Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Saudi Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • NeuroSciences Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Saudi Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • home
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
    • Join SMJ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Office
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Follow psmmc on Twitter
  • Visit psmmc on Facebook
  • RSS
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Evaluation of candidemia risk factors and Candida species distribution in intensive care units among patients with and without COVID-19

Cemile Uyar, Emel Yıldız, Özlem Genç, Öznur Ak, Emel Koçak, Sevil Alkan, Canan Balcı, Pınar Korkmaz, Duru Mıstanoğlu Özatağ and Halil Aslan
Saudi Medical Journal June 2024, 45 (6) 606-616; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2024.45.6.20240102
Cemile Uyar
From the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Uyar, Ak, Korkmaz, Mıstanoğlu Özatağ, Aslan); from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Yıldız); from the Department of Medical Microbiology (Genç), Faculty of Medicine, Kütahya University of Health Sciences, Kütahya, from the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Alkan), Faculty of Medicine, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, and from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Balcı), Faculty of Medicine, Ümraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cemile Uyar
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Emel Yıldız
From the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Uyar, Ak, Korkmaz, Mıstanoğlu Özatağ, Aslan); from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Yıldız); from the Department of Medical Microbiology (Genç), Faculty of Medicine, Kütahya University of Health Sciences, Kütahya, from the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Alkan), Faculty of Medicine, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, and from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Balcı), Faculty of Medicine, Ümraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Özlem Genç
From the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Uyar, Ak, Korkmaz, Mıstanoğlu Özatağ, Aslan); from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Yıldız); from the Department of Medical Microbiology (Genç), Faculty of Medicine, Kütahya University of Health Sciences, Kütahya, from the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Alkan), Faculty of Medicine, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, and from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Balcı), Faculty of Medicine, Ümraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Öznur Ak
From the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Uyar, Ak, Korkmaz, Mıstanoğlu Özatağ, Aslan); from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Yıldız); from the Department of Medical Microbiology (Genç), Faculty of Medicine, Kütahya University of Health Sciences, Kütahya, from the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Alkan), Faculty of Medicine, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, and from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Balcı), Faculty of Medicine, Ümraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emel Koçak
From the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Uyar, Ak, Korkmaz, Mıstanoğlu Özatağ, Aslan); from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Yıldız); from the Department of Medical Microbiology (Genç), Faculty of Medicine, Kütahya University of Health Sciences, Kütahya, from the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Alkan), Faculty of Medicine, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, and from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Balcı), Faculty of Medicine, Ümraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sevil Alkan
From the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Uyar, Ak, Korkmaz, Mıstanoğlu Özatağ, Aslan); from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Yıldız); from the Department of Medical Microbiology (Genç), Faculty of Medicine, Kütahya University of Health Sciences, Kütahya, from the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Alkan), Faculty of Medicine, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, and from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Balcı), Faculty of Medicine, Ümraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Canan Balcı
From the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Uyar, Ak, Korkmaz, Mıstanoğlu Özatağ, Aslan); from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Yıldız); from the Department of Medical Microbiology (Genç), Faculty of Medicine, Kütahya University of Health Sciences, Kütahya, from the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Alkan), Faculty of Medicine, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, and from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Balcı), Faculty of Medicine, Ümraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pınar Korkmaz
From the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Uyar, Ak, Korkmaz, Mıstanoğlu Özatağ, Aslan); from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Yıldız); from the Department of Medical Microbiology (Genç), Faculty of Medicine, Kütahya University of Health Sciences, Kütahya, from the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Alkan), Faculty of Medicine, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, and from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Balcı), Faculty of Medicine, Ümraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Duru Mıstanoğlu Özatağ
From the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Uyar, Ak, Korkmaz, Mıstanoğlu Özatağ, Aslan); from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Yıldız); from the Department of Medical Microbiology (Genç), Faculty of Medicine, Kütahya University of Health Sciences, Kütahya, from the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Alkan), Faculty of Medicine, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, and from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Balcı), Faculty of Medicine, Ümraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Halil Aslan
From the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Uyar, Ak, Korkmaz, Mıstanoğlu Özatağ, Aslan); from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Yıldız); from the Department of Medical Microbiology (Genç), Faculty of Medicine, Kütahya University of Health Sciences, Kütahya, from the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Alkan), Faculty of Medicine, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, and from the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation (Balcı), Faculty of Medicine, Ümraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    - Comparisons of the demographic and clinical data between coronavirus disease-19 positive and coronavirus disease-19 negative patients.

    VariablesCOVID-19 (+)COVID-19 (-)P-valuesχ2df
    Gender
    Female34 (47.9)20 (47.6)0.9780.0011
    Male37 (52.1)22 (52.4)
    Age (years), mean±SD71±1568±170.402 
    Number of days of hospitalization, median (IQR)29 (20-40)46 (28-85)0.0002* 
    Concomitant Gram positive infection
    Yes15 (21.1)6 (14.3)0.3660.821
    No56 (78.9)36 (85.7)
    Concomitant Gram negative infection
    Yes36 (50.7)25 (59.5)0.3630.831
    No35 (49.3)17 (40.5)
    Other cultures
    Blood29 (59.6)22 (71.0)0.6361.713
    Urine3 (5.9)1 (3.2)
    Tracheal aspirate16 (31.4)7 (22.6)
    The others3 (5.9)1 (3.2)
    APACHE 2 score, mean±SD18.5±8.521.7±11.80.101 
    Expected mortality (%), median (IQR)25.0 (12.0-55.0)31.4 (20.3-67.1)0.074 
    Comorbidity
    Yes59 (83.1)29 (69.0)0.0823.021
    No12 (16.9)13 (31.0)
    Intubation
    Yes54 (76.1)40 (95.2)0.008*6.941
    No17 (23.9)2 (4.8)
    Intubation day after hospitalization, median (IQR)3 (1-10)2 (1-6)0.655 
    CVC
    Yes57 (80.3)41 (97.6)0.009*6.891
    No14 (19.7)1 (2.4)
    Parenteral nutrition
    Yes53 (74.6)41 (97.6)0.002*9.961
    No18 (25.4)1 (2.4)
    Steroid
    Yes62 (87.3)12 (28.6)<0.0001*40.301
    No9 (12.7)30 (71.4)
    Antibiotics
    Yes63 (88.7)41 (97.6)0.0922.841
    No8 (11.3)1 (2.4)
    Lymphopenia
    Yes42 (59.2)19 (45.2)0.1512.061
    No29 (40.8)23 (54.8)
    • ↵Values are presented as numbers and percentages (%), mean ± standard deviation (SD), or median and interquartile range (IQRs). The comparisons of numerical variables between groups were analyzed with the independent-sample t-test and the Mann-Whitney-U test according to the distribution of data. The comparisons of categorical variables between groups were analyzed with the Chi-square (χ2) test.

    • ↵* A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

    • COVID-19: coronavirus disease-19, CVC: central venous catheterization, APACHE: acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, χ2: Ki-kare, df: degree of freedom

    • View popup
    Table 2

    - Distribution of Candida species isolated from coronavirus disease-19 positive and coronavirus disease-19 negative patients.

    Candida speciesCOVID-19 (+)COVID-19 (-)P-valueχ2df
    C. parapsilosis14 (19.7)25 (59.5)0.0001*29.877
    C. glabrata5 (7.0)4 (9.5)
    C. albicans38 (53.5)4 (9.5)
    C. tropicalis4 (5.6)5 (11.9)
    C. spp7 (9.9)1 (2.4)
    C. kefyr1(1.4)1 (2.4)
    C. krusei1 (1.4)1 (2.4)
    C. lusitaniae1 (1.4)1 (2.4)
    Total71 (100)42 (100)
    • Values are presented as numbers and percentages (%). The comparisons of categorical variables between groups were analyzed with the Chi-square (χ2) test.

    • ↵* A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

    • COVID-19: coronavirus disease-19, χ2: Ki-kare, df: degree of freedom, C.: Candida

    • View popup
    Table 3

    - Distribution of susceptible antifungals in coronavirus disease-19 positive and coronavirus disease-19 negative patients.

    AntifungalCOVID-19 (+)COVID-19 (-)P-valueχ2df
    Anidulafungin70 (98.5)41 (97.6)0.1646.514
    Caspofungin68 (95.7)41 (97.6)
    Vorikonazol60 (84.5)23 (54.7)
    Micafungin69 (97.1)41 (97.6)
    Flukonazol50 (70.4)15 (35.7)
    • Values are presented as numbers and percentages (%). COVID-19: coronavirus disease-19, χ2: Ki-kare, df: degree of freedom

    • View popup
    Table 4

    - Distribution of antifungal susceptibilities of Candida species isolated from coronavirus disease-19 positive (group 1) and coronavirus disease-19 negative (group 2) patients.

    Candida speciesAnidulafunginCaspofunginVorikonazolMicafunginFlukonazol
    Group 1Group 2Group 1Group 2Group 1Group 2Group 1Group 2Group 1- Group 2
    C. parapsilosis13 (18.6)25 (61)12 (17.6)25 (61)10 (16.7)14 (60.9)13 (18.8)25 (61)2 (4.0) - 4 (22.2)
    C. glabrata5 (7.1)4 (9.8)5 (7.4)4 (9.8)3 (5)2 (8.7)5 (7.2)4 (9.8)3 (6.0) - 3 (16.6)
    C. albicans38 (54.3)4 (9.8)37 (54.4)4 (9.8)35 (58.3)4 (17.4)37 (53.6)4 (9.8)35 (70.0) - 4 (22.2)
    C. tropicalis4 (5.7)4 (9.8)4 (5.9)4 (9.8)2 (3.3)2 (8.7)4 (5.8)4 (9.8)4 (8.0) - 3 (16.6)
    C. spp7 (10)1 (2.4)7 (10.3)1 (2.4)7 (11.7)0 (0.0)7 (10.1)1 (2.4)6 (12.0) - 2 (11.1)
    C. kefyr1 (1.4)1 (2.4)1 (1.5)1 (2.4)1 (1.7)0 (0.0)1 (1.4)1 (2.4)0 (1.0) - 1(5.5)
    C. krusei1 (1.4)1 (2.4)1 (1.5)1 (2.4)1 (1.7)1 (4.3)1 (1.4)1 (2.4)0 (1.0) - 1(5.5)
    C. lusitaniae1 (1.4)1 (2.4)1 (1.5)1 (2.4)1 (1.7)0 (0.0)1 (1.4)1 (2.4)0 (0.0) - 0(0.0)
    Total70 (100)41 (100)68 (100)41 (100)60 (100)23 (100)69 (100)41 (100)50 (100) - 18 (100)
    • Values are presented as numbers and percentages (%). P-value of 0.600, χ2=25.51, df=28. The comparisons of categorical variables between groups were analyzed with the Chi-square (χ2) test (a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant).

    • C.: Candida, χ2: Ki-kare, df: degree of freedom

    • View popup
    Table 5

    - Distribution of Gram (+) and Gram (-) bacterial species accompanying Candida infection isolated from coronavirus disease-19 positive and coronavirus disease-19 negative patients.

    Gram bacteria speciesCOVID-19 (+)COVID-19 (-)P-valueχ2df
    Gram (+) bacteria species
    Coagulase-negative Staphylococci5 (33.3)4 (66.6)0.024*16.107
    Enterococcus faecium8 (53.3)0 (0.0)
    Enterococcus spp2 (13.3)2 (33.3)
    Total15 (100)6 (100)
    Gram (-) bacteria species
    Acinetobacter spp13 (36.1)7 (28)0.13111.187
    Klebsiella spp15 (41.7)10 (40)
    Escherichia coli2 (5.6)0 (0.0)
    Pseudomonas spp2 (5.6)6 (24)
    Stenotrophomonas maltophilia1 (2.8)0 (0.0)
    Proteus spp0 (0.0)2 (8)
    Klebsiella spp + Pseudomonas1 (2.8)0 (0.0)
    Klebsiella spp + Acinetobacter2 (5.6)0 (0.0)
    Total36 (100)25 (100)
    • Values are presented as numbers and percentages (%). The comparisons of categorical variables between groups were analyzed with the Chi-square (χ2) test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

    • COVID-19: coronavirus disease-19, χ2: Ki-kare, df: degree of freedom

    • View popup
    Table 6

    - Comparisons of the laboratory data between coronavirus disease-19 positive and coronavirus disease-19 negative patients.

    VariablesGroup 1Group 2P-values
    WBC (10/uL)14.16 (7.92-17.89)8.45 (6.09-17.28)0.03*
    HGB (g/dL)9.6 (8.6-11.7)8.7 (8.0-9.4)0.0003*
    PLT (10/uL)168.000 (86.000-277.000153.000 (94.750-449.000)0.593
    Procalcitonin (ng/mL)1.49 (0.46-4.58)2.21 (0.79-5.32)0.206
    CRP (mg/L), mean±SD155.2±79.2163.5±99.20.625
    Creatinine (mg/dL)0.97 (0.70-1.83)0.90 (0.69-1.90)0.816
    AST (U/L)30 (28-79)30.5 (18-64.5)0.04*
    ALT (U/L)32 (28-72)16 (10.3-53.3)0.0002*

    WBC: white blood cell, HGB: hemoglobin, PLT: platelet, CRP: C-reactive protein, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, Group 1: coronavirus disease positive, Group 2: coronavirus disease negative

    • ↵Normally distributed data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and not normally distributed data were expressed as median and interquartile range (IQRs). The comparisons of data between groups were analyzed with the independent-sample t-test and the Mann-Whitney-U test according to the distribution of data.

    • ↵* A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

    • View popup
    Appendix 1

    - Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M27.

    Antifungal agentsSusceptibleSusceptible dose dependentIntermediateResistant
    Fluconazole*≤816-32 ≥64
    Itraconzole≤0.1250.25-0.5 ≥1
    Flucytosine≤4 8-16≥32
    Caspofungin≤2*†   
    Voriconazole<1  >4
    • ↵* Candida krusei recovered from super infections have not been found to be susceptible to fluconazole and may require alternative antifungal therapy.

    • † In clinical studies, voriconazole MIC90 for C. glabrata baseline was 4 ug/ml; 13/50 (26%). C. glabrata baseline isolates were resistant (MIC ≥4ug/ml) to voriconazole. However, based on 1054 isolates tested in surveillance studies the MIC90 was 1 ug/ml.

    • View popup
    Appendix 2

    - Minimum inhibitory concentration interpretative criteria for Candida species as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M27.

    Antifungal agentsSusceptibleSusceptible dose dependentIntermediateResistantNon-susceptible
    Anidulafungin≤2   >2
    Caspofungin≤2   >2
    Fluconazole*≤816-32 ≥64 
    5-Flucytosine≤4 8-16≥32 
    Itraconzole≤0.1250.25-0.5 ≥1 
    Micafungin≤2   >2
    Voriconazole≤12 ≥4 
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Saudi Medical Journal: 45 (6)
Saudi Medical Journal
Vol. 45, Issue 6
1 Jun 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Saudi Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of candidemia risk factors and Candida species distribution in intensive care units among patients with and without COVID-19
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Saudi Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Saudi Medical Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of candidemia risk factors and Candida species distribution in intensive care units among patients with and without COVID-19
Cemile Uyar, Emel Yıldız, Özlem Genç, Öznur Ak, Emel Koçak, Sevil Alkan, Canan Balcı, Pınar Korkmaz, Duru Mıstanoğlu Özatağ, Halil Aslan
Saudi Medical Journal Jun 2024, 45 (6) 606-616; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.6.20240102

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of candidemia risk factors and Candida species distribution in intensive care units among patients with and without COVID-19
Cemile Uyar, Emel Yıldız, Özlem Genç, Öznur Ak, Emel Koçak, Sevil Alkan, Canan Balcı, Pınar Korkmaz, Duru Mıstanoğlu Özatağ, Halil Aslan
Saudi Medical Journal Jun 2024, 45 (6) 606-616; DOI: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.6.20240102
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgment
    • Appendix
    • Appendix
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Psychological stress and its association with bronchial asthma in Saudi Arabia
  • The factors affecting comfort and the comfort levels of patients hospitalized in the coronary intensive care unit
  • Exploring communication challenges with children and parents among pharmacists in Saudi Arabia
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • candidemia
  • risk factors
  • intensive care unit
  • cross infection

CONTENT

  • home

JOURNAL

  • home

AUTHORS

  • home
Saudi Medical Journal

© 2025 Saudi Medical Journal Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.  Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.

Powered by HighWire