Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Comparison of lidocaine viscous gargle and topical application on laryngeal mask airway in general anesthesia

A randomized clinical trial

Yan Peng, Ju Qian and Yiqun Mao
Saudi Medical Journal January 2024, 45 (1) 46-53; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2024.45.1.20230368
Yan Peng
From the Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow, China.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ju Qian
From the Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow, China.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yiqun Mao
From the Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow, China.
MSc, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yiqun Mao
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. De Carvalho ALR,
    2. Vital RB,
    3. de Lira CCS,
    4. Magro IB,
    5. Sato PTS,
    6. Lima LHN, et al.
    Laryngeal mask airway versus other airway devices for anesthesia in children with an upper respiratory tract infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of respiratory complications. Anesth Analg 2018; 127: 941-950.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Sun R,
    2. Bao X,
    3. Gao X,
    4. Li T,
    5. Wang Q,
    6. Li Y.
    The impact of topical lidocaine and timing of LMA removal on the incidence of airway events during the recovery period in children: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2021; 21: 10.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Li L,
    2. Zhang Z,
    3. Yao Z,
    4. Wang H,
    5. Wang H,
    6. An H, et al.
    The impact of laryngeal mask versus other airways on perioperative respiratory adverse events in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 2019; 64: 40-48.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Jaensson M,
    2. Gupta A,
    3. Nilsson U.
    Gender differences in sore throat and hoarseness following endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway: a prospective study. BMC Anesthesiol 2014; 14: 56.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Zhao Y,
    4. Jiang Z,
    5. Lv X,
    6. Nie X, et al.
    Incidence of postoperative sore throat after using a new technique of insertion of a second generation laryngeal mask airway: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2021; 38: 285-293.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.
    1. Altinsoy S,
    2. Ütebey G,
    3. Kavak Akelma F,
    4. Ergil J.
    The effects of topical chlorhexidine-benzydamine spray on laryngeal mask airway application. Minerva Anestesiol 2020; 86: 277-285.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Uztüre N,
    2. Menda F,
    3. Bilgen S,
    4. Keskin Ö,
    5. Temur S,
    6. Köner Ö.
    The effect of flurbiprofen on postoperative sore throat and hoarseness after LMA-proseal insertion: a randomised, clinical trial. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2014; 42: 123-127.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hung NK,
    2. Wu CT,
    3. Chan SM,
    4. Lu CH,
    5. Huang YS,
    6. Yeh CC, et al.
    Effect on postoperative sore throat of spraying the endotracheal tube cuff with benzydamine hydrochloride, 10% lidocaine, and 2% lidocaine. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 882-886.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Daabiss M.
    American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification. Indian J Anaesth 2011; 55: 111-115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    1. Brimacombe JR,
    2. Berry AM.
    Mallampati grade and laryngeal mask placement. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 1112-1113.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Downie WW,
    2. Leatham PA,
    3. Rhind VM,
    4. Wright V,
    5. Branco JA,
    6. Anderson JA.
    Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis 1978; 37: 378-381.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.
    1. Jones KR,
    2. Vojir CP,
    3. Hutt E,
    4. Fink R.
    Determining mild, moderate, and severe pain equivalency across pain-intensity tools in nursing home residents. J Rehabil Res Dev 2007; 44: 305-314.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Goulet JL,
    2. Brandt C,
    3. Crystal S,
    4. Fiellin DA,
    5. Gibert C,
    6. Gordon AJ, et al.
    Agreement between electronic medical record-based and self-administered pain numeric rating scale: clinical and research implications. Med Care 2013; 51: 245-250.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.
    1. Canbay O,
    2. Celebi N,
    3. Sahin A,
    4. Celiker V,
    5. Ozgen S,
    6. Aypar U.
    Ketamine gargle for attenuating postoperative sore throat. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 490-493.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.
    1. Dhanger S,
    2. Vaidiyanathan B,
    3. Rajesh IJ,
    4. Tripathy DK.
    Comparison of the efficacy of lignocaine viscous gargle versus ketamine gargle for the prevention of post-operative sore throat after classic laryngeal mask airway insertion: a prospective randomised trial. Airway 2018; 1: 13-16.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.
    1. Schebesta K,
    2. Güloglu E,
    3. Chiari A,
    4. Mayer N,
    5. Kimberger O.
    Topical lidocaine reduces the risk of perioperative airway complications in children with upper respiratory tract infections. Can J Anaesth 2010; 57: 745-750.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Taghavi Gilani M,
    2. Miri Soleimani I,
    3. Razavi M,
    4. Salehi M.
    Reducing sore throat following laryngeal mask airway insertion: comparing lidocaine gel, saline, and washing mouth with the control group. Braz J Anesthesiol 2015; 65: 450-454.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Schulz KF,
    2. Altman DG,
    3. Moher D.
    CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 726-732.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. El-Boghdadly K,
    2. Bailey CR,
    3. Wiles MD.
    Postoperative sore throat: a systematic review. Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 706-717.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Jannu A,
    2. Shekar A,
    3. Balakrishna R,
    4. Sudarshan H,
    5. Veena GC,
    6. Bhuvaneshwari S.
    Advantages, disadvantages, indications, contraindications and surgical technique of laryngeal airway mask. Arch Craniofac Surg 2017; 18: 223-229.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Changchien CF,
    2. Chen HS,
    3. Hsieh SW,
    4. Tan PH,
    5. Lin VC,
    6. Liu CC, et al.
    Topical lidocaine improves conditions for laryngeal mask airway insertion. Can J Anaesth 2010; 57: 446-452.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Bahk JH,
    2. Sung J,
    3. Jang IJ.
    A comparison of ketamine and lidocaine spray with propofol for the insertion of laryngeal mask airway in children: a double-blinded randomized trial. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 1586-1589.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Hutcheson KA,
    2. Hammer MJ,
    3. Rosen SP,
    4. Jones CA,
    5. McCulloch TM.
    Expiratory muscle strength training evaluated with simultaneous high-resolution manometry and electromyography. Laryngoscope 2017; 127: 797-804.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kumar M,
    2. Chawla R,
    3. Goyal M.
    Topical anesthesia. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2015; 31: 450-456.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Van der Woerd B,
    2. Robichaud J,
    3. Gupta M.
    Parapharyngeal abscess following use of a laryngeal mask airway during open revision septorhinoplasty. Int J Surg Case Rep 2015; 16: 198-201.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Steinberg BE.
    Neutrophils: a therapeutic target of local anesthetics? Anesthesiology 2018; 128: 1060-1061.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Rao M,
    2. Chaitanya J,
    3. Subhadra P.
    Comparative evaluation of 2% lignocaine viscous gargling and intravenous lignocaine for insertion of laryngeal mask airway. J Clin Res 2020; 9: 31.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 45 (1)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 45, Issue 1
1 Jan 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of lidocaine viscous gargle and topical application on laryngeal mask airway in general anesthesia
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of lidocaine viscous gargle and topical application on laryngeal mask airway in general anesthesia
Yan Peng, Ju Qian, Yiqun Mao
Saudi Medical Journal Jan 2024, 45 (1) 46-53; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.1.20230368

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of lidocaine viscous gargle and topical application on laryngeal mask airway in general anesthesia
Yan Peng, Ju Qian, Yiqun Mao
Saudi Medical Journal Jan 2024, 45 (1) 46-53; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.1.20230368
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The risk factors for cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Saudi Arabia
  • Prolonged flight exposure and its effects on sinonasal health among aircrew members
  • Identifying individuals at risk of post-stroke depression
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • lidocaine
  • administration
  • topical
  • laryngeal masks
  • intubation
  • intratracheal
  • pharyngitis

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire