Abstract
Infective endocarditis could present with a plethora of signs and symptoms. Among the rarity of its presentation is acute confusion associated with neurological deficits, mimicking stroke especially in the young population. We report a case of a 33-year-old young man with acute right-sided hemiparesis and confusion 2 weeks after tooth extraction. The brain CT and MRI was consistent with new infarction on the left middle and anterior cerebral arteries’ territory. Echocardiography unveiled the existence of posterior mitral valve leaflet vegetation. Blood culture grew Group B beta-haemolytic Streptococcus, sensitive to penicillin. Two weeks of intravenous gentamicin with 6 weeks of intravenous benzylpenicillin were administered. In this case report, we highlight the importance of recognition of infective endocarditis in a young patient presenting with cerebrovascular accident following tooth extraction.
A wide variety of organisms have been attributed to infections of native heart valves. Among them are staphylococci, streptococci, and the group of Haemophilus, Aggregatibacter (previously Actinobacillus), Cardiobacterium, Eikenella corrodens, Kingella (HACEK) organisms. Aortic or mitral valves (left-sided) accounts for the vast majority of endocarditis cases in non-intravenous drug users. Right sided infective endocarditis contributes 5-10% of all cases of endocarditis, usually among intravenous drug users.1 Emboli from left-sided valvular vegetation can become dislodged or fragmented into the brain via systemic circulation, resulting in neurological complications. In contrast with the right sided embolus, the right sided infective endocarditis may cause embolic phenomenon due to preexisting congenital heart diseases such as patent foramen ovale, atrial septal defect, or ventricular septal defect. In this case report, we highlight the importance of recognition of infective endocarditis with an embolic stroke in a young confused patient with normal cardiac valve following a simple dental extraction procedure.
Case Report
A 33-year-old man presented to the University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, with acute confusion. He was last seen at 9 pm the day prior and became less responsive at 11 am on the day of admission. He was living alone and was noted by paramedics semiconscious (Glasgow Coma Scale of 10/15: eye opening 3, verbal response 2 and motor response 5 [E3V2M5]) with urinary incontinence. No fits noted. Further, history obtained from family members revealed that he had intermittent onset of fever for a week, associated with upper respiratory tract symptoms. He was treated empirically with lung infection, and was given intravenous Ceftriaxone (2-days duration) before discharge with an oral antibiotic (ceftibuten) of 5-day duration. Two weeks prior to the admission, he underwent a tooth extraction. Further history obtained from family members revealed that he had history of consuming ecstasy pills as well as visiting prostitutes (high risk behaviors). He was the youngest among 3 siblings, single, living alone, and working as a lorry driver and water dispenser. There was no significant childhood or family histories.
Initial physical examination revealed blood pressure of 123/72 mm Hg, heart rate of 82 beats per minute, temperature of 39.3°C, with oxygen saturation under room air of 100%. No Kussmaul’s breathing was noted. Pupils were 3 mm equal reactive bilaterally. Neck stiffness was present. However, other signs of meningism (Kernig’s sign and Brudzinski’s sign) were absent. There was an expressive dysphasia. Right sided pyramidal signs were present as evidenced by right facial sagging, hyper-reflexia, and upgoing plantar response, with power of 0/5 over right upper and lower limbs. Cardiovascular examination revealed presence of both normal first and second heart sounds with an apical pansystolic murmur (grade 3/6). Other systemic reviews were normal. No malar rashes were noted, and he had neither peripheral signs of infective endocarditis nor heart failure.
The result of the dextrostix was 11.6 mmol/l (normal range [NR] 4.4 - 6.1 mmol/l). Blood investigations revealed the leucocytosis (white blood count = 20.7 ×109/L [NR: 4.1 - 11.4 ×109/L]) with neutrophil predominant (88.8%). There was normocytic normochromic anemia (hemoglobin 10.7x109/L [NR: 11.6 - 15.1 ×109/L], mean cell volume 87.7 fl [NR: 80.6 - 95.5 fl], and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration 32 g/dL [NR: 31.9 - 35.3 g/dL]), but no evidence of bleeding. The platelet count was normal (297x109/L [NR: 171 - 399x109/L]). Renal function test was otherwise, normal. The acute phase reactant was elevated (C-reactive protein of 39.53 mg/dL [NR: <0.5 mg/dL]). Retroviral and hepatitis screenings were negative. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain demonstrated high signal intensity involving the left middle cerebral artery territory (Figure 1). No hydrocephalus or midline shift. No thrombus was seen within the venous sinuses. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed the presence of an oscillating mass of 3.4 × 1.4 cm at the posterior mitral valve leaflet (Figures 2A & 2B), with mild to moderate mitral regurgitation and mild tricuspid regurgitation (maximum tricuspid regurgitation gradient 22 mm Hg), but no mitral stenosis and normal aortic valve. No regional wall motion abnormality was noted. The ejection fraction was 70%. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis was carried out to exclude meningeal pyogenic infection from septic emboli. It unveiled the absence of polymorphs or lymphocytes, normal glucose level, but slightly raised protein content (586 mg/L). Opening pressure was 350 mm H2O, with negative Indian ink staining and acid fast bacilli smear. Blood culture was positive for group B beta-haemolytic Streptococcus, which was sensitive to both penicillin (minimal inhibitory concentration: 0.047 µg/ml) and ampicillin. However, no growth was found in culture of the cerebrospinal fluid. Tuberculin skin test was negative.
A diagnosis of acute embolic stroke secondary to left-sided (mitral valve) endocarditis was reached. Cardiothoracic consultation was sought, but surgical intervention was not warranted, and he was treated conservatively. He was given intravenous gentamicin 160 mg twice daily for 2 weeks and was planned for intravenous benzylpenicillin 3 mega international units 6 times per day for a total duration of 6 weeks. No nephrotoxicity was noted throughout the treatment. Repeated transthoracic echocardiography one month post-treatment revealed complete resolution of vegetation, with only mild mitral regurgitation but no other valvular lesions. He was able to sit up by himself and feed himself, although his speech has not yet fully recovered.
Discussion
This patient had one major and 3 minor criteria, which fulfilled the Duke criteria for infective endocarditis. These include positive echocardiogram (major criteria), fever of 39.3°C (minor criteria), single positive blood culture (minor criteria), and infarction (minor criteria). Up to 30% of the incidence of systemic emboli has been reported in cases of infective endocarditis,1 commonly involving the central nervous system (CNS). Previous studies2,3 reported a 10% stroke rate. Such neurologic sequela mainly affects the middle cerebral artery (>40%).4 It results in considerable morbidity and mortality with health cost implications. Other less common CNS involvements of infective endocarditis include hemorrhages, aneurysms, meningitis, abscess, or even silent brain emboli. Therefore, MRI is advocated as a crucial imaging modality in detecting more cases of such CNS emboli;5 particularly, left-sided infective endocarditis. A prospective study in Sweden6 has shown that the cerebrovascular complications arise by 65% of the patients with left-sided infective endocarditis. One of the major highlight in this case illustration is the history of tooth extraction 2 weeks prior to the current presentation. This raises the concern of whether endocarditis prophylaxis would be beneficial in this patient without any underlying cardiac conditions. The American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology recommendation in 2007,7 advocates the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for high risk patients undergoing high risk dental procedures (including dental extraction). High risk is defined as those patients with underlying cardiac conditions associated with the highest risk of adverse outcome from infective endocarditis. Conducting trials to answer such doubts of antibiotic prophylaxis in those undergoing high risk dental procedures (like in this case), but do not correspond to the high risk group would sound reasonable but unethical. The benefit exists for this healthy group, but not enough to warrant its routine use as identified in the 2012 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews article.8
The successfully established medical therapy of our patient is another highlight of this case. Although in our case, the evidence of septic emboli with large vegetation may warrant surgical referral, nonetheless, medical therapy was opted. The fact that this patient recovered with such therapy could also be partly due to the favorable outcome of the younger age onset nature of such stroke from infective endocarditis.9 In the our, intravenous beta-lactam (penicillin-G) was combined with aminoglycoside (gentamicin) to medically treat a virulent organism (group B Streptococcus), and low minimal inhibitory concentration (susceptible to penicillin). Such combination is aimed to achieve synergism, as demonstrated in a previous study10 of 179 group B streptococcal isolates with effective bacterial clearance at 6-hour minimal bactericidal concentration.
We reported a case of group B streptococcal left-sided endocarditis complicated with an embolic stroke, which was successfully managed medically. It also underlined the importance of recognition of embolic stroke as part of our differentials in a young man presenting with acute confusion. This could lead to early treatment and subsequent prevention of the high morbidity and high mortality that it carries.
Acknowledgment
We gratefully acknowledge Associate Professor Dr Shahizon A. Mukari for reviewing the Figures for their clarity and correctness.
Footnotes
Disclosure. Authors have no conflict of interests, and the work was not supported or funded by any drug company.
- Received February 5, 2015.
- Accepted March 30, 2015.
- Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.