute instances.7 Orthoses, physical therapy methods, local corticosteroid injections, and anti-inflammatory drugs are examples of conservative therapies.8-10 Recently, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and therapeutic ultrasound (US) have emerged as viable alternatives to surgical treatment of musculoskeletal problems.11,12 Extracorporeal shockwave therapy, a management technique used in physiotherapy, involves directing high-amplitude sound waves toward the treatment location. This mechanism boosts local blood flow and neovascularization, thereby having a therapeutic impact on function and discomfort.13 In contrast, sound waves produced by the US generate micro-vibrations in the tissues, producing heat energy that increases blood flow in the treated region and raises the levels of essential chemicals and oxygen for healing.14

In recent years, numerous studies have examined the efficacy of ESWT and US in treating a variety of pathologies, including plantar fasciitis, lateral epicondylitis, Achilles tendinopathies, carpal tunnel syndrome, shoulder pathologies, myofascial pain syndrome, and spasticity.15-21 However, no study has evaluated the effects of these modalities on the trigger finger nor defined specific criteria and techniques for their use. There are also no guidelines to determine whether ESWT is superior to the US as a conservative treatment for trigger fingers or vice versa. There is a scarcity of research comparing the effectiveness of ESWT and US for treating trigger fingers. The present study aims to compare the long-term effectiveness of ESWT and US for treating trigger fingers.

Methods

This cohort study was conducted at Alrass General Hospital in Saudi Arabia and was approved by the Regional Research Ethics Committee. The study was carried out from July 2023 to September 2023, with samples collected from patients with trigger fingers who visited the orthopedic clinic between May 2023 and June 2023. Previous study considered in the study were discovered using PubMed, ResearchGate, and Google Scholar.

Participants were included if they: Were diagnosed with trigger fingers using Quinnell’s (1980) classification as follows: 0 (normal finger movements), 1 (uneven finger movement), 2 (actively correctable triggers), 3 (passively correctable triggers), and 4 (non-correctable locked fingers), underwent evaluations by a senior physiotherapist for musculoskeletal disorders during pre-treatment, after 5 sessions, and after 10 sessions. These evaluations used the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), a goniometer to evaluate range of motion (ROM), an electrical dynamometer to test grip strength, and QuickDASH to assess general functional capability, completed 10 sessions of ESWT (2,500 impulses, 1.4 bar, 10 Hz, head diameter 2 cm) or US (1.0 MHz, 70% duty cycle, 6 min, head diameter 3.5 cm) over 5 weeks, in addition to isometric, ball, and rubber band strength training, were at least 18 years old, and had never undergone surgery before.

The exclusion criteria were under the age of 18, using alternative evaluation techniques, not finishing their session, or having other bone diseases, such as osteomyelitis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic inflammatory disease, an active infection around the hand or wrist, or anticoagulant medication for vascular or neurological failure.

An initial inclusion of 38 individuals over the age of 18 years with trigger fingers was made. Four individuals who had undergone procedures were excluded, leaving 34 participants who had never undergone procedures. Of these, 20 participants underwent ESWT, with 4 lost to follow-up, and 18 underwent the US, with 6 lost to follow-up. Twenty-four participants completed the treatment; 13 underwent ESWT and 11 underwent US. Additionally, all participants were evaluated after 5 and 10 sessions. All individuals who met the criteria for participation were initially informed of the study’s aim, methods to be adapted, and evaluations to be made in written and verbal form. Furthermore, each participant was asked to fill out the approval form to be part of the study.

The first group underwent the US, which was made in Italy, whereas the second group underwent ESWT, which was made in Germany. Therapists administered isometric, ball, and rubber band strength training regimens to both groups. All groups were subjected to 10 sessions of ESWT (2,500 impulses, 1.4 bar, 10 Hz, head diameter 2 cm) or US (1.0 MHz, 70% duty cycle, 6 min, head diameter 3.5 cm) over 5 weeks. Ultrasound gel was used to transmit the ESWT and US signals to the patient’s skin. The treatment posture involved the patient sitting with their elbow flexed at 90°, shoulder adducted beside the body, and forearm supinated (Figure 1).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

- The figure illustrates the treatment techniques provided with parameters as following: A) Extracorporeal shockwave therapyparameter: 2,500 impulses, 1.4 bar, 10Hz, head diameter 2cm. B) Ultrasound parameter: 1.0MHz, 70% duty cycle. 6 min., head diameter 3.5 cm. C,D) The treatment posture: patients sitting with their elbow flexed 90 degrees, shoulder adducted beside their body and forearm in supination.

A senior specialist physiotherapist assessed each participant. The NPRS, which goes from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible agony), was used to measure pain. A goniometer was used to measure the range of motion. An electrical dynamometer was used to test grip strength, and the QuickDASH questionnaire was used to measure general functional capability

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill., USA)’. Variables are presented as means and standard deviations (SD). Before the start of the trial, demographic information and data regarding each participant’s disease were extracted from their files and statistically analyzed. The Chi-square test was employed to determine the relationship between categorical variables, whereas the Mann-Whitney U test was utilized for continuous data. A paired sample t-test was performed to examine the individuals’ outcome measurements, pain ratings (NPRS), general functional capacity (Quick-DASH), joint ROM, and grip strength by comparing baseline data with data collected after 5 and 10 sessions. An independent sample t-test was utilized to evaluate pain intensity, ROM, and overall functional capability between the 2 modalities for the short-term effect (data gathered from patients’ files) and long-term evaluation (2 months later). Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

This study comprised 38 patients with trigger fingers; 24 finished their sessions and received either ESWT (n=13) or US (n=11) (Figure 2). Table 1 presents baseline demographic data as well as illness characteristics specific to each group. The 2 groups had no statistically significant differences at the start of therapy (p>0.05).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

- CONSORT flow diagram for extracorporeal shockwave therapy and ultrasound groups.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

- Descriptive analysis of demographic and baseline characteristics for the extracorporeal shockwave therapy and ultrasound groups.

In terms of the immediate results, both the ESWT and the US groups showed a significant improvement (p<0.05 in all outcomes [pain severity, proximal interphalangeal [PIP] joint ROM, distal interphalangeal [DIP] joint ROM, hand strength, and general functional capability) after 5 therapy sessions. After 5 sessions, the US revealed a statistically significant difference in general functional capability (p=0.001) compared to ESWT (p=0.38). When comparing the results after 10 sessions to pre-treatment measurements, both ESWT and US significantly impacted all measures (p<0.05), except for the metacarpophalangeal (MP) and interphalangeal (IP) joints, which showed only minor improvement in the thumb ROM even after 10 sessions (Tables 2 & 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

- Comparison of pretreatment and posttreatment of the shockwave group.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

- Comparison of pretreatment and posttreatment of the ultrasound therapy group.

During the treatment period, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 modalities. However, after 2 months of therapy or over the long term, ESWT demonstrated efficacy in reducing pain and hand strengthening. In short-term outcomes, the US was more effective in improving general functional capability, but there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 modalities after 2 months of therapy in ROM and general functional capacity (Table 4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4

- Comparison of pretreatment, posttreatment, and 2-month measurements of the therapeutic group.

Discussion

The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy of US therapy and ESWT in treating patients with trigger fingers. To achieve this, evaluations of general functional capacity, range of motion, grip strength, and pain severity were conducted before treatment, after 5 sessions, after 10 sessions (data were acquired from patient files), and 2 months following treatment (assessed during the study). All outcomes, including pain intensity, PIP and DIP joint range of motion, hand strength, and overall functional capacity, were found to be impacted by both ESWT and US. Despite this, the MP and IP joints showed only a slight increase in ROM, even after 10 sessions. In terms of short-term impacts, the US was more effective than ESWT in enhancing general functional capability. However, over time, no difference was observed between the 2 modalities, except ESWT was notably effective in reducing pain and hand strength. Related study by Dogru et al,22 patients with second-grade trigger fingers, as defined by the Quinnell classification, can benefit from 10 sessions of radial ESWT (rESWT) in terms of range of motion, grip strength, pinch strength, and general function capability. Additionally, ESWT has proven effective in treating a variety of tendinopathies, including calcific shoulder tendinopathies, plantar fasciitis, lateral elbow epicondylitis, hamstring tendinopathy, and patellar tendinopathy.23-27 In a study by Vahdatpour et al,28 ESWT is effective in reducing the intensity of triggering, enhancing function up to 18 weeks after the intervention, and lowering the level of pain.28 Malliaropoulos et al,29 discovered a significant decrease in the intensity of pain and an enhancement in functional levels. In contrast, one randomized controlled trial compared the effectiveness of corticosteroid injections and physiotherapy, which included 10 sessions of US, wax therapy, massage, and stretching exercises. This study used various measures, such as a visual analog scale, the number of triggering events, hand grip, hand function, and patient satisfaction, and found that corticosteroid injection provided an increased rate of pain relief, a reduction in the average number of triggering events, improved hand grip, and enhanced patient satisfaction at 3 months post-management.30 In the current study, US was shown to reduce pain, improve ROM, and enhance general functional capacity, similar to the effects observed with ESWT.

However, directly comparing the results of the current study with those of previous studies is challenging due to the differences in the devices used, treatment parameters, application methods, and follow-up procedures. Additionally, there are no standardized guidelines for the number of sessions or specific parameters required for ESWT or US to treat soft tissue conditions.

Study limitations

This cohort study was conducted in Saudi Arabia to compare the US and ESWT as conservative treatments for trigger fingers. However, several limitations of the current study should be noted. Firstly, patients included in this study had prior symptom durations as short as one month, whereas most previous studies on ESWT and US which only looked at its efficacy for more chronic tendinopathies, focused on chronic tendinopathies with symptom durations of at least 6 months. Secondly, the study did not include a control group, and all patients received the same amount of treatment. Lastly, the study used a small sample size. To guarantee external validity, a control series of studies will be conducted in the future.

In conclusions, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of ESWT and US in treating trigger fingers, evidenced by pain relief, increased ROM, and enhanced functional capacity. Improvements began after 5 treatment sessions and continued for 2 months, with ESWT showing superior long-term benefits in pain relief and hand strength enhancement compared to the US. Both modalities were equally effective in improving functional capacity over the long term. To further validate these findings, the efficacy of ESWT and US should be demonstrated in randomized controlled trials.

Acknowledgment

We are very grateful to Alrass General Hospital for supporting this research, and We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com)for English language editing.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure. Authors have no conflict of interests, and the work was not supported or funded by any drug company.

  • Received July 27, 2024.
  • Accepted November 26, 2024.
  • Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal

This is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Makkouk A,
    2. Oetgen ME,
    3. Swigart CR,
    4. Dodds S
    . Trigger finger: etiology, evaluation, and treatment. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2008; 1: 92-96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lin GT,
    2. Amadio PC,
    3. An KN,
    4. Cooney WP
    . Functional anatomy of the human digital flexor pulley system. J Hand Surg Am 1989; 14: 949–956.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Sampson SP,
    2. Badalamente MA,
    3. Hurst LC,
    4. Seidman J
    . Pathobiology of the human A1 pulley in trigger finger. TJ Hand Surg Am 1991; 16: 714–721.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Fahey JJ,
    2. Bollinger JA
    . Trigger-finger in adults and children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1954; 36-A: 1200–1218.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Weilby A
    . Trigger finger. Incidence in children and adults and the possibility of a predisposition in certain age groups. Acta Orthop Scand 1970; 41: 419–427.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Saldana M. J
    . Trigger digits: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001; 9: 246–252.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ryzewicz M,
    2. Wolf JM
    . Trigger digits: principles, management, and complications. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31: 135–146.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Rodgers JA,
    2. McCarthy JA,
    3. Tiedeman JJ
    . Functional distal interphalangeal joint splinting for trigger finger in laborers: a review and cadaver investigation. Orthopedics 1998 21: 305–310.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Freiberg A,
    2. Mulholland RS,
    3. Levine R
    . Nonoperative treatment of trigger fingers and thumbs. J Hand Surg Am1989; 14: 553–558.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kazuki K,
    2. Egi T,
    3. Okada M,
    4. Takaoka K
    . Clinical outcome of extrasynovial steroid injection for trigger finger. Hand Surg 2006; 11: 1-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Ozkut AT,
    2. Kilinçoğlu V,
    3. Ozkan NK,
    4. Eren A,
    5. Ertaş M
    . Lateral epikondilitli olgularda ekstrakorporeal şok dalga tedavisi [Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2007; 41: 207–210.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Tsai WC,
    2. Tang ST,
    3. Liang FC
    . Effect of therapeutic ultrasound on tendons. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 90: 1068–1073.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ogden, J. A.,
    2. Tóth-Kischkat, A., &
    3. Schultheiss, R
    . Principles of shock wave therapy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001: 8-17.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Miller DL,
    2. Smith NB,
    3. Bailey MR,
    4. Czarnota GJ,
    5. Hynynen K,
    6. Makin IR, et al.
    Overview of therapeutic ultrasound applications and safety considerations. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 623–634.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Katzap Y,
    2. Haidukov M,
    3. Berland OM,
    4. Itzhak RB,
    5. Kalichman, L
    . Additive effect of therapeutic ultrasound in the treatment of plantar fasciitis: A randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018; 48: 847–855.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.
    1. Leão RG,
    2. Azuma MM,
    3. Ambrosio GHC,
    4. Faloppa F,
    5. Takimoto ES, et al.
    Effectiveness of shockwave therapy in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Acta Ortop Bras 2020; 28: 7–11.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.
    1. Luo D,
    2. Liu B,
    3. Gao L,
    4. Fu S
    . The effect of ultrasound therapy on lateral epicondylitis: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101: e28822.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.
    1. Razavipour M,
    2. Azar MS,
    3. Kariminasab MH,
    4. Gaffari S,
    5. Fazli M
    . The short term effects of shock-wave therapy for tennis elbow: a clinical trial study. Acta Inform Med 2018; 26: 54–56.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.
    1. Feeney K. M
    . The effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for midportion achilles tendinopathy: A systematic review. Cureus 2022; 14: e26960.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.
    1. Li HY,
    2. Hua YH
    . Achilles tendinopathy: current concepts about the basic science and clinical treatments. Biomed Res Int 2016: 2016: 6492597.
  21. 21.↵
    1. Ferrara PE,
    2. Codazza S,
    3. Maccauro G,
    4. Zirio G,
    5. Ferriero G,
    6. Ronconi G
    . Physical therapies for the conservative treatment of the trigger finger: a narrative review. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2020; 12: 8680.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Dogru M,
    2. Erduran M,
    3. Narin, S
    . The effect of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of trigger finger. Cureus 2020; 12: e8385.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Avancini-Dobrović V,
    2. Frlan-Vrgoc L,
    3. Stamenković D,
    4. Pavlović, I,
    5. Vrbanić TS
    . Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of shoulder calcific tendinitis. Coll Antropol 2011: 2: 221-225.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.
    1. Pettrone FA,
    2. McCall BR
    . Extracorporeal shock wave therapy without local anesthesia for chronic lateral epicondylitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 1297–1304.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.
    1. van Leeuwen MT,
    2. Zwerver J,
    3. van den Akker-Scheek, I
    . Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for patellar tendinopathy: a review of the literature. Br J Sports Med 2009 43: 163–168.
  26. 26.
    1. Cacchio A,
    2. Rompe JD,
    3. Furia JP,
    4. Susi P,
    5. Santilli V,
    6. De Paulis F
    . Shockwave therapy for the treatment of chronic proximal hamstring tendinopathy in professional athletes. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39; 146–153.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Lohrer H,
    2. Nauck T,
    3. Dorn-Lange NV,
    4. Schöll J,
    5. Vester JC
    . Comparison of radial versus focused extracorporeal shock waves in plantar fasciitis using functional measures. Foot Ankle Int 2010; 31: 1–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Vahdatpour B,
    2. Momeni F,
    3. Tahmasebi A,
    4. Taheri P
    . The Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Patients with Trigger Finger. Open access journal of sports medicine. 2020 11, 85–91.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Malliaropoulos N,
    2. Jury R,
    3. Pyne D,
    4. Padhiar N,
    5. Turner J,
    6. Korakakis V, et al.
    Radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of finger tenosynovitis (trigger digit). Open Access J Sports Med 2016; 7: 143–151.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Salim N,
    2. Abdullah S,
    3. Sapuan J,
    4. Haflah NH
    . Outcome of corticosteroid injection versus physiotherapy in the treatment of mild trigger fingers. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012; 37: 27–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 46 (1)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 46, Issue 1
1 Jan 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparing the long-term effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and therapeutic ultrasound in treating trigger finger
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Comparing the long-term effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and therapeutic ultrasound in treating trigger finger
Reem M. Alfaifi, Alaa A. Juraybi, Abdulrahman M. Alrashed, Abdullah M. Alghidani, Hana M. Alfaifi
Saudi Medical Journal Jan 2025, 46 (1) 36-42; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2025.46.1.20240612

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparing the long-term effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and therapeutic ultrasound in treating trigger finger
Reem M. Alfaifi, Alaa A. Juraybi, Abdulrahman M. Alrashed, Abdullah M. Alghidani, Hana M. Alfaifi
Saudi Medical Journal Jan 2025, 46 (1) 36-42; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2025.46.1.20240612
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Management of trigger finger (stenosing tenosynovitis)
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Longitudinal analysis of foodborne disease outbreaks in Saudi Arabia
  • Psychological stress and its association with bronchial asthma in Saudi Arabia
  • The factors affecting comfort and the comfort levels of patients hospitalized in the coronary intensive care unit
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • trigger finger
  • shockwave
  • extracorporeal shockwave
  • ESWT
  • US
  • therapeutic

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire