Review ArticleSystematic Review
Open Access

Diagnostic accuracy of coronary angiography using 64-slice computed tomography in coronary artery disease

Fu-Bin Yang, Wan-Liang Guo, Mao Sheng, Ling Sun, Yue-Yue Ding, Qiu-Qin Xu, Ming-Guo Xu and Hai-Tao Lv
Saudi Medical Journal October 2015, 36 (10) 1156-1162; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.10.12415

References

  1. ↵
    1. Critchley J,
    2. Liu J,
    3. Zhao D,
    4. Wei W,
    5. Capewell S
    (2004) Explaining the increase in coronary heart disease mortality in Beijing between 1984 and 1999. Circulation 110:1236–1244.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Chen SJ,
    2. Lin MT,
    3. Lee WJ,
    4. Liu KL,
    5. Wang JK,
    6. Chang CI,
    7. et al.
    (2007) Coronary artery anatomy in children with congenital heart disease by computed tomography. Int J Cardiol 120:363–370.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Bashore TM,
    2. Bates ER,
    3. Berger PB,
    4. Clark DA,
    5. Cusma JT,
    6. Dehmer GJ,
    7. et al.
    (2001) American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:2170–214.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Hadamitzky M,
    2. Taubert S,
    3. Deseive S,
    4. Byrne RA,
    5. Martinoff S,
    6. Schomig A,
    7. et al.
    (2013) Prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiography during 5 years of follow-up in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 34:3277–3285.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Bekkers E,
    2. Roos J
    (2009) Coronary CTA: stenosis classification and quantification, including automated measures. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3(Suppl 2):S109–S115.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Garcia MJ,
    2. Lessick J,
    3. Hoffmann MH,
    4. CATSCAN Study Investigators
    (2006) Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 296:403–411.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Mizuno N,
    2. Funabashi N,
    3. Imada M,
    4. Tsunoo T,
    5. Endo M,
    6. Komuro I
    (2007) Utility of 256-slice cone beam tomography for real four-dimensional volumetric analysis without electrocardiogram gated acquisition. Int J Cardiol 120:262–267.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Bossuyt PM,
    2. Reitsma JB,
    3. Bruns DE,
    4. Gatsonis CA,
    5. Glasziou PP,
    6. Irwig LM,
    7. et al.
    (2003) Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. Croat Med J 44:635–638.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Whiting PF,
    2. Rutjes AW,
    3. Westwood ME,
    4. Mallett S,
    5. Deeks JJ,
    6. Reitsma JB,
    7. et al.
    (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Deeks JJ,
    2. Macaskill P,
    3. Irwig L
    (2005) The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 58:882–893.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Raff GL,
    2. Gallagher MJ,
    3. O’Neill WW,
    4. Goldstein JA
    (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Leschka S,
    2. Alkadhi H,
    3. Plass A,
    4. Desbiolles L,
    5. Grunenfelder J,
    6. Marincek B,
    7. et al.
    (2005) Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26:1482–1487.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Mollet NR,
    2. Cademartiri F,
    3. van Mieghem CA,
    4. Runza G,
    5. McFadden EP,
    6. Baks T,
    7. et al.
    (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318–2323.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Ehara M,
    2. Surmely JF,
    3. Kawai M,
    4. Katoh O,
    5. Matsubara T,
    6. Terashima M,
    7. et al.
    (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 70:564–571.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Schuijf JD,
    2. Pundziute G,
    3. Jukema JW,
    4. Lamb HJ,
    5. van der Hoeven BL,
    6. de Roos A,
    7. et al.
    (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 98:145–148.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Meijboom WB,
    2. Mollet NR,
    3. Van Mieghem CA,
    4. Weustink AC,
    5. Pugliese F,
    6. van Pelt N,
    7. et al.
    (2007) 64-Slice CT coronary angiography in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Heart 93:1386–1392.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Brodoefel H,
    2. Reimann A,
    3. Burgstahler C,
    4. Schumacher F,
    5. Herberts T,
    6. Tsiflikas I,
    7. et al.
    (2008) Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Radiol 66:134–141.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Sajjadieh A,
    2. Hekmatnia A,
    3. Keivani M,
    4. Asoodeh A,
    5. Pourmoghaddas M,
    6. Sanei H
    (2013) Diagnostic performance of 64-row coronary CT angiography in detecting significant stenosis as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography. ARYA Atheroscler 9:157–163.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Mowatt G,
    2. Cook JA,
    3. Hillis GS,
    4. Walker S,
    5. Fraser C,
    6. Jia X,
    7. et al.
    (2008) 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 94:1386–1393.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Ihlenburg S,
    2. Rompel O,
    3. Rueffer A,
    4. Purbojo A,
    5. Cesnjevar R,
    6. Dittrich S,
    7. et al.
    (2014) Dual source computed tomography in patients with congenital heart disease. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 62:203–210.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Li S,
    2. Ni Q,
    3. Wu H,
    4. Peng L,
    5. Dong R,
    6. Chen L,
    7. et al.
    (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 168:2699–2705.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Chen ML,
    2. Mo YH,
    3. Wang YC,
    4. Lo HS,
    5. Wang PC,
    6. Chao IM,
    7. et al.
    (2012) 64-slice CT angiography for the detection of functionally significant coronary stenoses: comparison with stress myocardial perfusion imaging. Br J Radiol 85:368–376.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Kruk M,
    2. Noll D,
    3. Achenbach S,
    4. Mintz GS,
    5. Pregowski J,
    6. Kaczmarska E,
    7. et al.
    (2014) Impact of coronary artery calcium characteristics on accuracy of CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 7:49–58.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Abdulla J,
    2. Pedersen KS,
    3. Budoff M,
    4. Kofoed KF
    (2012) Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:943–953.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Andreini D,
    2. Pontone G,
    3. Bartorelli AL,
    4. Agostoni P,
    5. Mushtaq S,
    6. Antonioli L,
    7. et al.
    (2010) Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 64-slice computed tomography Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol 9:80.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Citation Tools
Bookmark this article

Jump to section