Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast

Could it be used as a screening test?

Deema A. Nagadi and Naglaa M. Elsayed
Saudi Medical Journal August 2024, 45 (8) 799-807; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2024.45.8.20230748

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Momenimovahed Z,
    2. Salehiniya H
    . Epidemiological characteristics of and risk factors for breast cancer in the world. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) 2019; 11: 151-164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ruddy KJ,
    2. Gelber S,
    3. Tamimi RM,
    4. Schapira L,
    5. Come SE,
    6. Meyer ME, et al.
    Breast cancer presentation and diagnostic delays in young women. Cancer 2014; 120: 20-25.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Stoltenberg M,
    2. Spence D,
    3. Daubman BR,
    4. Greaves N,
    5. Edwards R,
    6. Bromfield B, et al.
    The central role of provider training in implementing resource-stratified guidelines for palliative care in low-income and middle-income countries: lessons from the Jamaica Cancer Care and Research Institute in the Caribbean and Universidad Católica in Latin America. Cancer 2020; 126: 2448-2457.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Alotaibi RM,
    2. Rezk HR,
    3. Juliana CI,
    4. Guure C
    . Breast cancer mortality in Saudi Arabia: modelling observed and unobserved factors. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0206148.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Albeshan SM,
    2. Hossain SZ,
    3. Mackey MG,
    4. Brennan PC
    . Can breast self-examination and clinical breast examination along with increasing breast awareness facilitate earlier detection of breast cancer in populations with advanced stages at diagnosis? Clin Breast Cancer 2020; 20: 194-200.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Nicosia L,
    2. Gnocchi G,
    3. Gorini I,
    4. Venturini M,
    5. Fontana F,
    6. Pesapane F, et al.
    History of mammography: analysis of breast imaging diagnostic achievements over the last century. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11: 1596.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Sung H,
    2. Ferlay J,
    3. Siegel RL,
    4. Laversanne M,
    5. Soerjomataram I,
    6. Jemal A, et al.
    Global cancer satatistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 209-249.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bitencourt AG,
    2. Rossi Saccarelli C,
    3. Kuhl C,
    4. Morris EA
    . Breast cancer screening in average-risk women: towards personalized screening. Br J Radiol 2019; 92: 20190660.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Scaranelo AM
    . What’s hot in breast MRI. Can Assoc Radiol J 2022; 73: 125-140.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Mann RM,
    2. Cho N,
    3. Moy L
    . Breast MRI: state of the art. Radiology 2019; 292: 520-536.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Wellings E,
    2. Vassiliades L,
    3. Abdalla R
    . Breast cancer screening for high-risk patients of different ages and risk - which modality is most effective? Cureus 2016; 8: e945.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Bakker MF,
    2. de Lange SV,
    3. Pijnappel RM,
    4. Mann RM,
    5. Peeters PHM,
    6. Monninkhof EM, et al.
    Supplemental MRI screening for women with extremely dense breast tissue. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 2091-2102.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Alaref A,
    2. Hassan A,
    3. Sharma Kandel R,
    4. Mishra R,
    5. Gautam J,
    6. Jahan N
    . Magnetic resonance imaging features in different types of invasive breast cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Cureus 2021; 13: e13854.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Meissnitzer M,
    2. Dershaw DD,
    3. Feigin K,
    4. Bernard-Davila B,
    5. Barra F,
    6. Morris EA
    . MRI appearance of invasive subcentimetre breast carcinoma: benign characteristics are common. Br J Radiol 2017; 90: 20170102.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kuhl CK,
    2. Schrading S,
    3. Strobel K,
    4. Schild HH,
    5. Hilgers RD,
    6. Bieling HB
    . Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 2304-2310.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kashyap D,
    2. Pal D,
    3. Sharma R,
    4. Garg VK,
    5. Goel N,
    6. Koundal D, et al.
    Global increase in breast cancer incidence: risk factors and preventive measures. Biomed Res Int 2022; 2022: 9605439.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Seely JM,
    2. Alhassan T
    . Screening for breast cancer in 2018-what should we be doing today? Curr Oncol 2018; 25: S115-S124.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Lee TC,
    2. Reyna C,
    3. Shaughnessy E,
    4. Lewis JD
    . Screening of populations at high risk for breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 2019; 120: 820-830.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Gharekhanloo F,
    2. Haseli MM,
    3. Torabian S
    . Value of ultrasound in the detection of benign and malignant breast diseases: a diagnostic accuracy study. Oman Med J 2018; 33: 380-386.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Sood R,
    2. Rositch AF,
    3. Shakoor D,
    4. Ambinder E,
    5. Pool KL,
    6. Pollack E, et al.
    Ultrasound for breast cancer detection globally: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Oncol 2019; 5: 1-17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Lehman CD,
    2. Lee CI,
    3. Loving VA,
    4. Portillo MS,
    5. Peacock S,
    6. DeMartini WB
    . Accuracy and value of breast ultrasound for primary imaging evaluation of symptomatic women 30-39 years of age. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199: 1169-1177.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Haghighi F,
    2. Naseh G,
    3. Mohammadifard M,
    4. Abdollahi N
    . Comparison of mammography and ultrasonography findings with pathology results in patients with breast cancer in Birjand, Iran. Electron Physician 2017; 9: 5494-5498.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Lehman CD,
    2. Arao RF,
    3. Sprague BL,
    4. Lee JM,
    5. Buist DS,
    6. Kerlikowske K, et al.
    National performance benchmarks for modern screening digital mammography: update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Radiology 2017; 283: 49-58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Aristokli N,
    2. Polycarpou I,
    3. Themistocleous SC,
    4. Sophocleous D,
    5. Mamais I
    . Comparison of the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound and mammography for detection of breast cancer based on tumor type, breast density and patient’s history: a review. Radiography (Lond) 2022; 28: 848-856.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Santiago L,
    2. Candelaria RP,
    3. Huang ML
    . MR imaging-guided breast interventions: indications, key principles, and imaging-pathology correlation. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2018; 26: 235-246.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Brem RF,
    2. Lenihan MJ,
    3. Lieberman J,
    4. Torrente J
    . Screening breast ultrasound: past, present, and future. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204: 234-240.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Geisel J,
    2. Raghu M,
    3. Hooley R
    . The role of ultrasound in breast cancer screening: the case for and against ultrasound. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2018; 39: 25-34.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Langman EL,
    2. Kuzmiak CM,
    3. Brader R,
    4. Thomas SM,
    5. Alexander SL,
    6. Lee SS, et al.
    Breast cancer in young women: imaging and clinical course. Breast J 2021; 27: 657-663.
    OpenUrl
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Citation Tools
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

Keywords